Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance

Power asymmetries affect the governance of natural resources but are rarely considered explicitly in ecosystem services research, which often overlooks the diversity of actors and their interactions. In this paper, we propose an innovative and easily replicable method to analyze two types of power asymmetries, using social network analysis and a power typology which distinguishes between influence and domination. We apply this method to a network of actors involved in the governance of eight ecosystem services in the Peruvian Andes. The results reveal substantial power asymmetries, of different types. Indirect managers of ecosystem services had higher influence and domination than the direct managers and beneficiaries. Businesses showed significantly lower influence than members of civil society, non-governmental organizations, and the public sector (state or decentralized organizations, public enterprises). Compared to other actors, members of the public sector had significantly higher domination, especially national actors. Domination and influence relationships strongly increased conflict probability, along with difference of domination score between two actors. A better interdisciplinary understanding of the determinants of power asymmetries can make the governance of socio-ecological systems more sustainable.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vallet, Ameline, Locatelli, Bruno, Barnaud, Cécile, Makowski, David, Quispe Condé, Yésica, Levrel, Harold
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E50 - Sociologie rurale, services écosystémiques, gouvernance, gestion des ressources naturelles, environnement socioéconomique, réseaux sociaux, groupe d'influence, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/1/Vallet%202020%20Power%20asymmetries%20in%20social%20networks%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20governance.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-596506
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5965062024-08-20T11:38:49Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/ Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance. Vallet Ameline, Locatelli Bruno, Barnaud Cécile, Makowski David, Quispe Condé Yésica, Levrel Harold. 2020. Environmental Science and Policy, 114 : 329-340.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020> Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance Vallet, Ameline Locatelli, Bruno Barnaud, Cécile Makowski, David Quispe Condé, Yésica Levrel, Harold eng 2020 Environmental Science and Policy P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E50 - Sociologie rurale services écosystémiques gouvernance gestion des ressources naturelles environnement socioéconomique réseaux sociaux groupe d'influence http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660 Pérou http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725 Power asymmetries affect the governance of natural resources but are rarely considered explicitly in ecosystem services research, which often overlooks the diversity of actors and their interactions. In this paper, we propose an innovative and easily replicable method to analyze two types of power asymmetries, using social network analysis and a power typology which distinguishes between influence and domination. We apply this method to a network of actors involved in the governance of eight ecosystem services in the Peruvian Andes. The results reveal substantial power asymmetries, of different types. Indirect managers of ecosystem services had higher influence and domination than the direct managers and beneficiaries. Businesses showed significantly lower influence than members of civil society, non-governmental organizations, and the public sector (state or decentralized organizations, public enterprises). Compared to other actors, members of the public sector had significantly higher domination, especially national actors. Domination and influence relationships strongly increased conflict probability, along with difference of domination score between two actors. A better interdisciplinary understanding of the determinants of power asymmetries can make the governance of socio-ecological systems more sustainable. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/1/Vallet%202020%20Power%20asymmetries%20in%20social%20networks%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20governance.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.020 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/ANR-17-CE32-0012//(FRA) Trajectoires des Socio-Ecosystèmes dans les Bassins Versants d'Amérique Latine: Face à la Complexité et la Vulnérabilité dans le contexte du Changement Climatique/TRASSE info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/776609//(EU) Strengthening INternational Cooperation on climatE change Research/SINCERE
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
services écosystémiques
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
environnement socioéconomique
réseaux sociaux
groupe d'influence
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
services écosystémiques
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
environnement socioéconomique
réseaux sociaux
groupe d'influence
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725
spellingShingle P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
services écosystémiques
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
environnement socioéconomique
réseaux sociaux
groupe d'influence
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
services écosystémiques
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
environnement socioéconomique
réseaux sociaux
groupe d'influence
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725
Vallet, Ameline
Locatelli, Bruno
Barnaud, Cécile
Makowski, David
Quispe Condé, Yésica
Levrel, Harold
Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
description Power asymmetries affect the governance of natural resources but are rarely considered explicitly in ecosystem services research, which often overlooks the diversity of actors and their interactions. In this paper, we propose an innovative and easily replicable method to analyze two types of power asymmetries, using social network analysis and a power typology which distinguishes between influence and domination. We apply this method to a network of actors involved in the governance of eight ecosystem services in the Peruvian Andes. The results reveal substantial power asymmetries, of different types. Indirect managers of ecosystem services had higher influence and domination than the direct managers and beneficiaries. Businesses showed significantly lower influence than members of civil society, non-governmental organizations, and the public sector (state or decentralized organizations, public enterprises). Compared to other actors, members of the public sector had significantly higher domination, especially national actors. Domination and influence relationships strongly increased conflict probability, along with difference of domination score between two actors. A better interdisciplinary understanding of the determinants of power asymmetries can make the governance of socio-ecological systems more sustainable.
format article
topic_facet P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale
services écosystémiques
gouvernance
gestion des ressources naturelles
environnement socioéconomique
réseaux sociaux
groupe d'influence
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26824
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1411027600660
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5725
author Vallet, Ameline
Locatelli, Bruno
Barnaud, Cécile
Makowski, David
Quispe Condé, Yésica
Levrel, Harold
author_facet Vallet, Ameline
Locatelli, Bruno
Barnaud, Cécile
Makowski, David
Quispe Condé, Yésica
Levrel, Harold
author_sort Vallet, Ameline
title Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
title_short Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
title_full Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
title_fullStr Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
title_full_unstemmed Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
title_sort power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/1/Vallet%202020%20Power%20asymmetries%20in%20social%20networks%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20governance.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT valletameline powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
AT locatellibruno powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
AT barnaudcecile powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
AT makowskidavid powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
AT quispecondeyesica powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
AT levrelharold powerasymmetriesinsocialnetworksofecosystemservicesgovernance
_version_ 1809110749488873472