Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France

To document and halt biodiversity loss, monitoring, quantifying trends and assessing management and conservation strategies on wildlife populations and communities are crucial steps. With increasing technological innovations, more and more data are collected and new quantitative methods are constantly developed. These rapid developments come with an increasing need for analytical skills, which are hardly accessible to managers. On the other hand, researchers spend more and more time on research grant applications and administrative tasks, which leaves fewer opportunities for knowledge transfer. This situation tends to increase the gap between researchers and managers. Here, we illustrate how to fill this gap by presenting two long-term collaborations between a research unit—Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology; CEFE—and a national agency—French Biodiversity Agency; OFB. The first example is a collaboration providing statistical support to national parks for the design and implementation of scientific monitoring protocols. It relies on the recruitment of a research engineer funded by OFB and physically based at CEFE, who works closely with OFB and managers. The second example is a collaboration on the management of large carnivores. For more than 10 years, it has involved several PhD students and post-doctoral fellows co-supervised by CEFE and OFB, and has recently resulted in the recruitment of a permanent OFB researcher who works half-time at CEFE and half-time at OFB. These case studies illustrate the modalities of collaborative work between public institutions acting at different levels of biodiversity conservation for the co-construction of research agendas and the exchange of knowledge. These collaborations also bring out some challenges. Inter-knowledge and mutual learning remain difficult at scales larger than that of the teams concerned. The staff working at this interface needs to possess good listening skills, respect all partners' needs and demonstrate flexibility. Knowledge exchanges require time, thus reducing productivity according to quantitative metrics such as scientific publications or institutional reports. These collaborations can therefore be difficult to assume socially, and remain tenuous because they rely on a good understanding of the differences in governance of the various partners. Based on our experience, success is favoured by long-term and close relationships, and by co-construction of projects at early stage. Sharing a space (i.e. office or building) facilitates face-to-face interactions during planned work sessions and casual meetings that build up a shared scientific culture and mutual trust.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Couturier, Thibaut, Bauduin, Sarah, Astruc, Guillelme, Blanck, Aurélie, Canonne, Coline, Chambert, Thierry, Chiffard, Jules, Cosquer, Alix, Cubaynes, Sarah, Curtet, Laurence, Dortel, Emmanuelle, Drouet-Hoguet, Nolwenn, Duchamp, Christophe, Francesiaz, Charlotte, Grente, Oksana, Jailloux, Adrien, Kervellec, Maëlis, Lauret, Valentin, Lebreton, Jean Dominique, Louvrier, Julie, Marescot, Lucile, Mathevet, Raphaël, Navas, Marie-Laure, Perrot, Charlotte, Poulet, Nicolas, Quenette, Pierre--Yves, Salas, Michel, Souchay, Guillaume, Vanpé, Cécile, Besnard, Aurélien, Gimenez, Olivier
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, biodiversité, conservation de la diversité biologique, protection de l'environnement, étude de cas, collaboration, recherche interdisciplinaire, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/2/Ecol%20Sol%20and%20Evidence%20-%202023%20-%20Couturier%20-%20Building%20spaces%20of%20interactions%20between%20researchers%20and%20managers%20%20Case%20studies.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-607895
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
biodiversité
conservation de la diversité biologique
protection de l'environnement
étude de cas
collaboration
recherche interdisciplinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
biodiversité
conservation de la diversité biologique
protection de l'environnement
étude de cas
collaboration
recherche interdisciplinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543
spellingShingle P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
biodiversité
conservation de la diversité biologique
protection de l'environnement
étude de cas
collaboration
recherche interdisciplinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
biodiversité
conservation de la diversité biologique
protection de l'environnement
étude de cas
collaboration
recherche interdisciplinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543
Couturier, Thibaut
Bauduin, Sarah
Astruc, Guillelme
Blanck, Aurélie
Canonne, Coline
Chambert, Thierry
Chiffard, Jules
Cosquer, Alix
Cubaynes, Sarah
Curtet, Laurence
Dortel, Emmanuelle
Drouet-Hoguet, Nolwenn
Duchamp, Christophe
Francesiaz, Charlotte
Grente, Oksana
Jailloux, Adrien
Kervellec, Maëlis
Lauret, Valentin
Lebreton, Jean Dominique
Louvrier, Julie
Marescot, Lucile
Mathevet, Raphaël
Navas, Marie-Laure
Perrot, Charlotte
Poulet, Nicolas
Quenette, Pierre--Yves
Salas, Michel
Souchay, Guillaume
Vanpé, Cécile
Besnard, Aurélien
Gimenez, Olivier
Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
