Mexico : Earnings Inequality after Mexico's Economic and Educational Reforms, Volume 1. Main Document

The study reviews the forces driving Mexico's inequality, in particular, the recent expansion in earnings inequality, emphasizing the roles of education on: establishing an analytical framework, that allows interaction between education, and labor market; examining the evolution of earnings inequality, following the macroeconomic, and educational policies of the 80s, and 90s; exploring best practices for the use, and allocation of public educational resources, in light of foreseeable increases in earnings inequality; and, identifying those areas of educational public policy, which impact student graduation. The study argues on the student's decision-making at the secondary, and tertiary levels, concerning the disciplines to pursue, - a choice clearly influenced by several factors - such as taste, abilities, family background, etc. Though some factors may be intrinsic, others could be used as policy tools, to provide advice on best study options, but insufficient effort on the part of educational institutions, and weak information, restrain best option selection. Theoretical support is suggested, to develop basic education, and increase access to the poor; upgrade the level of secondary education; and, improve financial access to higher education. The study contains two volumes, Volume 1 - the main document, summarizes the findings of the background papers, contained in volume 2.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2000-05-16
Subjects:ACCREDITATION, ADDITION, AGE GROUPS, AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, APTITUDES, BASIC EDUCATION, CHILDHOOD CARE, CURRICULA, DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC SECTORS, EDUCATION EXPENDITURES, EDUCATION FACILITIES, EDUCATION LEVEL, EDUCATION SERVICES, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, EDUCATIONAL LEVELS, EDUCATIONAL POLICIES, EDUCATIONAL POLICY, EDUCATIONAL QUALITY, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT, ENROLLMENT, ENROLLMENT RATE, ENROLLMENT RATES, FORMAL EDUCATION, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, INSTRUCTION, LABOR FORCE, LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION, LABOR MARKET, LEARNING, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, LEVELS OF EDUCATION, MEDIA, MOBILITY, NET ENROLLMENT, OCCUPATIONS, PAPERS, PARENTS, POOR PERFORMANCE, POVERTY REDUCTION, PRIMARY EDUCATION, PRIMARY SCHOOLING, PRIVATE SECTOR, PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, PROFESSORS, PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM, PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS, PUBLIC SCHOOLS, QUALITY OF EDUCATION, RATES OF RETURN, RURAL AREAS, SCHOLARSHIPS, SCHOOL ATTENDANCE, SCHOOL QUALITY, SCHOOLING, SCHOOLS, SECONDARY EDUCATION, STUDENT LOANS, TECHNICAL EDUCATION, TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, TERTIARY EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES, URBAN AREAS, VOCATIONAL TRAINING, WORKERS EARNINGS DISTRIBUTION, INEQUITY, ECONOMIC REFORM, EDUCATIONAL REFORM, INCOME GAPS, EDUCATIONAL EQUALIZATION, PUBLIC POLICY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, ENROLMENT RATIO, EDUCATIONAL FINANCING, ACCESS TO EDUCATION,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/05/436969/mexico-earnings-inequality-after-mexicos-economic-educational-reforms-vol-1-2-main-document
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15263
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study reviews the forces driving Mexico's inequality, in particular, the recent expansion in earnings inequality, emphasizing the roles of education on: establishing an analytical framework, that allows interaction between education, and labor market; examining the evolution of earnings inequality, following the macroeconomic, and educational policies of the 80s, and 90s; exploring best practices for the use, and allocation of public educational resources, in light of foreseeable increases in earnings inequality; and, identifying those areas of educational public policy, which impact student graduation. The study argues on the student's decision-making at the secondary, and tertiary levels, concerning the disciplines to pursue, - a choice clearly influenced by several factors - such as taste, abilities, family background, etc. Though some factors may be intrinsic, others could be used as policy tools, to provide advice on best study options, but insufficient effort on the part of educational institutions, and weak information, restrain best option selection. Theoretical support is suggested, to develop basic education, and increase access to the poor; upgrade the level of secondary education; and, improve financial access to higher education. The study contains two volumes, Volume 1 - the main document, summarizes the findings of the background papers, contained in volume 2.