Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effects of manual chest compression (MCC) on the expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure (PEEP-ZEEP) airway clearance maneuver applied in patients on mechanical ventilation. The flow bias, which influences pulmonary secretion removal, is evaluated by the ratio and difference between the peak expiratory flow (PEF) and the peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Methods: This was a crossover randomized study involving 10 patients. The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver was applied at four time points, one without MCC and the other three with MCC, which were performed by three different respiratory therapists. Respiratory mechanics data were obtained with a specific monitor. Results: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver without MCC was enough to exceed the threshold that is considered necessary to move secretion toward the glottis (PEF − PIF difference > 33 L/min): a mean PEF − PIF difference of 49.1 ± 9.4 L/min was achieved. The mean PEF/PIF ratio achieved was 3.3 ± 0.7. Using MCC with PEEP-ZEEP increased the mean PEF − PIF difference by 6.7 ± 3.4 L/min. We found a moderate correlation between respiratory therapist hand grip strength and the flow bias generated with MCC. No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects were found. Conclusions: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver, without MCC, resulted in an expiratory flow bias superior to that necessary to facilitate pulmonary secretion removal. Combining MCC with the PEEP-ZEEP maneuver increased the expiratory flow bias, which increases the potential of the maneuver to remove secretions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliveira,Ana Carolina Otoni, Lorena,Daiane Menezes, Gomes,Lívia Corrêa, Amaral,Bianca Lorrane Reges, Volpe,Márcia Souza
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132019000300200
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-37132019000300200
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-371320190003002002019-03-07Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilationOliveira,Ana Carolina OtoniLorena,Daiane MenezesGomes,Lívia CorrêaAmaral,Bianca Lorrane RegesVolpe,Márcia Souza Physical therapy modalities Critical care Respiration, artificial Bodily secretions ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effects of manual chest compression (MCC) on the expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure (PEEP-ZEEP) airway clearance maneuver applied in patients on mechanical ventilation. The flow bias, which influences pulmonary secretion removal, is evaluated by the ratio and difference between the peak expiratory flow (PEF) and the peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Methods: This was a crossover randomized study involving 10 patients. The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver was applied at four time points, one without MCC and the other three with MCC, which were performed by three different respiratory therapists. Respiratory mechanics data were obtained with a specific monitor. Results: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver without MCC was enough to exceed the threshold that is considered necessary to move secretion toward the glottis (PEF − PIF difference > 33 L/min): a mean PEF − PIF difference of 49.1 ± 9.4 L/min was achieved. The mean PEF/PIF ratio achieved was 3.3 ± 0.7. Using MCC with PEEP-ZEEP increased the mean PEF − PIF difference by 6.7 ± 3.4 L/min. We found a moderate correlation between respiratory therapist hand grip strength and the flow bias generated with MCC. No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects were found. Conclusions: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver, without MCC, resulted in an expiratory flow bias superior to that necessary to facilitate pulmonary secretion removal. Combining MCC with the PEEP-ZEEP maneuver increased the expiratory flow bias, which increases the potential of the maneuver to remove secretions.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e TisiologiaJornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.45 n.3 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132019000300200en10.1590/1806-3713/e20180058
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Oliveira,Ana Carolina Otoni
Lorena,Daiane Menezes
Gomes,Lívia Corrêa
Amaral,Bianca Lorrane Reges
Volpe,Márcia Souza
spellingShingle Oliveira,Ana Carolina Otoni
Lorena,Daiane Menezes
Gomes,Lívia Corrêa
Amaral,Bianca Lorrane Reges
Volpe,Márcia Souza
Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
author_facet Oliveira,Ana Carolina Otoni
Lorena,Daiane Menezes
Gomes,Lívia Corrêa
Amaral,Bianca Lorrane Reges
Volpe,Márcia Souza
author_sort Oliveira,Ana Carolina Otoni
title Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
title_short Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
title_full Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
title_fullStr Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
title_sort effects of manual chest compression on expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure maneuver in patients on mechanical ventilation
description ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effects of manual chest compression (MCC) on the expiratory flow bias during the positive end-expiratory pressure-zero end-expiratory pressure (PEEP-ZEEP) airway clearance maneuver applied in patients on mechanical ventilation. The flow bias, which influences pulmonary secretion removal, is evaluated by the ratio and difference between the peak expiratory flow (PEF) and the peak inspiratory flow (PIF). Methods: This was a crossover randomized study involving 10 patients. The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver was applied at four time points, one without MCC and the other three with MCC, which were performed by three different respiratory therapists. Respiratory mechanics data were obtained with a specific monitor. Results: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver without MCC was enough to exceed the threshold that is considered necessary to move secretion toward the glottis (PEF − PIF difference > 33 L/min): a mean PEF − PIF difference of 49.1 ± 9.4 L/min was achieved. The mean PEF/PIF ratio achieved was 3.3 ± 0.7. Using MCC with PEEP-ZEEP increased the mean PEF − PIF difference by 6.7 ± 3.4 L/min. We found a moderate correlation between respiratory therapist hand grip strength and the flow bias generated with MCC. No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects were found. Conclusions: The PEEP-ZEEP maneuver, without MCC, resulted in an expiratory flow bias superior to that necessary to facilitate pulmonary secretion removal. Combining MCC with the PEEP-ZEEP maneuver increased the expiratory flow bias, which increases the potential of the maneuver to remove secretions.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132019000300200
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiraanacarolinaotoni effectsofmanualchestcompressiononexpiratoryflowbiasduringthepositiveendexpiratorypressurezeroendexpiratorypressuremaneuverinpatientsonmechanicalventilation
AT lorenadaianemenezes effectsofmanualchestcompressiononexpiratoryflowbiasduringthepositiveendexpiratorypressurezeroendexpiratorypressuremaneuverinpatientsonmechanicalventilation
AT gomesliviacorrea effectsofmanualchestcompressiononexpiratoryflowbiasduringthepositiveendexpiratorypressurezeroendexpiratorypressuremaneuverinpatientsonmechanicalventilation
AT amaralbiancalorranereges effectsofmanualchestcompressiononexpiratoryflowbiasduringthepositiveendexpiratorypressurezeroendexpiratorypressuremaneuverinpatientsonmechanicalventilation
AT volpemarciasouza effectsofmanualchestcompressiononexpiratoryflowbiasduringthepositiveendexpiratorypressurezeroendexpiratorypressuremaneuverinpatientsonmechanicalventilation
_version_ 1756431119509618688