Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle
Direct measurements of methane (CH4) from individual animals are difficult and expensive. Predictions based on proxies for CH4 are a viable alternative. Most prediction models are based on multiple linear regressions (MLR) and predictor variables that are not routinely available in commercial farms, such as dry matter intake (DMI) and diet composition. The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict CH4 emissions from across-country heterogeneous data sets has not been reported. The objectives were to compare performances of ML ensemble algorithm random forest (RF) and MLR models in predicting CH4 emissions from proxies in dairy cows, and assess effects of imputing missing data points on prediction accuracy. Data on CH4 emissions and proxies for CH4 from 20 herds were provided by 10 countries. The integrated data set contained 43,519 records from 3,483 cows, with 18.7% missing data points imputed using k-nearest neighbor imputation. Three data sets were created, 3k (no missing records), 21k (missing DMI imputed from milk, fat, protein, body weight), and 41k (missing DMI, milk fat, and protein records imputed). These data sets were used to test scenarios (with or without DMI, imputed vs. nonimputed DMI, milk fat, and protein), and prediction models (RF vs. MLR). Model predictive ability was evaluated within and between herds through 10-fold cross-validation. Prediction accuracy was measured as correlation between observed and predicted CH4, root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG). Inclusion of DMI in the model improved within and between-herd prediction accuracy to 0.77 (RMSE = 23.3%) and 0.58 (RMSE = 31.9%) in RF and to 0.50 (RMSE = 0.327) and 0.13 (RMSE = 42.71) in MLR, respectively than when DMI was not included in the predictive model. When missing DMI records were imputed, within and between-herd accuracy increased to 0.84 (RMSE = 18.5%) and 0.63 (RMSE = 29.9%), respectively. In all scenarios, RF models out-performed MLR models. Results suggest routinely measured variables from dairy farms can be used in developing globally robust prediction models for CH4 if coupled with state-of-the-art techniques for imputation and advanced ML algorithms for predictive modeling.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | enteric methane, machine learning, prediction models, proxies for methane, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/integrating-heterogeneous-across-country-data-for-proxy-based-ran |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-596907 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5969072024-10-30 Negussie, Enyew González-Recio, Oscar Battagin, Mara Bayat, Ali Reza Boland, Tommy de Haas, Yvette Garcia-Rodriguez, Aser Garnsworthy, Philip C. Gengler, Nicolas Kreuzer, Michael Kuhla, Björn Lassen, Jan Peiren, Nico Pszczola, Marcin Schwarm, Angela Soyeurt, Hélène Vanlierde, Amélie Yan, Tianhai Biscarini, Filippo Article/Letter to editor Journal of Dairy Science 105 (2022) 6 ISSN: 0022-0302 Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle 2022 Direct measurements of methane (CH4) from individual animals are difficult and expensive. Predictions based on proxies for CH4 are a viable alternative. Most prediction models are based on multiple linear regressions (MLR) and predictor variables that are not routinely available in commercial farms, such as dry matter intake (DMI) and diet composition. The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict CH4 emissions from across-country heterogeneous data sets has not been reported. The objectives were to compare performances of ML ensemble algorithm random forest (RF) and MLR models in predicting CH4 emissions from proxies in dairy cows, and assess effects of imputing missing data points on prediction accuracy. Data on CH4 emissions and proxies for CH4 from 20 herds were provided by 10 countries. The integrated data set contained 43,519 records from 3,483 cows, with 18.7% missing data points imputed using k-nearest neighbor imputation. Three data sets were created, 3k (no missing records), 21k (missing DMI imputed from milk, fat, protein, body weight), and 41k (missing DMI, milk fat, and protein records imputed). These data sets were used to test scenarios (with or without DMI, imputed vs. nonimputed DMI, milk fat, and protein), and prediction models (RF vs. MLR). Model predictive ability was evaluated within and between herds through 10-fold cross-validation. Prediction accuracy was measured as correlation between observed and predicted CH4, root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG). Inclusion of DMI in the model improved within and between-herd prediction accuracy to 0.77 (RMSE = 23.3%) and 0.58 (RMSE = 31.9%) in RF and to 0.50 (RMSE = 0.327) and 0.13 (RMSE = 42.71) in MLR, respectively than when DMI was not included in the predictive model. When missing DMI records were imputed, within and between-herd accuracy increased to 0.84 (RMSE = 18.5%) and 0.63 (RMSE = 29.9%), respectively. In all scenarios, RF models out-performed MLR models. Results suggest routinely measured variables from dairy farms can be used in developing globally robust prediction models for CH4 if coupled with state-of-the-art techniques for imputation and advanced ML algorithms for predictive modeling. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/integrating-heterogeneous-across-country-data-for-proxy-based-ran 10.3168/jds.2021-20158 https://edepot.wur.nl/569198 enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane |
