Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (PR) in diagnosing external root resorption (ERR) in human permanent teeth replanted after traumatic avulsion. The samples comprised 39 permanent maxillary incisors replanted after traumatic avulsion. Digital PR and CBCT images were taken from each tooth and independently examined by 2 calibrated examiners to assess the ERR activity regarding type and extension. The degrees of agreement between both imaging examinations were determined by the mean global agreement index using SPSS software. The two imaging examinations diverged greatly in the diagnosis of the type of ERR since CBCT identified more cases as inflammatory ERR and PR as replacement ERR. A discordance level of 69.2% was observed between the two methods in the diagnosis of the type of ERR when CBCT for mesial and distal (MD) surfaces was considered and 61.5% when CBCT for mesial, distal, buccal and lingual (MD/BL) was considered. Likewise, CBCT and PR differed regarding the ERR index. PR examinations classified most cases as moderate or severe (69.2%), while CBCT examinations classified more cases as mild either in the MD surfaces analysis (41.4%) or in the analysis of the MD-BL surfaces (51.3%). In conclusion, the present results highlight a discrepancy between CBCT and digital PR performance in the diagnosis of different types and extent of ERR in replanted teeth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BASTOS,Juliana Vilela, QUEIROZ,Vanda Helena de Faria, FELÍCIO,Donnersson Bruno Alves, FERREIRA,Daniela Augusta Barbato, BRASILEIRO,Cláudia Borges, ABDO,Evandro Neves, AMARAL,Tânia Mara Pimenta
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100254
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-832420200001002542020-07-13Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teethBASTOS,Juliana VilelaQUEIROZ,Vanda Helena de FariaFELÍCIO,Donnersson Bruno AlvesFERREIRA,Daniela Augusta BarbatoBRASILEIRO,Cláudia BorgesABDO,Evandro NevesAMARAL,Tânia Mara Pimenta Traumatology Radiography Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (PR) in diagnosing external root resorption (ERR) in human permanent teeth replanted after traumatic avulsion. The samples comprised 39 permanent maxillary incisors replanted after traumatic avulsion. Digital PR and CBCT images were taken from each tooth and independently examined by 2 calibrated examiners to assess the ERR activity regarding type and extension. The degrees of agreement between both imaging examinations were determined by the mean global agreement index using SPSS software. The two imaging examinations diverged greatly in the diagnosis of the type of ERR since CBCT identified more cases as inflammatory ERR and PR as replacement ERR. A discordance level of 69.2% was observed between the two methods in the diagnosis of the type of ERR when CBCT for mesial and distal (MD) surfaces was considered and 61.5% when CBCT for mesial, distal, buccal and lingual (MD/BL) was considered. Likewise, CBCT and PR differed regarding the ERR index. PR examinations classified most cases as moderate or severe (69.2%), while CBCT examinations classified more cases as mild either in the MD surfaces analysis (41.4%) or in the analysis of the MD-BL surfaces (51.3%). In conclusion, the present results highlight a discrepancy between CBCT and digital PR performance in the diagnosis of different types and extent of ERR in replanted teeth.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.34 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100254en10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0067
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author BASTOS,Juliana Vilela
QUEIROZ,Vanda Helena de Faria
FELÍCIO,Donnersson Bruno Alves
FERREIRA,Daniela Augusta Barbato
BRASILEIRO,Cláudia Borges
ABDO,Evandro Neves
AMARAL,Tânia Mara Pimenta
spellingShingle BASTOS,Juliana Vilela
QUEIROZ,Vanda Helena de Faria
FELÍCIO,Donnersson Bruno Alves
FERREIRA,Daniela Augusta Barbato
BRASILEIRO,Cláudia Borges
ABDO,Evandro Neves
AMARAL,Tânia Mara Pimenta
Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
author_facet BASTOS,Juliana Vilela
QUEIROZ,Vanda Helena de Faria
FELÍCIO,Donnersson Bruno Alves
FERREIRA,Daniela Augusta Barbato
BRASILEIRO,Cláudia Borges
ABDO,Evandro Neves
AMARAL,Tânia Mara Pimenta
author_sort BASTOS,Juliana Vilela
title Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
title_short Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
title_full Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
title_fullStr Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
title_full_unstemmed Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
title_sort imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth
description Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (PR) in diagnosing external root resorption (ERR) in human permanent teeth replanted after traumatic avulsion. The samples comprised 39 permanent maxillary incisors replanted after traumatic avulsion. Digital PR and CBCT images were taken from each tooth and independently examined by 2 calibrated examiners to assess the ERR activity regarding type and extension. The degrees of agreement between both imaging examinations were determined by the mean global agreement index using SPSS software. The two imaging examinations diverged greatly in the diagnosis of the type of ERR since CBCT identified more cases as inflammatory ERR and PR as replacement ERR. A discordance level of 69.2% was observed between the two methods in the diagnosis of the type of ERR when CBCT for mesial and distal (MD) surfaces was considered and 61.5% when CBCT for mesial, distal, buccal and lingual (MD/BL) was considered. Likewise, CBCT and PR differed regarding the ERR index. PR examinations classified most cases as moderate or severe (69.2%), while CBCT examinations classified more cases as mild either in the MD surfaces analysis (41.4%) or in the analysis of the MD-BL surfaces (51.3%). In conclusion, the present results highlight a discrepancy between CBCT and digital PR performance in the diagnosis of different types and extent of ERR in replanted teeth.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100254
work_keys_str_mv AT bastosjulianavilela imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT queirozvandahelenadefaria imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT feliciodonnerssonbrunoalves imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT ferreiradanielaaugustabarbato imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT brasileiroclaudiaborges imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT abdoevandroneves imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
AT amaraltaniamarapimenta imagingdiagnosisofexternalrootresorptioninreplantedpermanentteeth
_version_ 1756431660903038976