Resilience reconciled

Resilience scholarship continues to inspire opaque discourse and competing frameworks often inconsistent with the complexity inherent in social–ecological systems. We contend that competing conceptualizations of resilience are reconcilable, and that the core theory is useful for navigating sustainability challenges.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allen, Craig R., Angeler, David G., Chaffin, Brian C., Twidwell, Dirac, Garmestani, Ahjond
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2019-10
Subjects:social–ecological systems, sustainability,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105445
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Resilience scholarship continues to inspire opaque discourse and competing frameworks often inconsistent with the complexity inherent in social–ecological systems. We contend that competing conceptualizations of resilience are reconcilable, and that the core theory is useful for navigating sustainability challenges.