spellingShingle |
enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane Negussie, Enyew González-Recio, Oscar Battagin, Mara Bayat, Ali Reza Boland, Tommy de Haas, Yvette Garcia-Rodriguez, Aser Garnsworthy, Philip C. Gengler, Nicolas Kreuzer, Michael Kuhla, Björn Lassen, Jan Peiren, Nico Pszczola, Marcin Schwarm, Angela Soyeurt, Hélène Vanlierde, Amélie Yan, Tianhai Biscarini, Filippo Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
description |
Direct measurements of methane (CH4) from individual animals are difficult and expensive. Predictions based on proxies for CH4 are a viable alternative. Most prediction models are based on multiple linear regressions (MLR) and predictor variables that are not routinely available in commercial farms, such as dry matter intake (DMI) and diet composition. The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict CH4 emissions from across-country heterogeneous data sets has not been reported. The objectives were to compare performances of ML ensemble algorithm random forest (RF) and MLR models in predicting CH4 emissions from proxies in dairy cows, and assess effects of imputing missing data points on prediction accuracy. Data on CH4 emissions and proxies for CH4 from 20 herds were provided by 10 countries. The integrated data set contained 43,519 records from 3,483 cows, with 18.7% missing data points imputed using k-nearest neighbor imputation. Three data sets were created, 3k (no missing records), 21k (missing DMI imputed from milk, fat, protein, body weight), and 41k (missing DMI, milk fat, and protein records imputed). These data sets were used to test scenarios (with or without DMI, imputed vs. nonimputed DMI, milk fat, and protein), and prediction models (RF vs. MLR). Model predictive ability was evaluated within and between herds through 10-fold cross-validation. Prediction accuracy was measured as correlation between observed and predicted CH4, root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG). Inclusion of DMI in the model improved within and between-herd prediction accuracy to 0.77 (RMSE = 23.3%) and 0.58 (RMSE = 31.9%) in RF and to 0.50 (RMSE = 0.327) and 0.13 (RMSE = 42.71) in MLR, respectively than when DMI was not included in the predictive model. When missing DMI records were imputed, within and between-herd accuracy increased to 0.84 (RMSE = 18.5%) and 0.63 (RMSE = 29.9%), respectively. In all scenarios, RF models out-performed MLR models. Results suggest routinely measured variables from dairy farms can be used in developing globally robust prediction models for CH4 if coupled with state-of-the-art techniques for imputation and advanced ML algorithms for predictive modeling. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
enteric methane machine learning prediction models proxies for methane |
author |
Negussie, Enyew González-Recio, Oscar Battagin, Mara Bayat, Ali Reza Boland, Tommy de Haas, Yvette Garcia-Rodriguez, Aser Garnsworthy, Philip C. Gengler, Nicolas Kreuzer, Michael Kuhla, Björn Lassen, Jan Peiren, Nico Pszczola, Marcin Schwarm, Angela Soyeurt, Hélène Vanlierde, Amélie Yan, Tianhai Biscarini, Filippo |
author_facet |
Negussie, Enyew González-Recio, Oscar Battagin, Mara Bayat, Ali Reza Boland, Tommy de Haas, Yvette Garcia-Rodriguez, Aser Garnsworthy, Philip C. Gengler, Nicolas Kreuzer, Michael Kuhla, Björn Lassen, Jan Peiren, Nico Pszczola, Marcin Schwarm, Angela Soyeurt, Hélène Vanlierde, Amélie Yan, Tianhai Biscarini, Filippo |
author_sort |
Negussie, Enyew |
title |
Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
title_short |
Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
title_full |
Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
title_fullStr |
Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
title_sort |
integrating heterogeneous across-country data for proxy-based random forest prediction of enteric methane in dairy cattle |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/integrating-heterogeneous-across-country-data-for-proxy-based-ran |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT negussieenyew integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT gonzalezreciooscar integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT battaginmara integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT bayatalireza integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT bolandtommy integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT dehaasyvette integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT garciarodriguezaser integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT garnsworthyphilipc integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT genglernicolas integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT kreuzermichael integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT kuhlabjorn integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT lassenjan integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT peirennico integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT pszczolamarcin integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT schwarmangela integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT soyeurthelene integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT vanlierdeamelie integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT yantianhai integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle AT biscarinifilippo integratingheterogeneousacrosscountrydataforproxybasedrandomforestpredictionofentericmethaneindairycattle |
_version_ |
1816153121199489024 |