description To document and halt biodiversity loss, monitoring, quantifying trends and assessing management and conservation strategies on wildlife populations and communities are crucial steps. With increasing technological innovations, more and more data are collected and new quantitative methods are constantly developed. These rapid developments come with an increasing need for analytical skills, which are hardly accessible to managers. On the other hand, researchers spend more and more time on research grant applications and administrative tasks, which leaves fewer opportunities for knowledge transfer. This situation tends to increase the gap between researchers and managers. Here, we illustrate how to fill this gap by presenting two long-term collaborations between a research unit—Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology; CEFE—and a national agency—French Biodiversity Agency; OFB. The first example is a collaboration providing statistical support to national parks for the design and implementation of scientific monitoring protocols. It relies on the recruitment of a research engineer funded by OFB and physically based at CEFE, who works closely with OFB and managers. The second example is a collaboration on the management of large carnivores. For more than 10 years, it has involved several PhD students and post-doctoral fellows co-supervised by CEFE and OFB, and has recently resulted in the recruitment of a permanent OFB researcher who works half-time at CEFE and half-time at OFB. These case studies illustrate the modalities of collaborative work between public institutions acting at different levels of biodiversity conservation for the co-construction of research agendas and the exchange of knowledge. These collaborations also bring out some challenges. Inter-knowledge and mutual learning remain difficult at scales larger than that of the teams concerned. The staff working at this interface needs to possess good listening skills, respect all partners' needs and demonstrate flexibility. Knowledge exchanges require time, thus reducing productivity according to quantitative metrics such as scientific publications or institutional reports. These collaborations can therefore be difficult to assume socially, and remain tenuous because they rely on a good understanding of the differences in governance of the various partners. Based on our experience, success is favoured by long-term and close relationships, and by co-construction of projects at early stage. Sharing a space (i.e. office or building) facilitates face-to-face interactions during planned work sessions and casual meetings that build up a shared scientific culture and mutual trust.
format article
topic_facet P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
biodiversité
conservation de la diversité biologique
protection de l'environnement
étude de cas
collaboration
recherche interdisciplinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543
author Couturier, Thibaut
Bauduin, Sarah
Astruc, Guillelme
Blanck, Aurélie
Canonne, Coline
Chambert, Thierry
Chiffard, Jules
Cosquer, Alix
Cubaynes, Sarah
Curtet, Laurence
Dortel, Emmanuelle
Drouet-Hoguet, Nolwenn
Duchamp, Christophe
Francesiaz, Charlotte
Grente, Oksana
Jailloux, Adrien
Kervellec, Maëlis
Lauret, Valentin
Lebreton, Jean Dominique
Louvrier, Julie
Marescot, Lucile
Mathevet, Raphaël
Navas, Marie-Laure
Perrot, Charlotte
Poulet, Nicolas
Quenette, Pierre--Yves
Salas, Michel
Souchay, Guillaume
Vanpé, Cécile
Besnard, Aurélien
Gimenez, Olivier
author_facet Couturier, Thibaut
Bauduin, Sarah
Astruc, Guillelme
Blanck, Aurélie
Canonne, Coline
Chambert, Thierry
Chiffard, Jules
Cosquer, Alix
Cubaynes, Sarah
Curtet, Laurence
Dortel, Emmanuelle
Drouet-Hoguet, Nolwenn
Duchamp, Christophe
Francesiaz, Charlotte
Grente, Oksana
Jailloux, Adrien
Kervellec, Maëlis
Lauret, Valentin
Lebreton, Jean Dominique
Louvrier, Julie
Marescot, Lucile
Mathevet, Raphaël
Navas, Marie-Laure
Perrot, Charlotte
Poulet, Nicolas
Quenette, Pierre--Yves
Salas, Michel
Souchay, Guillaume
Vanpé, Cécile
Besnard, Aurélien
Gimenez, Olivier
author_sort Couturier, Thibaut
title Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
title_short Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
title_full Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
title_fullStr Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
title_full_unstemmed Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France
title_sort building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in france
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/2/Ecol%20Sol%20and%20Evidence%20-%202023%20-%20Couturier%20-%20Building%20spaces%20of%20interactions%20between%20researchers%20and%20managers%20%20Case%20studies.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT couturierthibaut buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT bauduinsarah buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT astrucguillelme buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT blanckaurelie buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT canonnecoline buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT chambertthierry buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT chiffardjules buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT cosqueralix buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT cubaynessarah buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT curtetlaurence buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT dortelemmanuelle buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT drouethoguetnolwenn buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT duchampchristophe buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT francesiazcharlotte buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT grenteoksana buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT jaillouxadrien buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT kervellecmaelis buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT lauretvalentin buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT lebretonjeandominique buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT louvrierjulie buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT marescotlucile buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT mathevetraphael buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT navasmarielaure buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT perrotcharlotte buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT pouletnicolas buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT quenettepierreyves buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT salasmichel buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT souchayguillaume buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT vanpececile buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT besnardaurelien buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
