An Evaluation of Bank Support for Decentralization in Client Countries
Developing countries have decentralized functions and responsibilities for service delivery to lower levels of government at an increasing pace in recent years. The main reasons for such reforms are often political, but governments adopt them also as a way to improve service delivery and local governance. Typically, after the political decision is made, a country will turn to its development partners including the World Bank for support in implementing the new policies and achieving their development objectives. Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) assessed the effectiveness of Bank support for decentralization between FY90 and FY07 in 20 countries, seeking to inform the design and implementation of future support. Given the difficulties of measuring the results of decentralization, the evaluation used intermediate outcome indicators such as strengthened legal and regulatory frameworks for intergovernmental relations, improved administrative capacity, and increased accountability of sub-national governments and functionaries to higher levels of government and to local citizens to assess the results of Bank support in these 20 cases. To examine potential lessons at a sectoral level, the evaluation also assessed whether Bank support for decentralization improved intermediate outcomes for service delivery in the education sector in 6 of the 20 countries.
| Summary: | Developing countries have decentralized
functions and responsibilities for service delivery to lower
levels of government at an increasing pace in recent years.
The main reasons for such reforms are often political, but
governments adopt them also as a way to improve service
delivery and local governance. Typically, after the
political decision is made, a country will turn to its
development partners including the World Bank for support in
implementing the new policies and achieving their
development objectives. Independent Evaluation Group (IEG)
assessed the effectiveness of Bank support for
decentralization between FY90 and FY07 in 20 countries,
seeking to inform the design and implementation of future
support. Given the difficulties of measuring the results of
decentralization, the evaluation used intermediate outcome
indicators such as strengthened legal and regulatory
frameworks for intergovernmental relations, improved
administrative capacity, and increased accountability of
sub-national governments and functionaries to higher levels
of government and to local citizens to assess the results of
Bank support in these 20 cases. To examine potential lessons
at a sectoral level, the evaluation also assessed whether
Bank support for decentralization improved intermediate
outcomes for service delivery in the education sector in 6
of the 20 countries. |
|---|