Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garg,Amit Kumar, Agrawal,Neha, Wadhwani,Kulwinder Kaur, Tikku,Aseem Prakash
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100387
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1983-46322021000100387
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1983-463220210001003872021-07-28Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo StudyGarg,Amit KumarAgrawal,NehaWadhwani,Kulwinder KaurTikku,Aseem Prakash Endodontics Molar Dental Pulp Cavity Root Canal Therapy ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde BucalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada v.21 20212021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100387en10.1590/pboci.2021.111
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Garg,Amit Kumar
Agrawal,Neha
Wadhwani,Kulwinder Kaur
Tikku,Aseem Prakash
spellingShingle Garg,Amit Kumar
Agrawal,Neha
Wadhwani,Kulwinder Kaur
Tikku,Aseem Prakash
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
author_facet Garg,Amit Kumar
Agrawal,Neha
Wadhwani,Kulwinder Kaur
Tikku,Aseem Prakash
author_sort Garg,Amit Kumar
title Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
title_short Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
title_full Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
title_sort comparison of detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar using various techniques: an in-vivo study
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices.
publisher Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100387
work_keys_str_mv AT gargamitkumar comparisonofdetectionrateofrootcanalorificesofmaxillaryfirstmolarusingvarioustechniquesaninvivostudy
AT agrawalneha comparisonofdetectionrateofrootcanalorificesofmaxillaryfirstmolarusingvarioustechniquesaninvivostudy
AT wadhwanikulwinderkaur comparisonofdetectionrateofrootcanalorificesofmaxillaryfirstmolarusingvarioustechniquesaninvivostudy
AT tikkuaseemprakash comparisonofdetectionrateofrootcanalorificesofmaxillaryfirstmolarusingvarioustechniquesaninvivostudy
_version_ 1756436594047320064