Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | article biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie, L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales, méthodologie, résistance aux antimicrobiens, contrôle continu, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736, |
Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cirad-fr-608614 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-6086142024-02-29T13:53:06Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance. Alban Lis, Bordier Marion, Häsler Barbara, Collineau Lucie, Tomassone Laura, Bennani Houda, Aenishaenslin Cécile, Norström Madelaine, Aragrande Maurizio, Filippitzi Maria-Eleni, Moura Pedro, Sandberg Marianne. 2023. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10:1107122, 8 p.https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 <https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122> Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance Alban, Lis Bordier, Marion Häsler, Barbara Collineau, Lucie Tomassone, Laura Bennani, Houda Aenishaenslin, Cécile Norström, Madelaine Aragrande, Maurizio Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Moura, Pedro Sandberg, Marianne eng 2023 Frontiers in Veterinary Science L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 |
spellingShingle |
L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 Alban, Lis Bordier, Marion Häsler, Barbara Collineau, Lucie Tomassone, Laura Bennani, Houda Aenishaenslin, Cécile Norström, Madelaine Aragrande, Maurizio Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Moura, Pedro Sandberg, Marianne Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
description |
Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 |
author |
Alban, Lis Bordier, Marion Häsler, Barbara Collineau, Lucie Tomassone, Laura Bennani, Houda Aenishaenslin, Cécile Norström, Madelaine Aragrande, Maurizio Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Moura, Pedro Sandberg, Marianne |
author_facet |
Alban, Lis Bordier, Marion Häsler, Barbara Collineau, Lucie Tomassone, Laura Bennani, Houda Aenishaenslin, Cécile Norström, Madelaine Aragrande, Maurizio Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Moura, Pedro Sandberg, Marianne |
author_sort |
Alban, Lis |
title |
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
title_short |
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
title_full |
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
title_fullStr |
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance |
title_sort |
capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated amu and amr surveillance |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albanlis capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT bordiermarion capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT haslerbarbara capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT collineaulucie capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT tomassonelaura capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT bennanihouda capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT aenishaenslincecile capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT norstrommadelaine capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT aragrandemaurizio capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT filippitzimariaeleni capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT mourapedro capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance AT sandbergmarianne capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance |
_version_ |
1792500804630872064 |