Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
2008
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000100007 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572008000100007 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1678-775720080001000072008-01-31Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resinsPereira,Rosana AparecidaAraujo,Paulo Amarante deCastañeda-Espinosa,Juan CarlosMondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia Composite resins Shrinkage stress Polymerization Polymerization contraction The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.16 n.1 20082008-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000100007en10.1590/S1678-77572008000100007 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Pereira,Rosana Aparecida Araujo,Paulo Amarante de Castañeda-Espinosa,Juan Carlos Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia |
spellingShingle |
Pereira,Rosana Aparecida Araujo,Paulo Amarante de Castañeda-Espinosa,Juan Carlos Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
author_facet |
Pereira,Rosana Aparecida Araujo,Paulo Amarante de Castañeda-Espinosa,Juan Carlos Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia |
author_sort |
Pereira,Rosana Aparecida |
title |
Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation. |
publisher |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572008000100007 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pereirarosanaaparecida comparativeanalysisoftheshrinkagestressofcompositeresins AT araujopauloamarantede comparativeanalysisoftheshrinkagestressofcompositeresins AT castanedaespinosajuancarlos comparativeanalysisoftheshrinkagestressofcompositeresins AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia comparativeanalysisoftheshrinkagestressofcompositeresins |
_version_ |
1756428777684992000 |