Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile

In the past decade, there has been growing concern about the rapid degradation of marine ecosystems due to anthropogenic causes. Consequently, identifying priority areas for the conservation of marine biodiversity has become a crucial conservation issue. Taking into account the influence of human population density, we performed complementarity analyses to identify priority areas for the conservation of all coastal marine vertebrate species in Chile (265 species), and evaluated congruence among the different target groups. The distribution ranges of all species were digitized in a geographic information system and analyses were performed on latitudinal bands of 0.5. Our results show that 12 latitudinal bands (similar to 16% of all latitudinal bands) are necessary to conserve at least one population of each species. Ten of these bands are irreplaceable, whereas two are flexible. Many of the irreplaceable sites lie within areas that have high human population density. In order to conserve all threatened and endemic species, six and three latitudinal bands are needed, respectively. Four latitudinal bands are needed to represent all species of fish, reptiles, and mammals, whereas nine bands are needed to protect all bird species. Taking flexible sites into account, reserve networks that meet the minimum representation goal for each taxonomic group, and for threatened and endemic species, represent subsets of the 12 latitudinal band network selected for all species. Spatial congruence among reserve networks selected for each target group was relatively low and only significantly higher than random in 9 out of 2.1 pairwise comparisons. However, with the exception of reptiles, conservation areas selected for different surrogate groups represented other groups relatively well, compared to randomly selected sites.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tognelli, Marcelo F., Silva García, Celeste, Labra, Fabio A., Marquet, Pablo A.
Format: Artículo de revista biblioteca
Language:English
Published: ELSEVIER 2005-12
Subjects:CAPE FLORISTIC REGION,
Online Access:https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119993
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-uchile-cl-2250-119993
record_format koha
spelling dig-uchile-cl-2250-1199932023-03-01T21:52:33Z Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile Tognelli, Marcelo F. Silva García, Celeste Labra, Fabio A. Marquet, Pablo A. CAPE FLORISTIC REGION In the past decade, there has been growing concern about the rapid degradation of marine ecosystems due to anthropogenic causes. Consequently, identifying priority areas for the conservation of marine biodiversity has become a crucial conservation issue. Taking into account the influence of human population density, we performed complementarity analyses to identify priority areas for the conservation of all coastal marine vertebrate species in Chile (265 species), and evaluated congruence among the different target groups. The distribution ranges of all species were digitized in a geographic information system and analyses were performed on latitudinal bands of 0.5. Our results show that 12 latitudinal bands (similar to 16% of all latitudinal bands) are necessary to conserve at least one population of each species. Ten of these bands are irreplaceable, whereas two are flexible. Many of the irreplaceable sites lie within areas that have high human population density. In order to conserve all threatened and endemic species, six and three latitudinal bands are needed, respectively. Four latitudinal bands are needed to represent all species of fish, reptiles, and mammals, whereas nine bands are needed to protect all bird species. Taking flexible sites into account, reserve networks that meet the minimum representation goal for each taxonomic group, and for threatened and endemic species, represent subsets of the 12 latitudinal band network selected for all species. Spatial congruence among reserve networks selected for each target group was relatively low and only significantly higher than random in 9 out of 2.1 pairwise comparisons. However, with the exception of reptiles, conservation areas selected for different surrogate groups represented other groups relatively well, compared to randomly selected sites. 2008-03-18T15:07:51Z 2008-03-18T15:07:51Z 2005-12 Artículo de revista BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION Volume: 126 Issue: 3 Pages: 420-428 Published: DEC 2005 0006-3207 https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119993 en application/pdf ELSEVIER
institution UCHILE CL
collection DSpace
country Chile
countrycode CL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-uchile-cl
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas de la UCHILE
language English
topic CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
spellingShingle CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
Tognelli, Marcelo F.
Silva García, Celeste
Labra, Fabio A.
Marquet, Pablo A.
Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
description In the past decade, there has been growing concern about the rapid degradation of marine ecosystems due to anthropogenic causes. Consequently, identifying priority areas for the conservation of marine biodiversity has become a crucial conservation issue. Taking into account the influence of human population density, we performed complementarity analyses to identify priority areas for the conservation of all coastal marine vertebrate species in Chile (265 species), and evaluated congruence among the different target groups. The distribution ranges of all species were digitized in a geographic information system and analyses were performed on latitudinal bands of 0.5. Our results show that 12 latitudinal bands (similar to 16% of all latitudinal bands) are necessary to conserve at least one population of each species. Ten of these bands are irreplaceable, whereas two are flexible. Many of the irreplaceable sites lie within areas that have high human population density. In order to conserve all threatened and endemic species, six and three latitudinal bands are needed, respectively. Four latitudinal bands are needed to represent all species of fish, reptiles, and mammals, whereas nine bands are needed to protect all bird species. Taking flexible sites into account, reserve networks that meet the minimum representation goal for each taxonomic group, and for threatened and endemic species, represent subsets of the 12 latitudinal band network selected for all species. Spatial congruence among reserve networks selected for each target group was relatively low and only significantly higher than random in 9 out of 2.1 pairwise comparisons. However, with the exception of reptiles, conservation areas selected for different surrogate groups represented other groups relatively well, compared to randomly selected sites.
format Artículo de revista
topic_facet CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
author Tognelli, Marcelo F.
Silva García, Celeste
Labra, Fabio A.
Marquet, Pablo A.
author_facet Tognelli, Marcelo F.
Silva García, Celeste
Labra, Fabio A.
Marquet, Pablo A.
author_sort Tognelli, Marcelo F.
title Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
title_short Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
title_full Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
title_fullStr Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in Chile
title_sort priority areas for the conservation of coastal marine vertebrates in chile
publisher ELSEVIER
publishDate 2005-12
url https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/119993
work_keys_str_mv AT tognellimarcelof priorityareasfortheconservationofcoastalmarinevertebratesinchile
AT silvagarciaceleste priorityareasfortheconservationofcoastalmarinevertebratesinchile
AT labrafabioa priorityareasfortheconservationofcoastalmarinevertebratesinchile
AT marquetpabloa priorityareasfortheconservationofcoastalmarinevertebratesinchile
_version_ 1767076390714212352