OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL

ABSTRACT Objective: The thoracolumbar spine trauma represents 30% of spinal diseases. To compare the minimally invasive technique with the open technique in lumbar fractures. Method: A prospective, cross-sectional, comparative observational study, which evaluated the following variables: surgery time, length of hospital stay, transoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, analyzed by SPSS software using Student's t test with statistical significance of p ≥ 0.05, with 24 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures, randomly treated with percutaneous pedicle screws and by open technique with a transpedicular system. Results: The surgery time was 90 minutes for the minimally invasive technique and 60 minutes for the open technique, the bleeding was on average 50 cm3 vs. 400 cm3. The mean visual analogue scale for pain at 24 hours of surgery was 5 for the minimally invasive group vs. 8 for the open group. The number of fluoroscopic projections of pedicle screws was 220 in the minimally invasive technique vs. 100 in the traditional technique. Quantified bleeding was minimal for percutaneous access vs. 340 cm3 for the traditional system. The hospital discharge for the minimally invasive group was at 24 hours and at 72 hours for those treated with open surgery. Conclusions: It is a technique that requires longer surgical time, with reports of less bleeding, less postoperative pain and less time for hospital discharge, reasons why it is supposed to be a procedure that requires a learning curve, statistical significance with respect to bleeding, visual analogue scale for pain and showed no significant difference in the variables of surgical time.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oviedo,José Enrique Salcedo, Luna,Luis Muñiz, Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán, Álvarez,Jorge Salvador De la Cruz, Sámano,Hugo Vilchis, Vega,Juvenal Ordaz, Salgado,Yadira Bahena, Valerio,Mario Alonso Cienega, Barbarin,Emilio
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000200133
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1808-18512017000200133
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1808-185120170002001332017-06-21OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITALOviedo,José Enrique SalcedoLuna,Luis MuñizHeredia,Marco Antonio MarbánÁlvarez,Jorge Salvador De la CruzSámano,Hugo VilchisVega,Juvenal OrdazSalgado,Yadira BahenaValerio,Mario Alonso CienegaBarbarin,Emilio Spinal fractures Surgical procedures, operative Minimally invasive surgical procedures. ABSTRACT Objective: The thoracolumbar spine trauma represents 30% of spinal diseases. To compare the minimally invasive technique with the open technique in lumbar fractures. Method: A prospective, cross-sectional, comparative observational study, which evaluated the following variables: surgery time, length of hospital stay, transoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, analyzed by SPSS software using Student's t test with statistical significance of p ≥ 0.05, with 24 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures, randomly treated with percutaneous pedicle screws and by open technique with a transpedicular system. Results: The surgery time was 90 minutes for the minimally invasive technique and 60 minutes for the open technique, the bleeding was on average 50 cm3 vs. 400 cm3. The mean visual analogue scale for pain at 24 hours of surgery was 5 for the minimally invasive group vs. 8 for the open group. The number of fluoroscopic projections of pedicle screws was 220 in the minimally invasive technique vs. 100 in the traditional technique. Quantified bleeding was minimal for percutaneous access vs. 340 cm3 for the traditional system. The hospital discharge for the minimally invasive group was at 24 hours and at 72 hours for those treated with open surgery. Conclusions: It is a technique that requires longer surgical time, with reports of less bleeding, less postoperative pain and less time for hospital discharge, reasons why it is supposed to be a procedure that requires a learning curve, statistical significance with respect to bleeding, visual analogue scale for pain and showed no significant difference in the variables of surgical time.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ColunaColuna/Columna v.16 n.2 20172017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000200133en10.1590/s1808-185120171602172299
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Oviedo,José Enrique Salcedo
Luna,Luis Muñiz
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Álvarez,Jorge Salvador De la Cruz
Sámano,Hugo Vilchis
Vega,Juvenal Ordaz
Salgado,Yadira Bahena
Valerio,Mario Alonso Cienega
Barbarin,Emilio
spellingShingle Oviedo,José Enrique Salcedo
Luna,Luis Muñiz
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Álvarez,Jorge Salvador De la Cruz
Sámano,Hugo Vilchis
Vega,Juvenal Ordaz
Salgado,Yadira Bahena
Valerio,Mario Alonso Cienega
Barbarin,Emilio
OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
author_facet Oviedo,José Enrique Salcedo
Luna,Luis Muñiz
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Álvarez,Jorge Salvador De la Cruz
Sámano,Hugo Vilchis
Vega,Juvenal Ordaz
Salgado,Yadira Bahena
Valerio,Mario Alonso Cienega
Barbarin,Emilio
author_sort Oviedo,José Enrique Salcedo
title OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
title_short OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
title_full OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
title_fullStr OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
title_full_unstemmed OPEN SURGICAL VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR AO FRACTURES TYPE A AND B1 IN A REFERENCE HOSPITAL
title_sort open surgical vs. minimally invasive treatment of thoracolumbar ao fractures type a and b1 in a reference hospital
description ABSTRACT Objective: The thoracolumbar spine trauma represents 30% of spinal diseases. To compare the minimally invasive technique with the open technique in lumbar fractures. Method: A prospective, cross-sectional, comparative observational study, which evaluated the following variables: surgery time, length of hospital stay, transoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, analyzed by SPSS software using Student's t test with statistical significance of p ≥ 0.05, with 24 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures, randomly treated with percutaneous pedicle screws and by open technique with a transpedicular system. Results: The surgery time was 90 minutes for the minimally invasive technique and 60 minutes for the open technique, the bleeding was on average 50 cm3 vs. 400 cm3. The mean visual analogue scale for pain at 24 hours of surgery was 5 for the minimally invasive group vs. 8 for the open group. The number of fluoroscopic projections of pedicle screws was 220 in the minimally invasive technique vs. 100 in the traditional technique. Quantified bleeding was minimal for percutaneous access vs. 340 cm3 for the traditional system. The hospital discharge for the minimally invasive group was at 24 hours and at 72 hours for those treated with open surgery. Conclusions: It is a technique that requires longer surgical time, with reports of less bleeding, less postoperative pain and less time for hospital discharge, reasons why it is supposed to be a procedure that requires a learning curve, statistical significance with respect to bleeding, visual analogue scale for pain and showed no significant difference in the variables of surgical time.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000200133
work_keys_str_mv AT oviedojoseenriquesalcedo opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT lunaluismuniz opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT herediamarcoantoniomarban opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT alvarezjorgesalvadordelacruz opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT samanohugovilchis opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT vegajuvenalordaz opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT salgadoyadirabahena opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT valeriomarioalonsocienega opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
AT barbarinemilio opensurgicalvsminimallyinvasivetreatmentofthoracolumbaraofracturestypeaandb1inareferencehospital
_version_ 1756432986837876736