Buying Votes vs. Supplying Public Services : Political Incentives to Under-invest in Pro-poor Policies

This paper uses unique survey data to provide, for the first time in the literature, direct evidence that vote buying in poor economies is associated with lower provision of public services that disproportionately benefit the poor. Various features of the data and the institutional context allow the interpretation of this correlation as the equilibrium policy consequence of clientelist politics, ruling out alternate explanations (such as, for example, poverty driving both vote buying and health outcomes). The data come from the Philippines, a country context that allows for measuring vote buying during elections and services delivered by the administrative unit controlled by winners of those elections. The data reveal a significant, robust negative correlation between vote buying and the delivery of primary health services. In places where households report more vote buying, government records show that municipalities invest less in basic health services for mothers and children; and, quite strikingly, as a summary measure of weak service delivery performance, a higher percentage of children are severely under-weight.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khemani, Stuti
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2013-01
Subjects:ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES, ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTING, ANTENATAL CARE, ASSETS, BASIC HEALTH SERVICES, BASIC SERVICES, BLOCK GRANTS, BRIBERY, CHILD HEALTH, CHILD HEALTH SERVICES, CIVIL SOCIETY, CLINICS, COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITY HEALTH, CONFIDENCE, CORRUPT, CORRUPTION, DECENTRALIZATION, DEMOCRACIES, DEMOCRACY, DESCRIPTION, DISTRICTS, DOCTORS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC POLICY, EMPLOYMENT, EQUILIBRIUM, EXPENDITURES, FAMILIES, FEMALE, FISCAL CAPACITY, FOLIC ACID, GOOD GOVERNANCE, HEALTH CENTERS, HEALTH FOR ALL, HEALTH INVESTMENTS, HEALTH OUTCOMES, HEALTH POLICIES, HEALTH POLICY, HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, HEALTH PROGRAMS, HEALTH PROJECTS, HEALTH PROVIDERS, HEALTH RECORDS, HEALTH SECTOR, HEALTH SERVICE, HEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY, HEALTH SERVICES, HOSPITALS, HOUSEHOLDS, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, HUNGER, IMMUNIZATION, INCOME, INFANT HEALTH, INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS, INTERVENTIONS, IRON, LAW ENFORCEMENT, LEASING, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MEDIA, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, MEDICINES, MONOPOLY, MUNICIPAL, MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS, MUNICIPALITIES, NEPOTISM, NURSES, NUTRITION, NUTRITIONAL STATUS, PATRONAGE, POLITICIAN, POLITICIANS, PREGNANCY, PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, PROBABILITY, PROCUREMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH PERSONNEL, PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES, PUBLIC HEALTH SPENDING, PUBLIC POLICIES, PUBLIC SERVICES, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REMEDY, RENTS, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, RULE OF LAW, SCANDALS, SERVICE DELIVERY, SETTLEMENTS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, SOCIAL SERVICES, STERILIZATION, TAXATION, THEFT, TRANSPARENCY, USER CHARGES, VILLAGE HEALTH WORKERS, VILLAGE LEVEL, VILLAGES, VIOLENCE, WORKERS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/01/17200957/buying-votes-vs-supplying-public-services-political-incentives-under-invest-pro-poor-policies
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/13126
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!