Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy

PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim, Dénes,Francisco T., Nahas,William Carlos, Simões,Fabiano A., Colombo Jr.,José Roberto, Piovesan,Affonso C., Chambô,José L., Arap,Sami, Srougi,Miguel
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000100005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-59322009000100005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-593220090001000052009-06-18Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomyMitre,Anuar IbrahimDénes,Francisco T.Nahas,William CarlosSimões,Fabiano A.Colombo Jr.,José RobertoPiovesan,Affonso C.Chambô,José L.Arap,SamiSrougi,Miguel Donor nephrectomy Kidney transplantation Laparoscopy Surgical approaches Outcomes PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.64 n.1 20092009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000100005en10.1590/S1807-59322009000100005
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Dénes,Francisco T.
Nahas,William Carlos
Simões,Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr.,José Roberto
Piovesan,Affonso C.
Chambô,José L.
Arap,Sami
Srougi,Miguel
spellingShingle Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Dénes,Francisco T.
Nahas,William Carlos
Simões,Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr.,José Roberto
Piovesan,Affonso C.
Chambô,José L.
Arap,Sami
Srougi,Miguel
Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
author_facet Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
Dénes,Francisco T.
Nahas,William Carlos
Simões,Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr.,José Roberto
Piovesan,Affonso C.
Chambô,José L.
Arap,Sami
Srougi,Miguel
author_sort Mitre,Anuar Ibrahim
title Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_short Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_full Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_fullStr Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_sort comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
description PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p<0.001), whereas patients of the flank incision group presented more postoperative pain (p=0.035), required more analgesics (p<0.001), had longer hospital stays (p<0.001), and suffered more pain on the 90th day after surgery (p=0.006). In the sub-costal and flank incision groups, there was a larger number of paraesthesias and abdominal wall asymmetries (p<0.001). Recipient groups were demographically comparable and presented similar acute tubular necrosis incidence and delayed graft function. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in the video-laparoscopic and flank incision groups (p=0.013). There was no difference in serum creatinine levels, surgical complications, or recipient or graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The video-laparoscopic and sub-costal approaches proved to be safe, and to provide donor advantages relative to the flank incision approach. Among recipients, the complication rate, graft survival, and recipient survival were similar in all groups.
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000100005
work_keys_str_mv AT mitreanuaribrahim comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT denesfranciscot comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT nahaswilliamcarlos comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT simoesfabianoa comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT colombojrjoseroberto comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT piovesanaffonsoc comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT chambojosel comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT arapsami comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
AT srougimiguel comparativeandprospectiveanalysisofthreedifferentapproachesforlivedonornephrectomy
_version_ 1756432032862306304