Noncomparable Poverty Comparisons
Poverty estimates based on enumeration from a single point in time form the basis for most country-level analysis of poverty. Cross-country comparisons of poverty, and global counts of the poor, implicitly assume that country-level poverty headcounts are comparable. This paper illustrates that the assumption of comparability is potentially invalid when households are interviewed multiple times throughout the year, as opposed to a single-visit interview. An example from Jordan illustrates how the internationally comparable approach of handling data from repeat visits yields a poverty rate that is 26 per cent greater than the rate that is currently reported as the official estimate.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2017-01-23
|
| Subjects: | POVERTY MEASUREMENT, SEASONALITY, REPEAT OBSERVATIONS, GLOBAL POVERTY, POVERTY RATE, |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29430 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|