Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study is necessary considering the expressive number of rural workers that are not assisted by a health professional despite the presence of musculoskeletal changes such as low back pain. Thus, the objective was to check if there is a relationship among low back pain levels, anthropometric measures and range of motion of rural workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with rural workers that used the visual analog scale to measure low back pain. The data on body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and visceral fat area were obtained, as well as the assessment of posterior chain range of motion. RESULTS: Fifty-five rural workers were evaluated, with a predominance of women and married. Of the subjects evaluated, 37 (67.3%) reported low back pain, with an average pain of 3.4±2.7. More than half of the sample presented values of body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio considered undesirable. Those with pain had higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area. CONCLUSION: Rural workers with low back pain presented higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area, as well as those with an inadequate range of motion in the same region who had higher values of visceral fat area and pain. It is also possible to infer that there is an association between the values of body mass index and visceral fat area with the level of pain, just as the waist-hip ratio is associated with the levels of the range of motion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nepomuceno,Patrik, Schmidt,Luíza Müller, Glänzel,Marcelo Henrique, Reckziegel,Miriam Beatrís, Pohl,Hildegard Hedwig, Reuter,Éboni Marília
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922019000200117
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2595-31922019000200117
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2595-319220190002001172019-06-13Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workersNepomuceno,PatrikSchmidt,Luíza MüllerGlänzel,Marcelo HenriqueReckziegel,Miriam BeatrísPohl,Hildegard HedwigReuter,Éboni Marília Anthropometry Farmers Low back pain Range of motion ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study is necessary considering the expressive number of rural workers that are not assisted by a health professional despite the presence of musculoskeletal changes such as low back pain. Thus, the objective was to check if there is a relationship among low back pain levels, anthropometric measures and range of motion of rural workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with rural workers that used the visual analog scale to measure low back pain. The data on body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and visceral fat area were obtained, as well as the assessment of posterior chain range of motion. RESULTS: Fifty-five rural workers were evaluated, with a predominance of women and married. Of the subjects evaluated, 37 (67.3%) reported low back pain, with an average pain of 3.4±2.7. More than half of the sample presented values of body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio considered undesirable. Those with pain had higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area. CONCLUSION: Rural workers with low back pain presented higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area, as well as those with an inadequate range of motion in the same region who had higher values of visceral fat area and pain. It is also possible to infer that there is an association between the values of body mass index and visceral fat area with the level of pain, just as the waist-hip ratio is associated with the levels of the range of motion.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da DorBrJP v.2 n.2 20192019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922019000200117en10.5935/2595-0118.20190022
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Nepomuceno,Patrik
Schmidt,Luíza Müller
Glänzel,Marcelo Henrique
Reckziegel,Miriam Beatrís
Pohl,Hildegard Hedwig
Reuter,Éboni Marília
spellingShingle Nepomuceno,Patrik
Schmidt,Luíza Müller
Glänzel,Marcelo Henrique
Reckziegel,Miriam Beatrís
Pohl,Hildegard Hedwig
Reuter,Éboni Marília
Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
author_facet Nepomuceno,Patrik
Schmidt,Luíza Müller
Glänzel,Marcelo Henrique
Reckziegel,Miriam Beatrís
Pohl,Hildegard Hedwig
Reuter,Éboni Marília
author_sort Nepomuceno,Patrik
title Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
title_short Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
title_full Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
title_fullStr Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
title_full_unstemmed Low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
title_sort low back pain, anthropometric indexes and range of motion of rural workers
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study is necessary considering the expressive number of rural workers that are not assisted by a health professional despite the presence of musculoskeletal changes such as low back pain. Thus, the objective was to check if there is a relationship among low back pain levels, anthropometric measures and range of motion of rural workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with rural workers that used the visual analog scale to measure low back pain. The data on body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and visceral fat area were obtained, as well as the assessment of posterior chain range of motion. RESULTS: Fifty-five rural workers were evaluated, with a predominance of women and married. Of the subjects evaluated, 37 (67.3%) reported low back pain, with an average pain of 3.4±2.7. More than half of the sample presented values of body mass index, fat percentage, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio considered undesirable. Those with pain had higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area. CONCLUSION: Rural workers with low back pain presented higher values of body mass index and visceral fat area, as well as those with an inadequate range of motion in the same region who had higher values of visceral fat area and pain. It is also possible to infer that there is an association between the values of body mass index and visceral fat area with the level of pain, just as the waist-hip ratio is associated with the levels of the range of motion.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922019000200117
work_keys_str_mv AT nepomucenopatrik lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
AT schmidtluizamuller lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
AT glanzelmarcelohenrique lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
AT reckziegelmiriambeatris lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
AT pohlhildegardhedwig lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
AT reuterebonimarilia lowbackpainanthropometricindexesandrangeofmotionofruralworkers
_version_ 1756442111365873664