The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine which was the optimal side for the conduit to be placed (right or left colon) for antegrade continence enema implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1999 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent the construction of a catheterizable conduit using the Malone principle (MACE) In 22 cases the conduit was re-implanted in the right colon and in 9 cases in the left colon. There were 20 male patients and 11 female patients, with a mean age of 10.23 years. The follow-up period varied from 3 from 83 months (average 25 months). Right and left implantation of the conduit in the colon were compared with regards to the presence of complications, volume of the solution utilized, frequency of colonic lavage, time needed for performing the enema, and degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: One patient with the conduit in the right colon, using the appendix, lost the mechanism after two month follow-up. Thirty patients remain clean and are all capable of performing self-catheterization. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding the variables studied: complications (p = 1.000), solution volume (p = 0.996), time required (p = 0.790) and patient's rating (p = 0.670). The lavage frequency required for patients with the conduit in the right colon may be lower. CONCLUSION: The MACE principle was considered effective for treating fecal retention and leaks, independent of the implantation site. The success of this surgery appears to be directly related to the patient's motivation and not to the technique utilized.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meyer,Karine F., Macedo,Mauricio, S. Filho,Humberto, Pinto,Thais R., Galvao,Leonan T., Meneses,Quirino C.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2008
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000200011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382008000200011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820080002000112008-10-06The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?Meyer,Karine F.Macedo,MauricioS. Filho,HumbertoPinto,Thais R.Galvao,Leonan T.Meneses,Quirino C. fecal incontinence enema surgery OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine which was the optimal side for the conduit to be placed (right or left colon) for antegrade continence enema implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1999 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent the construction of a catheterizable conduit using the Malone principle (MACE) In 22 cases the conduit was re-implanted in the right colon and in 9 cases in the left colon. There were 20 male patients and 11 female patients, with a mean age of 10.23 years. The follow-up period varied from 3 from 83 months (average 25 months). Right and left implantation of the conduit in the colon were compared with regards to the presence of complications, volume of the solution utilized, frequency of colonic lavage, time needed for performing the enema, and degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: One patient with the conduit in the right colon, using the appendix, lost the mechanism after two month follow-up. Thirty patients remain clean and are all capable of performing self-catheterization. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding the variables studied: complications (p = 1.000), solution volume (p = 0.996), time required (p = 0.790) and patient's rating (p = 0.670). The lavage frequency required for patients with the conduit in the right colon may be lower. CONCLUSION: The MACE principle was considered effective for treating fecal retention and leaks, independent of the implantation site. The success of this surgery appears to be directly related to the patient's motivation and not to the technique utilized.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.34 n.2 20082008-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000200011en10.1590/S1677-55382008000200011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Meyer,Karine F.
Macedo,Mauricio
S. Filho,Humberto
Pinto,Thais R.
Galvao,Leonan T.
Meneses,Quirino C.
spellingShingle Meyer,Karine F.
Macedo,Mauricio
S. Filho,Humberto
Pinto,Thais R.
Galvao,Leonan T.
Meneses,Quirino C.
The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
author_facet Meyer,Karine F.
Macedo,Mauricio
S. Filho,Humberto
Pinto,Thais R.
Galvao,Leonan T.
Meneses,Quirino C.
author_sort Meyer,Karine F.
title The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
title_short The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
title_full The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
title_fullStr The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
title_full_unstemmed The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
title_sort malone antegrade continence enema (mace) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine which was the optimal side for the conduit to be placed (right or left colon) for antegrade continence enema implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1999 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent the construction of a catheterizable conduit using the Malone principle (MACE) In 22 cases the conduit was re-implanted in the right colon and in 9 cases in the left colon. There were 20 male patients and 11 female patients, with a mean age of 10.23 years. The follow-up period varied from 3 from 83 months (average 25 months). Right and left implantation of the conduit in the colon were compared with regards to the presence of complications, volume of the solution utilized, frequency of colonic lavage, time needed for performing the enema, and degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: One patient with the conduit in the right colon, using the appendix, lost the mechanism after two month follow-up. Thirty patients remain clean and are all capable of performing self-catheterization. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding the variables studied: complications (p = 1.000), solution volume (p = 0.996), time required (p = 0.790) and patient's rating (p = 0.670). The lavage frequency required for patients with the conduit in the right colon may be lower. CONCLUSION: The MACE principle was considered effective for treating fecal retention and leaks, independent of the implantation site. The success of this surgery appears to be directly related to the patient's motivation and not to the technique utilized.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000200011
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerkarinef themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT macedomauricio themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT sfilhohumberto themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT pintothaisr themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT galvaoleonant themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT menesesquirinoc themaloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT meyerkarinef maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT macedomauricio maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT sfilhohumberto maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT pintothaisr maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT galvaoleonant maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
AT menesesquirinoc maloneantegradecontinenceenemamaceprincipleinchildrenisitimportantiftheconduitisimplantedintheleftortherightcolon
_version_ 1756428021597732864