Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco
Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for human-carnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Puma concolor, anthropogenic resistance, connectivity, dry woodland, human-wildlife coexistence, livestock depredation, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/mapping-opportunities-and-barriers-for-coexistence-between-people |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-635252 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-6352522024-10-30 Nanni, A.S. Ghoddousi, Arash Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo Baumann, Matthias Burton, Jamie Camino, Micaela Decarre, Julieta Martello, Felipe Regolin, André Luis Kuemmerle, Tobias Article/Letter to editor Diversity and Distributions 30 (2024) 10 ISSN: 1366-9516 Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco 2024 Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for human-carnivore coexistence beyond protected areas. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/mapping-opportunities-and-barriers-for-coexistence-between-people 10.1111/ddi.13920 https://edepot.wur.nl/675196 Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation |
spellingShingle |
Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation Nanni, A.S. Ghoddousi, Arash Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo Baumann, Matthias Burton, Jamie Camino, Micaela Decarre, Julieta Martello, Felipe Regolin, André Luis Kuemmerle, Tobias Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
description |
Aim: The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human-puma (Puma concolor) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location: Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km2). Methods: We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human-puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results: Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions: We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three-pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for human-carnivore coexistence beyond protected areas. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Puma concolor anthropogenic resistance connectivity dry woodland human-wildlife coexistence livestock depredation |
author |
Nanni, A.S. Ghoddousi, Arash Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo Baumann, Matthias Burton, Jamie Camino, Micaela Decarre, Julieta Martello, Felipe Regolin, André Luis Kuemmerle, Tobias |
author_facet |
Nanni, A.S. Ghoddousi, Arash Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo Baumann, Matthias Burton, Jamie Camino, Micaela Decarre, Julieta Martello, Felipe Regolin, André Luis Kuemmerle, Tobias |
author_sort |
Nanni, A.S. |
title |
Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
title_short |
Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
title_full |
Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
title_fullStr |
Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco |
title_sort |
mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the argentine dry chaco |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/mapping-opportunities-and-barriers-for-coexistence-between-people |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nannias mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT ghoddousiarash mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT romeromunozalfredo mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT baumannmatthias mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT burtonjamie mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT caminomicaela mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT decarrejulieta mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT martellofelipe mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT regolinandreluis mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco AT kuemmerletobias mappingopportunitiesandbarriersforcoexistencebetweenpeopleandpumasintheargentinedrychaco |
_version_ |
1816149689402130432 |