Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients

Abstract Objective: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy with those of median sternotomy in patients who received a mitral valve replacement (MVR) because of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (RMS). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 128 patients (34% male) with RMS between 2011 and 2015. The median age was 53 years (45; 56). The mean ejection fraction was 58.4±6.3%. All the subjects were divided into two groups - Group 1 contained 78 patients who underwent MVR via minithoracotomy (MT-MVR), while Group 2 contained 50 patients who underwent MVR via median sternotomy (S-MVR). Results: In the MT-MVR group, a mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 72% of cases, while it was implanted in 90% of cases in the S-MVR group (P=0.01). The duration of myocardial ischemia was similar (MT-MVR, 77±24 min; S-MVR, 70±18 min) (P=0.09). However, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was lower in the S-MVR group than in the MT-MVR group (99±24 min and 119±34 min, respectively) (P≤0.001). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization period. Postoperative blood loss was lower in the MT-MVR group (P≤0.001) than in the S-MVR group. There are no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (superficial wound infection, stroke, delirium, pericardial tamponade, pleural puncture, acute kidney insufficiency, and implantation of pacemaker). The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (P=0.6) Conclusion: The minimally invasive approach for RMS is feasible and has an excellent cosmetic effect without increasing the risk of surgical complications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chernov,Igor, Enginoev,Soslan, Koz’min,Dmitry, Magomedov,Gasan, Tarasov,Dmitry, Sá,Michel Pompeu B. O., Weymann,Alexander, Zhigalov,Konstantin
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000200185
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-76382020000200185
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-763820200002001852020-04-28Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 PatientsChernov,IgorEnginoev,SoslanKoz’min,DmitryMagomedov,GasanTarasov,DmitrySá,Michel Pompeu B. O.Weymann,AlexanderZhigalov,Konstantin Mitral Valve Stenosis Mitral Valve-surgery Mini-Thoracotomy Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Prostheses and Implants Hospitalization Postoperative Complications Abstract Objective: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy with those of median sternotomy in patients who received a mitral valve replacement (MVR) because of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (RMS). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 128 patients (34% male) with RMS between 2011 and 2015. The median age was 53 years (45; 56). The mean ejection fraction was 58.4±6.3%. All the subjects were divided into two groups - Group 1 contained 78 patients who underwent MVR via minithoracotomy (MT-MVR), while Group 2 contained 50 patients who underwent MVR via median sternotomy (S-MVR). Results: In the MT-MVR group, a mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 72% of cases, while it was implanted in 90% of cases in the S-MVR group (P=0.01). The duration of myocardial ischemia was similar (MT-MVR, 77±24 min; S-MVR, 70±18 min) (P=0.09). However, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was lower in the S-MVR group than in the MT-MVR group (99±24 min and 119±34 min, respectively) (P≤0.001). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization period. Postoperative blood loss was lower in the MT-MVR group (P≤0.001) than in the S-MVR group. There are no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (superficial wound infection, stroke, delirium, pericardial tamponade, pleural puncture, acute kidney insufficiency, and implantation of pacemaker). The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (P=0.6) Conclusion: The minimally invasive approach for RMS is feasible and has an excellent cosmetic effect without increasing the risk of surgical complications.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia CardiovascularBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.2 20202020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000200185en10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0430
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Chernov,Igor
Enginoev,Soslan
Koz’min,Dmitry
Magomedov,Gasan
Tarasov,Dmitry
Sá,Michel Pompeu B. O.
Weymann,Alexander
Zhigalov,Konstantin
spellingShingle Chernov,Igor
Enginoev,Soslan
Koz’min,Dmitry
Magomedov,Gasan
Tarasov,Dmitry
Sá,Michel Pompeu B. O.
Weymann,Alexander
Zhigalov,Konstantin
Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
author_facet Chernov,Igor
Enginoev,Soslan
Koz’min,Dmitry
Magomedov,Gasan
Tarasov,Dmitry
Sá,Michel Pompeu B. O.
Weymann,Alexander
Zhigalov,Konstantin
author_sort Chernov,Igor
title Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
title_short Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
title_full Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
title_fullStr Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
title_sort minithoracotomy vs. conventional mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis: a single-center analysis of 128 patients
description Abstract Objective: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy with those of median sternotomy in patients who received a mitral valve replacement (MVR) because of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (RMS). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 128 patients (34% male) with RMS between 2011 and 2015. The median age was 53 years (45; 56). The mean ejection fraction was 58.4±6.3%. All the subjects were divided into two groups - Group 1 contained 78 patients who underwent MVR via minithoracotomy (MT-MVR), while Group 2 contained 50 patients who underwent MVR via median sternotomy (S-MVR). Results: In the MT-MVR group, a mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 72% of cases, while it was implanted in 90% of cases in the S-MVR group (P=0.01). The duration of myocardial ischemia was similar (MT-MVR, 77±24 min; S-MVR, 70±18 min) (P=0.09). However, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was lower in the S-MVR group than in the MT-MVR group (99±24 min and 119±34 min, respectively) (P≤0.001). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization period. Postoperative blood loss was lower in the MT-MVR group (P≤0.001) than in the S-MVR group. There are no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (superficial wound infection, stroke, delirium, pericardial tamponade, pleural puncture, acute kidney insufficiency, and implantation of pacemaker). The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (P=0.6) Conclusion: The minimally invasive approach for RMS is feasible and has an excellent cosmetic effect without increasing the risk of surgical complications.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000200185
work_keys_str_mv AT chernovigor minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT enginoevsoslan minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT kozmindmitry minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT magomedovgasan minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT tarasovdmitry minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT samichelpompeubo minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT weymannalexander minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
AT zhigalovkonstantin minithoracotomyvsconventionalmitralvalvesurgeryforrheumaticmitralvalvestenosisasinglecenteranalysisof128patients
_version_ 1756429584366043136