The effect of cocoa swollen-shoot virus on the growth and yield of Amelonado and Amazon cocoa (Theobroma cacao) in Ghana
The virulent strain A of cocoa swollen-shoot virus (CSSV) severely decreased the growth and yield of Amelonado cocoa (Theobroma cacao) trees kept free of capsids (Distantiella theobroma and Sahlbergella singularis) and the dieback fungus (Calonectria rigidiuscula) in Ghana. Fifteen per cent of graft-inoculated Amelonado trees showed symptoms within 4 months, and 48, 80 and 100 per cent within 6, 12 and 20 months, respectively. Infected trees, whether shaded or unshaded, began to decline 6 months after infection, and deteriorated rapidly during the next 27 months by which time 16 per cent had died and most others were moribund; fertilizer applications had no significant effect on the rate at which infected trees deteriorated. Yields of pods and dry cocoa were greatly reduced 2 yr after infection and were very low after 3 yr; yields were significantly reduced by virus infection but there were no significant further effects of applying fertilizer. These results confirm that CSSV strain A alone is very damaging and often eventually lethal to Amelonado trees in Ghana, and indicate that the conflicting results obtained previously in Ghana and Nigeria were probably due to differences in the virulence of the CSSV strains tested. In contrast, the virus had much less effect on cocoa trees of the Amazon type; only 3 per cent of graft-inoculated Amazon trees showed symptoms within 4 months, and 43, 84 and 97 per cent after 1, 2 and 3 yr, respectively. Slight deterioration of tree canopies was first detected c. 15 months after infection and, although it continued slowly during the next 21 months, the decline was much less severe than that of Amelonado trees. Yields of both unshaded and shaded trees were apparently reduced by virus infection, but yield losses were much smaller than those of Amelonado trees. These results support the present objectives of controlling the spread of CSSV in Ghana by roguing infected trees, and selecting cultivars with greater tolerance to infection for future use
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | biblioteca |
| Published: |
1975
|
| Subjects: | THEOBROMA CACAO, COCOA SWOLLEN SHOOT VIRUS, VIROSIS, INOCULACION, PODER PATOGENO, CLONES AMELONADOS, CLONES DEL ALTO AMAZONAS, ETAPAS DE DESARROLLO DE LA PLANTA, RENDIMIENTO, GHANA, |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The virulent strain A of cocoa swollen-shoot virus (CSSV) severely decreased the growth and yield of Amelonado cocoa (Theobroma cacao) trees kept free of capsids (Distantiella theobroma and Sahlbergella singularis) and the dieback fungus (Calonectria rigidiuscula) in Ghana. Fifteen per cent of graft-inoculated Amelonado trees showed symptoms within 4 months, and 48, 80 and 100 per cent within 6, 12 and 20 months, respectively. Infected trees, whether shaded or unshaded, began to decline 6 months after infection, and deteriorated rapidly during the next 27 months by which time 16 per cent had died and most others were moribund; fertilizer applications had no significant effect on the rate at which infected trees deteriorated. Yields of pods and dry cocoa were greatly reduced 2 yr after infection and were very low after 3 yr; yields were significantly reduced by virus infection but there were no significant further effects of applying fertilizer. These results confirm that CSSV strain A alone is very damaging and often eventually lethal to Amelonado trees in Ghana, and indicate that the conflicting results obtained previously in Ghana and Nigeria were probably due to differences in the virulence of the CSSV strains tested. In contrast, the virus had much less effect on cocoa trees of the Amazon type; only 3 per cent of graft-inoculated Amazon trees showed symptoms within 4 months, and 43, 84 and 97 per cent after 1, 2 and 3 yr, respectively. Slight deterioration of tree canopies was first detected c. 15 months after infection and, although it continued slowly during the next 21 months, the decline was much less severe than that of Amelonado trees. Yields of both unshaded and shaded trees were apparently reduced by virus infection, but yield losses were much smaller than those of Amelonado trees. These results support the present objectives of controlling the spread of CSSV in Ghana by roguing infected trees, and selecting cultivars with greater tolerance to infection for future use |
|---|