Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System

The main objectives of the Country Procurement Assessment Review (CPAR) are to diagnose the public procurement system in Indonesia, assess actual compliance with the country's procurement laws and regulations on the ground, and identify reforms to improve the existing system in line with internationally accepted principles. Section 1 gives an overview. Section 2 describes Indonesia's existing public procurement regime and key issues. Section 3 discusses implications of decentralization for public procurement. Section 4 describes the strategy for strengthening fiduciary safeguards in Bank-financed projects based on lessons of experience and findings of the CPAR. From all accounts, the public procurement system in Indonesia does not function well. It is not market-driven, has been prone to misuse and abuse, and reduces value for money for public funds. The report identifies the key reasons why the system does not yet function well. The report suggests the following priority actions toward a reformed procurement process: a) reforming the legal, regulatory, and institutional framework; b) increasing competition; c) improving procedures and practices; d) building professional capacity; e) preparing for decentralization; and f) strengthening enforcement.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2001-03-27
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, ANTI- CORRUPTION, ANTI-CORRUPTION, ANTICORRUPTION, AUDITS, AUTHORITY, BUDGETING, CERTIFICATION, CIVIL SERVICE, CIVIL SERVICE REFORM, CIVIL SOCIETY, COLLUSION, COLLUSIVE PRACTICES, COMPETITIVE BIDDING, COMPLAINTS, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, CORRUPT PRACTICES, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION SURVEYS, DECENTRALIZATION, DECREE, DECREES, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, DISCLOSURE, DISTRICTS, ETHICS, EXECUTING AGENCIES, EXECUTION, EXPENDITURE, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FISCAL, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, FRAUD, GOOD GOVERNANCE, GOVERNANCE REFORM, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, GOVERNMENT EFFORTS, GOVERNMENT LEVEL, GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES, GOVERNMENT REFORM, HUMAN RESOURCE, IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES, INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, INTEGRITY, INTERNAL AUDIT, INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW, JUDICIAL SYSTEMS, LACK OF CLARITY, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LEGAL PROVISIONS, LEGISLATION, LEGISLATIVE BODIES, LEGISLATURES, LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT, LOBBYING, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MALFEASANCE, MEDIA, MINISTERS, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, MUNICIPALITY, NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, NATIONAL LEVEL, NATIONS, NEPOTISM, OMBUDSMAN, PACKAGING, PROCUREMENT LAWS, PROCUREMENT POLICIES, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, PUBLIC AGENCIES, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC OFFICIALS, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM, PUBLIC RESOURCES, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC SUPPORT, PUBLIC WORKS, PURCHASING, REPRESENTATIVES, SANCTIONS, SOCIAL JUSTICE, SOCIAL SAFETY, SOCIAL SAFETY NET, SOCIAL SECTOR, STATE FINANCE, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES, TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT, GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL REFORM, DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT, COMPLIANCE, CAPACITY BUILDING, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, SUPERVISION SYSTEMS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/03/1089486/indonesia-country-procurement-assessment-report-reforming-public-procurement-system
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15700
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098615700
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986157002024-08-08T18:03:26Z Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System World Bank ACCOUNTABILITY ANTI- CORRUPTION ANTI-CORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION AUDITS AUTHORITY BUDGETING CERTIFICATION CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SERVICE REFORM CIVIL SOCIETY COLLUSION COLLUSIVE PRACTICES COMPETITIVE BIDDING COMPLAINTS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST CORRUPT PRACTICES CORRUPTION CORRUPTION SURVEYS DECENTRALIZATION DECREE DECREES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DISCLOSURE DISTRICTS ETHICS EXECUTING AGENCIES EXECUTION EXPENDITURE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FISCAL FISCAL MANAGEMENT FRAUD GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE REFORM GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EFFORTS GOVERNMENT LEVEL GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES GOVERNMENT REFORM HUMAN RESOURCE IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INTEGRITY INTERNAL AUDIT INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW JUDICIAL SYSTEMS LACK OF CLARITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL PROVISIONS LEGISLATION LEGISLATIVE BODIES LEGISLATURES LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LOBBYING LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MALFEASANCE MEDIA MINISTERS MINISTRY OF FINANCE MUNICIPALITY NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL LEVEL NATIONS NEPOTISM OMBUDSMAN PACKAGING PROCUREMENT LAWS PROCUREMENT POLICIES PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC AGENCIES PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SUPPORT PUBLIC WORKS PURCHASING REPRESENTATIVES SANCTIONS SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIAL SAFETY SOCIAL SAFETY NET SOCIAL SECTOR STATE FINANCE STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT CORRUPTION GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONAL REFORM DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT CIVIL SOCIETY COMPLIANCE CAPACITY BUILDING LEGAL FRAMEWORK REGULATORY FRAMEWORK SUPERVISION SYSTEMS The main objectives of the Country Procurement Assessment Review (CPAR) are to diagnose the public procurement system in Indonesia, assess actual compliance with the country's procurement laws and regulations on the ground, and identify reforms to improve the existing system in line with internationally accepted principles. Section 1 gives an overview. Section 2 describes Indonesia's existing public procurement regime and key issues. Section 3 discusses implications of decentralization for public procurement. Section 4 describes the strategy for strengthening fiduciary safeguards in Bank-financed projects based on lessons of experience and findings of the CPAR. From all accounts, the public procurement system in Indonesia does not function well. It is not market-driven, has been prone to misuse and abuse, and reduces value for money for public funds. The report identifies the key reasons why the system does not yet function well. The report suggests the following priority actions toward a reformed procurement process: a) reforming the legal, regulatory, and institutional framework; b) increasing competition; c) improving procedures and practices; d) building professional capacity; e) preparing for decentralization; and f) strengthening enforcement. 2013-09-09T18:35:53Z 2013-09-09T18:35:53Z 2001-03-27 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/03/1089486/indonesia-country-procurement-assessment-report-reforming-public-procurement-system https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15700 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUDGETING
CERTIFICATION
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLUSION
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPLAINTS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION SURVEYS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECREE
DECREES
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DISCLOSURE
DISTRICTS
ETHICS
EXECUTING AGENCIES
EXECUTION
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FRAUD
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORM
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
HUMAN RESOURCE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LACK OF CLARITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
LEGISLATURES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOBBYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MALFEASANCE
