Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance

Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alban, Lis, Bordier, Marion, Häsler, Barbara, Collineau, Lucie, Tomassone, Laura, Bennani, Houda, Aenishaenslin, Cécile, Norström, Madelaine, Aragrande, Maurizio, Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni, Moura, Pedro, Sandberg, Marianne
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie, L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales, méthodologie, résistance aux antimicrobiens, contrôle continu, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-608614
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6086142024-02-29T13:53:06Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/ Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance. Alban Lis, Bordier Marion, Häsler Barbara, Collineau Lucie, Tomassone Laura, Bennani Houda, Aenishaenslin Cécile, Norström Madelaine, Aragrande Maurizio, Filippitzi Maria-Eleni, Moura Pedro, Sandberg Marianne. 2023. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10:1107122, 8 p.https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 <https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122> Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance Alban, Lis Bordier, Marion Häsler, Barbara Collineau, Lucie Tomassone, Laura Bennani, Houda Aenishaenslin, Cécile Norström, Madelaine Aragrande, Maurizio Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Moura, Pedro Sandberg, Marianne eng 2023 Frontiers in Veterinary Science L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales méthodologie résistance aux antimicrobiens contrôle continu http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736 Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1107122
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie
L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales
méthodologie
résistance aux antimicrobiens
contrôle continu
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie
L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales
méthodologie
résistance aux antimicrobiens
contrôle continu
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
spellingShingle L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie
L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales
méthodologie
résistance aux antimicrobiens
contrôle continu
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie
L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales
méthodologie
résistance aux antimicrobiens
contrôle continu
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
Alban, Lis
Bordier, Marion
Häsler, Barbara
Collineau, Lucie
Tomassone, Laura
Bennani, Houda
Aenishaenslin, Cécile
Norström, Madelaine
Aragrande, Maurizio
Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni
Moura, Pedro
Sandberg, Marianne
Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
description Tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a goal for many countries. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) and resistance is a prerequisite for effective risk mitigation. Regular evaluation of any surveillance is needed to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. The question is how to evaluate specifically integrated surveillance for AMU and AMR. In an international network called CoEvalAMR, we have developed guidelines for selection of the most appropriate tools for such an evaluation. Moreover, we have assessed different evaluation tools as examples using a country case format and a methodology with a focus on the user's experience. This paper describes the updated methodology, which consists of a brief introduction to the case and to the tool separately. Moreover, there are 12 functional aspects and nine content themes which should be scored using a 4-tiered scale. Additionally, four Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) questions should be addressed. Results are illustrated using radar diagrams. An example of application of the updated methodology is given using the ECoSur evaluation tool. No tool can cover all evaluation aspects comprehensively in a user-friendly manner, so the choice of tool must be based upon the specific evaluation purpose. Moreover, adequate resources, time and training are needed to obtain useful outputs from the evaluation. Our updated methodology can be used by tool users to share their experience with available tools, and hereby assist other users in identifying the most suited tool for their evaluation purpose. Additionally, tool developers can get valuable information for further improvements of their tool.
format article
topic_facet L75 - Pharmacologie et toxicologie
L70 - Sciences et hygiène vétérinaires - Considérations générales
méthodologie
résistance aux antimicrobiens
contrôle continu
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_12522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_662faf6f
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2736
author Alban, Lis
Bordier, Marion
Häsler, Barbara
Collineau, Lucie
Tomassone, Laura
Bennani, Houda
Aenishaenslin, Cécile
Norström, Madelaine
Aragrande, Maurizio
Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni
Moura, Pedro
Sandberg, Marianne
author_facet Alban, Lis
Bordier, Marion
Häsler, Barbara
Collineau, Lucie
Tomassone, Laura
Bennani, Houda
Aenishaenslin, Cécile
Norström, Madelaine
Aragrande, Maurizio
Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni
Moura, Pedro
Sandberg, Marianne
author_sort Alban, Lis
title Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
title_short Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
title_full Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
title_fullStr Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated AMU and AMR surveillance
title_sort capturing systematically users' experience of evaluation tools for integrated amu and amr surveillance
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/608614/1/608614.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT albanlis capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT bordiermarion capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT haslerbarbara capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT collineaulucie capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT tomassonelaura capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT bennanihouda capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT aenishaenslincecile capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT norstrommadelaine capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT aragrandemaurizio capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT filippitzimariaeleni capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT mourapedro capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
AT sandbergmarianne capturingsystematicallyusersexperienceofevaluationtoolsforintegratedamuandamrsurveillance
_version_ 1792500804630872064