Inequalities and participation in the digital society: online experiences among children and adolescents in Brazil and Chile
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the Global Kids Online research network data from Brazil and Chile in 2016 relating to children’s digital access, uses and skills. Results show that high-frequency users tend to be from higher socioeconomic groups. Girls and higher-income children perceive higher levels of risk on the Internet. The most common areas of use are related to learning and social life. The type of guidance that children receive matters: active mediation strategies at home and school are vital for increasing children’s digital opportunities, while restrictive mediation tends to reduce them. Also, parental mediation appears to be unequally distributed, showing differences by age, gender and socioeconomic group. These results contribute to discussions on promoting digital opportunities and reducing risks.
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Texto biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022-08
|
| Subjects: | SOCIEDAD DE LA INFORMACION, NIÑOS, ADOLESCENTES, INTERNET, REDES SOCIALES, TECNOLOGIA DIGITAL, BRECHA DIGITAL, IGUALDAD DE OPORTUNIDADES, HOGARES, ESCUELAS, INDICADORES TIC, INFORMATION SOCIETY, CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS, SOCIAL MEDIA, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, DIGITAL DIVIDE, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, HOUSEHOLDS, SCHOOLS, ICT INDICATORS, |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11362/48589 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper presents a comparative analysis of the Global Kids Online research network data from Brazil and Chile in 2016 relating to children’s digital access, uses and skills. Results show that high-frequency users tend to be from higher socioeconomic groups. Girls and higher-income children perceive higher levels of risk on the Internet. The most common areas of use are related to learning and social life. The type of guidance that children receive matters: active mediation strategies at home and school are vital for increasing children’s digital opportunities, while restrictive mediation tends to reduce them. Also, parental mediation appears to be unequally distributed, showing differences by age, gender and socioeconomic group. These results contribute to discussions on promoting digital opportunities and reducing risks. |
|---|