One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical performance and clinical time to restore occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars withbulk-fillresin and conventional resin. A total of 140 class II restorations in primary molars of 65 participants (mean age of 6.7 + 1.5) were placed in two random groups:bulk-filland conventional resin. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at the baseline, 6-month, and one year by a single calibrated examiner, and the clinical restorative time was measured with a digital timer. The success and survival of the restorations were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier graphs. The log-rank test compared the curves. Differences in restorative clinical time were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The level of significance was 5%. After one year, 115 restorations were evaluated. The success probability was 88.7% for Filtek Z350 XT and 85.9% for FiltekTM Bulk-fill, and for the survival probability, Filtek Z350 XT presented 90%, and FiltekTM Bulk-fill presented 93.7%. No significant difference was found between the success and survival curves (p=0.62), (p=0.51). The main reason for failure was marginal adaptation.Bulk-fillresinrequired 30% less time than the conventional resin (p<0.001).Bulk-fillresin presented similar clinical performance to the conventional resin and required less restorative clinical time. It is an option to restore class II lesions of primary molars.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gindri,Larissa D’Olanda, Cassol,Igor Perlin, Fröhlich,Tatiana Tambara, Rocha,Rachel de Oliveira
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402022000600110
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0103-64402022000600110
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0103-644020220006001102022-12-01One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trialGindri,Larissa D’OlandaCassol,Igor PerlinFröhlich,Tatiana TambaraRocha,Rachel de Oliveira criteria survival longevity class II primary teeth Abstract This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical performance and clinical time to restore occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars withbulk-fillresin and conventional resin. A total of 140 class II restorations in primary molars of 65 participants (mean age of 6.7 + 1.5) were placed in two random groups:bulk-filland conventional resin. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at the baseline, 6-month, and one year by a single calibrated examiner, and the clinical restorative time was measured with a digital timer. The success and survival of the restorations were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier graphs. The log-rank test compared the curves. Differences in restorative clinical time were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The level of significance was 5%. After one year, 115 restorations were evaluated. The success probability was 88.7% for Filtek Z350 XT and 85.9% for FiltekTM Bulk-fill, and for the survival probability, Filtek Z350 XT presented 90%, and FiltekTM Bulk-fill presented 93.7%. No significant difference was found between the success and survival curves (p=0.62), (p=0.51). The main reason for failure was marginal adaptation.Bulk-fillresinrequired 30% less time than the conventional resin (p<0.001).Bulk-fillresin presented similar clinical performance to the conventional resin and required less restorative clinical time. It is an option to restore class II lesions of primary molars.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação Odontológica de Ribeirão PretoBrazilian Dental Journal v.33 n.6 20222022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402022000600110en10.1590/0103-6440202205069
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Gindri,Larissa D’Olanda
Cassol,Igor Perlin
Fröhlich,Tatiana Tambara
Rocha,Rachel de Oliveira
spellingShingle Gindri,Larissa D’Olanda
Cassol,Igor Perlin
Fröhlich,Tatiana Tambara
Rocha,Rachel de Oliveira
One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
author_facet Gindri,Larissa D’Olanda
Cassol,Igor Perlin
Fröhlich,Tatiana Tambara
Rocha,Rachel de Oliveira
author_sort Gindri,Larissa D’Olanda
title One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
title_short One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
title_full One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort one-year clinical evaluation of class ii bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
description Abstract This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical performance and clinical time to restore occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars withbulk-fillresin and conventional resin. A total of 140 class II restorations in primary molars of 65 participants (mean age of 6.7 + 1.5) were placed in two random groups:bulk-filland conventional resin. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at the baseline, 6-month, and one year by a single calibrated examiner, and the clinical restorative time was measured with a digital timer. The success and survival of the restorations were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier graphs. The log-rank test compared the curves. Differences in restorative clinical time were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The level of significance was 5%. After one year, 115 restorations were evaluated. The success probability was 88.7% for Filtek Z350 XT and 85.9% for FiltekTM Bulk-fill, and for the survival probability, Filtek Z350 XT presented 90%, and FiltekTM Bulk-fill presented 93.7%. No significant difference was found between the success and survival curves (p=0.62), (p=0.51). The main reason for failure was marginal adaptation.Bulk-fillresinrequired 30% less time than the conventional resin (p<0.001).Bulk-fillresin presented similar clinical performance to the conventional resin and required less restorative clinical time. It is an option to restore class II lesions of primary molars.
publisher Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402022000600110
work_keys_str_mv AT gindrilarissadolanda oneyearclinicalevaluationofclassiibulkfillrestorationsinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cassoligorperlin oneyearclinicalevaluationofclassiibulkfillrestorationsinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT frohlichtatianatambara oneyearclinicalevaluationofclassiibulkfillrestorationsinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rocharacheldeoliveira oneyearclinicalevaluationofclassiibulkfillrestorationsinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1756472070916538368