Global Trade and Food Safety : Winners and Losers in a Fragmented System

Food safety standards, and the tradeoff between these standards, and agricultural export growth, are at the forefront of the trade policy debate. How food safety is addressed in the world trade system, is critical for developing countries that continue to rely on agricultural exports. In a fragmented system of conflicting national food safety standards, and no globally accepted standards, export prospects for the least developed countries, can be severely limited. The authors examine the impact that adopting international food safety standards, and harmonizing standards would have on global food trade patterns. They estimate the effect of aflatoxin standards in fifteen importing countries (including four developing countries) on exports from thirty one countries (twenty one of them developing). Aflatoxin is a natural substance that can contaminate certain nuts, and grains when storage, and drying facilities are inadequate. The analysis shows that adopting a worldwide standard for aflatoxin B1 (potentially the most toxic of aflatoxins) based on current international guidelines, would increase nut, and cereal trade among the countries studied, by $ 6.1 billion, compared with 1998 levels. This harmonization of standards would increase world exports by $ 38.8 billion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilson, John S., Otsuki, Tsunehiro
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-10
Subjects:FOOD SAFETY, FOOD SECURITY, AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS, TRADE POLICY, STANDARDIZATION, LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, TRADE PROMOTION, AFLATOXINS, CONTAMINANTS, CEREAL PRODUCTS, NUT INDUSTRY, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES, AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, AGRICULTURAL TRADE, AGRICULTURE, BEEF, BENCHMARK, BILATERAL TRADE, CANCER, CARCINOGENS, CEREALS, CHANGES IN TRADE, CONSUMERS, CORN, DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, DRIED FRUIT, DRIED FRUITS, ECONOMETRIC MODELS, ECONOMIC RESEARCH, ECONOMICS, ECONOMISTS, EDIBLE NUTS, ELASTICITY, EXPORT GROWTH, EXPORT MARKETS, EXPORT PROSPECTS, EXPORTERS, EXPORTS, FISH, FOOD ADDITIVES, FOOD GRAINS, FOOD HANDLING, FOOD MARKETING, FOOD POLICY, FOOD PROCESSING, FOOD PRODUCTS, FOODS, FOREIGN PRODUCERS, FREE TRADE, FREE TRADE AREA, FRUITS, GLOBAL TRADE, GNP, GNP PER CAPITA, GRAVITY MODEL, GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT, GROUNDNUT, GROUNDNUTS, HAZARDS, IMPERFECT INFORMATION, IMPORTS, INCOME, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, MARGINAL BENEFITS, MARGINAL COSTS, MARKET FAILURES, MORTALITY, MUTUAL TRADE, NUT PRODUCTS, NUTS, PECANS, POLICY RESEARCH, PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT, PRODUCERS, PUBLIC HEALTH, REGIONAL TRADE, REGIONALISM, REGULATORY BARRIERS, RICE, SAFETY REGULATIONS, SAFETY STANDARDS, SCALE EFFECT, TAXATION, TOXIC SUBSTANCES, TRADE BARRIERS, TRADE DATA, TRADE DISPUTES, TRADE EFFECT, TRADE FLOW DATA, TRADE FLOWS, TRADE PATTERNS, TRADE PERFORMANCE, TRADE VOLUMES, TRANSACTION COSTS, URUGUAY ROUND, VALUE OF EXPORTS, VALUE OF TRADE, VEGETABLES, WALNUTS, WELFARE EFFECTS, WORLD TRADE, WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION, WTO, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS, AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/1615017/global-trade-food-safety-winners-losers-fragmented-system
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19529
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!