Controlling Market Power : Balancing Antitrust and Sector Regulation in Telecoms
Among the countries fully liberalizing
their telecommunicationssector, some have chosen
to rely mainly on sector-specific rules,often
applied by sector-specific institutions, while others
havedepended on economywide antitrust rules and
institutions to controlmarket power. This Note
describes the choices made by five
notablereformers: Australia, Chile, New Zealand,
the United Kingdom, and theUnited States. Drawing
on their experiences, it then assesses
whetherantitrust or sector-specific processes have
dealt more quickly andeffectively with key
regulatory issues.
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
| Main Authors: |
Kerf, Michel,
Neto, Isabel,
Geradim, Damien |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2005-06
|
|---|
| Subjects: | ANTITRUST,
ANTITRUST AUTHORITIES,
ANTITRUST AUTHORITY,
ANTITRUST LAW,
ANTITRUST LEGISLATION,
ANTITRUST REGULATION,
AUTHORIZATION,
COMPETITION LAW,
ECONOMIC REGULATION,
INNOVATIONS,
JUDGES,
LEGISLATURE,
LICENSES,
MARKET CONDITIONS,
MARKET POWER,
MARKET SEGMENTS,
MONOPOLIES,
PHONES,
PRESIDENCY,
PRICE REGULATION,
PRIVATE SECTOR,
PROVISIONS,
PUBLIC POLICY,
PUBLIC RESOURCES,
PUBLIC SUBSIDIES,
REGULATOR,
REGULATORS,
REGULATORY AGENCY,
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS,
REGULATORY INTERVENTION,
REGULATORY REGIMES,
RETAIL,
RETAIL PRICES,
SPREAD,
TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATOR,
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES,
TELECOMS,
UNBUNDLING,
UNIVERSAL SERVICE,
UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBJECTIVES, |
|---|
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/6040141/controlling-market-power-balancing-antitrust-sector-regulation-telecoms
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11216
|
|---|
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
|---|