AT gimenezolivier buildingspacesofinteractionsbetweenresearchersandmanagerscasestudieswithwildlifemonitoringandconservationinfrance
_version_ 1792500720372547584
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6078952024-02-14T15:25:21Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/ Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France. Couturier Thibaut, Bauduin Sarah, Astruc Guillelme, Blanck Aurélie, Canonne Coline, Chambert Thierry, Chiffard Jules, Cosquer Alix, Cubaynes Sarah, Curtet Laurence, Dortel Emmanuelle, Drouet-Hoguet Nolwenn, Duchamp Christophe, Francesiaz Charlotte, Grente Oksana, Jailloux Adrien, Kervellec Maëlis, Lauret Valentin, Lebreton Jean Dominique, Louvrier Julie, Marescot Lucile, Mathevet Raphaël, Navas Marie-Laure, Perrot Charlotte, Poulet Nicolas, Quenette Pierre--Yves, Salas Michel, Souchay Guillaume, Vanpé Cécile, Besnard Aurélien, Gimenez Olivier. 2023. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 4 (2):e12245, 8 p.https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12245 <https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12245> Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France Couturier, Thibaut Bauduin, Sarah Astruc, Guillelme Blanck, Aurélie Canonne, Coline Chambert, Thierry Chiffard, Jules Cosquer, Alix Cubaynes, Sarah Curtet, Laurence Dortel, Emmanuelle Drouet-Hoguet, Nolwenn Duchamp, Christophe Francesiaz, Charlotte Grente, Oksana Jailloux, Adrien Kervellec, Maëlis Lauret, Valentin Lebreton, Jean Dominique Louvrier, Julie Marescot, Lucile Mathevet, Raphaël Navas, Marie-Laure Perrot, Charlotte Poulet, Nicolas Quenette, Pierre--Yves Salas, Michel Souchay, Guillaume Vanpé, Cécile Besnard, Aurélien Gimenez, Olivier eng 2023 Ecological Solutions and Evidence P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières biodiversité conservation de la diversité biologique protection de l'environnement étude de cas collaboration recherche interdisciplinaire http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15898 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24392 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_fc567bfb http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24402 France La Réunion http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6543 To document and halt biodiversity loss, monitoring, quantifying trends and assessing management and conservation strategies on wildlife populations and communities are crucial steps. With increasing technological innovations, more and more data are collected and new quantitative methods are constantly developed. These rapid developments come with an increasing need for analytical skills, which are hardly accessible to managers. On the other hand, researchers spend more and more time on research grant applications and administrative tasks, which leaves fewer opportunities for knowledge transfer. This situation tends to increase the gap between researchers and managers. Here, we illustrate how to fill this gap by presenting two long-term collaborations between a research unit—Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology; CEFE—and a national agency—French Biodiversity Agency; OFB. The first example is a collaboration providing statistical support to national parks for the design and implementation of scientific monitoring protocols. It relies on the recruitment of a research engineer funded by OFB and physically based at CEFE, who works closely with OFB and managers. The second example is a collaboration on the management of large carnivores. For more than 10 years, it has involved several PhD students and post-doctoral fellows co-supervised by CEFE and OFB, and has recently resulted in the recruitment of a permanent OFB researcher who works half-time at CEFE and half-time at OFB. These case studies illustrate the modalities of collaborative work between public institutions acting at different levels of biodiversity conservation for the co-construction of research agendas and the exchange of knowledge. These collaborations also bring out some challenges. Inter-knowledge and mutual learning remain difficult at scales larger than that of the teams concerned. The staff working at this interface needs to possess good listening skills, respect all partners' needs and demonstrate flexibility. Knowledge exchanges require time, thus reducing productivity according to quantitative metrics such as scientific publications or institutional reports. These collaborations can therefore be difficult to assume socially, and remain tenuous because they rely on a good understanding of the differences in governance of the various partners. Based on our experience, success is favoured by long-term and close relationships, and by co-construction of projects at early stage. Sharing a space (i.e. office or building) facilitates face-to-face interactions during planned work sessions and casual meetings that build up a shared scientific culture and mutual trust. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607895/2/Ecol%20Sol%20and%20Evidence%20-%202023%20-%20Couturier%20-%20Building%20spaces%20of%20interactions%20between%20researchers%20and%20managers%20%20Case%20studies.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12245 10.1002/2688-8319.12245 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/2688-8319.12245 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12245 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement///ANR-16-CE02-0007//(FRA) Effets de la gestion et du climat sur la dynamique des communautés - Développement d'une démographie multi-espèce./DEMOCOM