MEDIA
MINISTERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPALITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
OMBUDSMAN
PACKAGING
PROCUREMENT LAWS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
PURCHASING
REPRESENTATIVES
SANCTIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL SAFETY
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
SOCIAL SECTOR
STATE FINANCE
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPLIANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUPERVISION SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUDGETING
CERTIFICATION
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLUSION
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPLAINTS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION SURVEYS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECREE
DECREES
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DISCLOSURE
DISTRICTS
ETHICS
EXECUTING AGENCIES
EXECUTION
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FRAUD
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORM
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
HUMAN RESOURCE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LACK OF CLARITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
LEGISLATURES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOBBYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MALFEASANCE
MEDIA
MINISTERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPALITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
OMBUDSMAN
PACKAGING
PROCUREMENT LAWS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
PURCHASING
REPRESENTATIVES
SANCTIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL SAFETY
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
SOCIAL SECTOR
STATE FINANCE
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPLIANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUPERVISION SYSTEMS
spellingShingle ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUDGETING
CERTIFICATION
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLUSION
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPLAINTS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION SURVEYS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECREE
DECREES
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DISCLOSURE
DISTRICTS
ETHICS
EXECUTING AGENCIES
EXECUTION
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FRAUD
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORM
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
HUMAN RESOURCE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LACK OF CLARITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
LEGISLATURES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOBBYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MALFEASANCE
MEDIA
MINISTERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPALITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
OMBUDSMAN
PACKAGING
PROCUREMENT LAWS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
PURCHASING
REPRESENTATIVES
SANCTIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL SAFETY
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
SOCIAL SECTOR
STATE FINANCE
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPLIANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUPERVISION SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUDGETING
CERTIFICATION
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLUSION
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPLAINTS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION SURVEYS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECREE
DECREES
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DISCLOSURE
DISTRICTS
ETHICS
EXECUTING AGENCIES
EXECUTION
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FRAUD
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORM
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
HUMAN RESOURCE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LACK OF CLARITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
LEGISLATURES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOBBYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MALFEASANCE
MEDIA
MINISTERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPALITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
OMBUDSMAN
PACKAGING
PROCUREMENT LAWS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
PURCHASING
REPRESENTATIVES
SANCTIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL SAFETY
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
SOCIAL SECTOR
STATE FINANCE
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPLIANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUPERVISION SYSTEMS
World Bank
Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
description The main objectives of the Country Procurement Assessment Review (CPAR) are to diagnose the public procurement system in Indonesia, assess actual compliance with the country's procurement laws and regulations on the ground, and identify reforms to improve the existing system in line with internationally accepted principles. Section 1 gives an overview. Section 2 describes Indonesia's existing public procurement regime and key issues. Section 3 discusses implications of decentralization for public procurement. Section 4 describes the strategy for strengthening fiduciary safeguards in Bank-financed projects based on lessons of experience and findings of the CPAR. From all accounts, the public procurement system in Indonesia does not function well. It is not market-driven, has been prone to misuse and abuse, and reduces value for money for public funds. The report identifies the key reasons why the system does not yet function well. The report suggests the following priority actions toward a reformed procurement process: a) reforming the legal, regulatory, and institutional framework; b) increasing competition; c) improving procedures and practices; d) building professional capacity; e) preparing for decentralization; and f) strengthening enforcement.
topic_facet ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ANTICORRUPTION
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUDGETING
CERTIFICATION
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLUSION
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPLAINTS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION SURVEYS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECREE
DECREES
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
DISCLOSURE
DISTRICTS
ETHICS
EXECUTING AGENCIES
EXECUTION
EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FRAUD
GOOD GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORM
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
HUMAN RESOURCE
IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTEGRITY
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LACK OF CLARITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE BODIES
LEGISLATURES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOBBYING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MALFEASANCE
MEDIA
MINISTERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPALITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONS
NEPOTISM
OMBUDSMAN
PACKAGING
PROCUREMENT LAWS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLIC WORKS
PURCHASING
REPRESENTATIVES
SANCTIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL SAFETY
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
SOCIAL SECTOR
STATE FINANCE
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
DECENTRALIZATION IN MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPLIANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUPERVISION SYSTEMS
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
title_short Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
title_full Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
title_fullStr Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
title_full_unstemmed Indonesia - Country Procurement Assessment Report : Reforming the Public Procurement System
title_sort indonesia - country procurement assessment report : reforming the public procurement system
publisher Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-03-27
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/03/1089486/indonesia-country-procurement-assessment-report-reforming-public-procurement-system
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15700
work_keys_str_mv AT worldbank indonesiacountryprocurementassessmentreportreformingthepublicprocurementsystem
_version_ 1807158691651125248