Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device

BACKGROUND: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is regularly used as a self-administered airway clearance technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need to teach the correct use of the PEP device and to measure the progress of the success rate of the maneuver after training. METHOD: A PEP system (PariPEP-S Sytem) was used to generate PEP in 30 healthy volunteers. They were instructed by a qualified physical therapist to breathe correctly through the PEP device. Then they were evaluated during a set of ten expirations. Two other evaluations were performed at day 2 and day 8 (before and after feedback). The mean PEP and the success rate were calculated for each set of expirations. The number of maneuvers needed to obtain a correct use was calculated on the first session. RESULTS: An optimal PEP was reached after 7.5 SD 2.7 attempts by all subjects. Success rates and mean pressures were similar between the different sets of expirations (p=0.720 and p=0.326, respectively). Pressure variability was around 10%. After one week, 30% of subjects generated more than two non-optimal pressures in the set of ten expirations. No difference in success rate was observed depending on the evaluations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that good initial training on the use of the PEP device and regular follow-up are required for the subject to reach optimal expiratory pressure.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reychler,Gregory, Jacquemart,Manon, Poncin,William, Aubriot,Anne-Sophie, Liistro,Giuseppe
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552015000600451
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1413-35552015000600451
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1413-355520150006004512015-11-30Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure deviceReychler,GregoryJacquemart,ManonPoncin,WilliamAubriot,Anne-SophieLiistro,Giuseppe physical therapy chest education device BACKGROUND: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is regularly used as a self-administered airway clearance technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need to teach the correct use of the PEP device and to measure the progress of the success rate of the maneuver after training. METHOD: A PEP system (PariPEP-S Sytem) was used to generate PEP in 30 healthy volunteers. They were instructed by a qualified physical therapist to breathe correctly through the PEP device. Then they were evaluated during a set of ten expirations. Two other evaluations were performed at day 2 and day 8 (before and after feedback). The mean PEP and the success rate were calculated for each set of expirations. The number of maneuvers needed to obtain a correct use was calculated on the first session. RESULTS: An optimal PEP was reached after 7.5 SD 2.7 attempts by all subjects. Success rates and mean pressures were similar between the different sets of expirations (p=0.720 and p=0.326, respectively). Pressure variability was around 10%. After one week, 30% of subjects generated more than two non-optimal pressures in the set of ten expirations. No difference in success rate was observed depending on the evaluations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that good initial training on the use of the PEP device and regular follow-up are required for the subject to reach optimal expiratory pressure.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.19 n.6 20152015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552015000600451en10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0111
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Reychler,Gregory
Jacquemart,Manon
Poncin,William
Aubriot,Anne-Sophie
Liistro,Giuseppe
spellingShingle Reychler,Gregory
Jacquemart,Manon
Poncin,William
Aubriot,Anne-Sophie
Liistro,Giuseppe
Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
author_facet Reychler,Gregory
Jacquemart,Manon
Poncin,William
Aubriot,Anne-Sophie
Liistro,Giuseppe
author_sort Reychler,Gregory
title Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
title_short Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
title_full Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
title_fullStr Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
title_full_unstemmed Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
title_sort benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device
description BACKGROUND: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is regularly used as a self-administered airway clearance technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need to teach the correct use of the PEP device and to measure the progress of the success rate of the maneuver after training. METHOD: A PEP system (PariPEP-S Sytem) was used to generate PEP in 30 healthy volunteers. They were instructed by a qualified physical therapist to breathe correctly through the PEP device. Then they were evaluated during a set of ten expirations. Two other evaluations were performed at day 2 and day 8 (before and after feedback). The mean PEP and the success rate were calculated for each set of expirations. The number of maneuvers needed to obtain a correct use was calculated on the first session. RESULTS: An optimal PEP was reached after 7.5 SD 2.7 attempts by all subjects. Success rates and mean pressures were similar between the different sets of expirations (p=0.720 and p=0.326, respectively). Pressure variability was around 10%. After one week, 30% of subjects generated more than two non-optimal pressures in the set of ten expirations. No difference in success rate was observed depending on the evaluations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that good initial training on the use of the PEP device and regular follow-up are required for the subject to reach optimal expiratory pressure.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552015000600451
work_keys_str_mv AT reychlergregory benefitofeducationalfeedbackfortheuseofpositiveexpiratorypressuredevice
AT jacquemartmanon benefitofeducationalfeedbackfortheuseofpositiveexpiratorypressuredevice
AT poncinwilliam benefitofeducationalfeedbackfortheuseofpositiveexpiratorypressuredevice
AT aubriotannesophie benefitofeducationalfeedbackfortheuseofpositiveexpiratorypressuredevice
AT liistrogiuseppe benefitofeducationalfeedbackfortheuseofpositiveexpiratorypressuredevice
_version_ 1756413817237012480