Romania - Functional Review : Transport Sector

This report describes the results of the Functional Review of the transport sector in Romania. During its early transition years, Romania implemented radical structural reforms in the institutions of the transport sector, but over the last decade there has been concern that these changes have not led to tangible improvements in transport policy administration nor in the efficiency and effectiveness of the main delivery institutions in the railway and road sectors. The Review has tried to discern the main reasons for these shortcomings and to identify remedial actions. It focuses on three main challenges: the administration of the transport sector as a whole; the corporate governance of state-owned road and railway companies; and the priorities for the companies themselves. Attention is also given to budgeting issues and opportunities for greater private sector participation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
English
Published: Washington, DC 2010-10-15
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS, ADMINISTRATIVE APPARATUS, ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY, ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK, ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITIONS, AIR, AIR NAVIGATION, AIRCRAFT, AIRPORTS, ASSET MANAGEMENT, ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, AUTHORITY, AUTOMOBILE, BOT, BUDGETARY RESOURCES, BUDGETARY SUPPORT, BUREAUCRACY, BUREAUCRATIC CONTROL, BUS, BUS SERVICE, BUS SERVICE OPERATORS, BUS SERVICES, CAPITAL INVESTMENT, CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM, CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, CAR, CITIZENS, COMMUNITY SAFETY, CONSIGNMENT, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, CORPORATION, CORRUPTION, DECISION MAKING, DECISION MAKING POWER, DECISION-MAKING, DEGREE OF AUTONOMY, DIESEL, DIESEL TRAINS, DISCLOSURE, DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, DRIVER LICENSING, DRIVING, EMISSION, EMISSION STANDARDS, ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, EXECUTION, EXPENDITURE, FARE EVASION, FARE STRUCTURE, FARES, FINANCIAL CRISIS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL RESOURCES, FISCAL COSTS, FISCAL STRESS, FREIGHT, FREIGHT FLOWS, FREIGHT OPERATIONS, FREIGHT SECTOR, FREIGHT TRANSPORT, GOOD GOVERNANCE, GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS, GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES, GOVERNMENT ROLES, GOVERNMENT STRATEGY, GREENHOUSE GAS, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, HAULAGE INDUSTRY, HIGHWAY, HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION, HIGHWAY PLANNING, HIGHWAY PROJECTS, HIGHWAYS, HUMAN RESOURCE, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY, INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES, INFRASTRUCTURE COST, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT, INSPECTION, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, INTERCITY NETWORK, LABOR PRODUCTIVITY, LEGISLATION, LOCOMOTIVE, MARITIME TRANSPORT, MEMBER STATES, MINISTRIES OF TRANSPORT, MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, MODES OF TRANSPORT, MOTORWAYS, NATIONAL RAILWAY, NATIONAL TRANSPORT, PASSENGER RAIL, PASSENGER SERVICE, PASSENGER SERVICES, PASSENGER TRAIN, PASSENGERS, PATRONAGE, POLITICIANS, PRIVATE CONCESSIONS, PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP, PRIVATE RAIL OPERATORS, PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION, PSP, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC FINANCE, PUBLIC FUNDING, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC INVESTMENT, PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, PUBLIC RESOURCES, PUBLIC ROADS, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE, RAIL, RAIL COMPANIES, RAIL COMPANY, RAIL CORRIDORS, RAIL FREIGHT, RAIL FREIGHT MARKET, RAIL FREIGHT OPERATOR, RAIL FUNDING, RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE, RAIL MARKET, RAIL NETWORK, RAIL NETWORKS, RAIL PASSENGER, RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE, RAIL SECTOR, RAIL SERVICES, RAIL TRANSPORT, RAILWAY, RAILWAY COMPANIES, RAILWAY INDUSTRY, RAILWAY INTEROPERABILITY, RAILWAY NETWORK, RAILWAY OPERATORS, RAILWAY ROUTE, RAILWAY SECTOR, RAILWAY SYSTEM, RAILWAYS, RATIONALIZATION, REGIONAL RAIL SERVICES, REGULATORY AUTHORITY, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, REGULATORY POLICY, REGULATORY REGIME, REGULATORY SYSTEM, REHABILITATION, ROAD, ROAD CAPACITY, ROAD HAULAGE, ROAD HAULAGE INDUSTRY, ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE, ROAD MAINTENANCE, ROAD NETWORK, ROAD SAFETY, ROAD SECTOR, ROAD TRAFFIC, ROAD TRANSPORT, ROAD USER, ROAD USER CHARGE, ROAD USER CHARGES, ROADS, ROLLING STOCK, ROUTE, ROUTES, SAFETY, SAFETY AGENCY, SHAREHOLDERS, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE, STATE AUTHORITY, STATE BUDGET, STATE INSTITUTIONS, STATE OWNERSHIP, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES, SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES, TAX, TAX REVENUES, TECHNOCRAT, TECHNOCRATS, TRACK CAPACITY, TRAFFIC, TRAFFIC DENSITY, TRAFFIC FLOWS, TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, TRAFFIC SAFETY, TRAFFIC VOLUME, TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPORT, TRANSPORT AGREEMENTS, TRANSPORT DEMAND, TRANSPORT FUNDING, TRANSPORT INDUSTRY, TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT INVESTMENTS, TRANSPORT MODES, TRANSPORT NOISE, TRANSPORT POLICY, TRANSPORT PROJECTS, TRANSPORT SECTOR, TRANSPORT SERVICE, TRANSPORT SERVICE PROVISION, TRANSPORT SERVICES, TRANSPORT STRATEGY, TRANSPORTATION, TRAVELERS, VEHICLE, VEHICLE OWNERS, VETO,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/10/17055950/romania-functional-review-transport-sector
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/12278
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This report describes the results of the Functional Review of the transport sector in Romania. During its early transition years, Romania implemented radical structural reforms in the institutions of the transport sector, but over the last decade there has been concern that these changes have not led to tangible improvements in transport policy administration nor in the efficiency and effectiveness of the main delivery institutions in the railway and road sectors. The Review has tried to discern the main reasons for these shortcomings and to identify remedial actions. It focuses on three main challenges: the administration of the transport sector as a whole; the corporate governance of state-owned road and railway companies; and the priorities for the companies themselves. Attention is also given to budgeting issues and opportunities for greater private sector participation.