Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession
The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type, and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chonosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e., crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1-95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and lab analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density, and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C:N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration, and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Life Science, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/soil-resistance-and-recovery-during-neotropical-forest-succession |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-598960 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5989602024-11-15 van der Sande, Masha T. Powers, Jennifer S. Kuyper, Thom W. Norden, Natalia Salgado-Negret, Beatriz Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene Bongers, F. Delgado, Diego Dent, Daisy H. Derroire, Géraldine do Espírito Santo, Mário Marcos Dupuy, Juan M. Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson Finegan, Bryan Gavito, Mayra E. Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis Jakovac, Catarina C. Jones, Isabel L. das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria Meave, Jorge A. Mora, Francisco Muñoz, Rodrigo Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia Piotto, Daniel Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban Caceres-Siani, Yasmani Dalban-Pilon, Coralie Dourdain, Aurélie Du, Dan V. García-Villalobos, Daniel Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo Poorter, L. Article/Letter to editor Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological sciences 378 (2023) 1867 ISSN: 0962-8436 Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession 2023 The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type, and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chonosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e., crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1-95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and lab analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density, and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C:N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration, and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/soil-resistance-and-recovery-during-neotropical-forest-succession 10.1098/rstb.2021.0074 https://edepot.wur.nl/572535 Life Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Life Science Life Science |
spellingShingle |
Life Science Life Science van der Sande, Masha T. Powers, Jennifer S. Kuyper, Thom W. Norden, Natalia Salgado-Negret, Beatriz Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene Bongers, F. Delgado, Diego Dent, Daisy H. Derroire, Géraldine do Espírito Santo, Mário Marcos Dupuy, Juan M. Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson Finegan, Bryan Gavito, Mayra E. Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis Jakovac, Catarina C. Jones, Isabel L. das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria Meave, Jorge A. Mora, Francisco Muñoz, Rodrigo Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia Piotto, Daniel Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban Caceres-Siani, Yasmani Dalban-Pilon, Coralie Dourdain, Aurélie Du, Dan V. García-Villalobos, Daniel Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo Poorter, L. Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
description |
The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type, and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chonosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e., crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1-95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and lab analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density, and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C:N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration, and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Life Science |
author |
van der Sande, Masha T. Powers, Jennifer S. Kuyper, Thom W. Norden, Natalia Salgado-Negret, Beatriz Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene Bongers, F. Delgado, Diego Dent, Daisy H. Derroire, Géraldine do Espírito Santo, Mário Marcos Dupuy, Juan M. Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson Finegan, Bryan Gavito, Mayra E. Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis Jakovac, Catarina C. Jones, Isabel L. das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria Meave, Jorge A. Mora, Francisco Muñoz, Rodrigo Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia Piotto, Daniel Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban Caceres-Siani, Yasmani Dalban-Pilon, Coralie Dourdain, Aurélie Du, Dan V. García-Villalobos, Daniel Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo Poorter, L. |
author_facet |
van der Sande, Masha T. Powers, Jennifer S. Kuyper, Thom W. Norden, Natalia Salgado-Negret, Beatriz Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene Bongers, F. Delgado, Diego Dent, Daisy H. Derroire, Géraldine do Espírito Santo, Mário Marcos Dupuy, Juan M. Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson Finegan, Bryan Gavito, Mayra E. Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis Jakovac, Catarina C. Jones, Isabel L. das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria Meave, Jorge A. Mora, Francisco Muñoz, Rodrigo Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia Piotto, Daniel Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban Caceres-Siani, Yasmani Dalban-Pilon, Coralie Dourdain, Aurélie Du, Dan V. García-Villalobos, Daniel Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo Poorter, L. |
author_sort |
van der Sande, Masha T. |
title |
Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
title_short |
Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
title_full |
Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
title_fullStr |
Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil resistance and recovery during Neotropical forest succession |
title_sort |
soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/soil-resistance-and-recovery-during-neotropical-forest-succession |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vandersandemashat soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT powersjennifers soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT kuyperthomw soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT nordennatalia soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT salgadonegretbeatriz soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT silvadealmeidajarcilene soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT bongersf soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT delgadodiego soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dentdaisyh soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT derroiregeraldine soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT doespiritosantomariomarcos soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dupuyjuanm soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT fernandesgeraldowilson soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT fineganbryan soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT gavitomayrae soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT hernandezstefanonijoseluis soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT jakovaccatarinac soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT jonesisabell soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dasdoresmagalhaesvelosomaria soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT meavejorgea soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT morafrancisco soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT munozrodrigo soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT perezcardenasnathalia soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT piottodaniel soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT alvarezdavilaesteban soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT caceressianiyasmani soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dalbanpiloncoralie soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dourdainaurelie soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT dudanv soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT garciavillalobosdaniel soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT nunesyulerobertaferreira soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT sanchezazofeifaarturo soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession AT poorterl soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession |
_version_ |
1816152208906911744 |