Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES

Regime complexes are arrays of institutions with partially overlapping mandates and memberships. As tensions frequently arise among these institutions, there is a growing interest geared to finding strategies to reduce them. Insights from regime theory, science and technology studies, and social network analysis support the claim that "boundary organizations"—a type of organization until now overlooked in International Relations—can reduce tensions within regime complexes by generating credible, legitimate, and salient knowledge, provided that their internal networks balance multiple knowledge dimensions. Building on this argument, this article offers an ex ante assessment of the recently created International Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Results from our network analysis of IPBES point to clear improvements compared with similar organizations, although major deficiencies remain. The contribution of this article is threefold. Methodologically, it introduces new conceptual and technical tools to assess the '"social representativeness" of international organizations. Theoretically, it supports the claim that international organizations are penetrated by transnational networks and, consequently, that the proliferation of institutions tends to reproduce structural imbalances. Normatively, it argues that a revision of nomination processes could improve the ability of boundary organizations to generate salient, credible, and legitimate knowledge.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Louafi, Selim, Orsini, Amandine, Oubenal, Mohamed
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E14 - Économie et politique du développement, services écosystémiques, biodiversité, réseaux sociaux, organisation internationale, institution sociale, analyse de réseau, politique de l'environnement, gestion des ressources naturelles, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/13/581249.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-581249
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5812492024-01-29T05:35:51Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/ Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES. Morin Jean-Frédéric, Louafi Selim, Orsini Amandine, Oubenal Mohamed. 2017. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20 (3) : 543-577.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8 <https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8> Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES Morin, Jean-Frédéric Louafi, Selim Orsini, Amandine Oubenal, Mohamed eng 2017 Journal of International Relations and Development P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E14 - Économie et politique du développement services écosystémiques biodiversité réseaux sociaux organisation internationale institution sociale analyse de réseau politique de l'environnement gestion des ressources naturelles http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 Regime complexes are arrays of institutions with partially overlapping mandates and memberships. As tensions frequently arise among these institutions, there is a growing interest geared to finding strategies to reduce them. Insights from regime theory, science and technology studies, and social network analysis support the claim that "boundary organizations"—a type of organization until now overlooked in International Relations—can reduce tensions within regime complexes by generating credible, legitimate, and salient knowledge, provided that their internal networks balance multiple knowledge dimensions. Building on this argument, this article offers an ex ante assessment of the recently created International Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Results from our network analysis of IPBES point to clear improvements compared with similar organizations, although major deficiencies remain. The contribution of this article is threefold. Methodologically, it introduces new conceptual and technical tools to assess the '"social representativeness" of international organizations. Theoretically, it supports the claim that international organizations are penetrated by transnational networks and, consequently, that the proliferation of institutions tends to reproduce structural imbalances. Normatively, it argues that a revision of nomination processes could improve the ability of boundary organizations to generate salient, credible, and legitimate knowledge. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/13/581249.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8 10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0006-8
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
services écosystémiques
biodiversité
réseaux sociaux
organisation internationale
institution sociale
analyse de réseau
politique de l'environnement
gestion des ressources naturelles
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
services écosystémiques
biodiversité
réseaux sociaux
organisation internationale
institution sociale
analyse de réseau
politique de l'environnement
gestion des ressources naturelles
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
spellingShingle P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
services écosystémiques
biodiversité
réseaux sociaux
organisation internationale
institution sociale
analyse de réseau
politique de l'environnement
gestion des ressources naturelles
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
services écosystémiques
biodiversité
réseaux sociaux
organisation internationale
institution sociale
analyse de réseau
politique de l'environnement
gestion des ressources naturelles
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
Morin, Jean-Frédéric
Louafi, Selim
Orsini, Amandine
Oubenal, Mohamed
Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
description Regime complexes are arrays of institutions with partially overlapping mandates and memberships. As tensions frequently arise among these institutions, there is a growing interest geared to finding strategies to reduce them. Insights from regime theory, science and technology studies, and social network analysis support the claim that "boundary organizations"—a type of organization until now overlooked in International Relations—can reduce tensions within regime complexes by generating credible, legitimate, and salient knowledge, provided that their internal networks balance multiple knowledge dimensions. Building on this argument, this article offers an ex ante assessment of the recently created International Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Results from our network analysis of IPBES point to clear improvements compared with similar organizations, although major deficiencies remain. The contribution of this article is threefold. Methodologically, it introduces new conceptual and technical tools to assess the '"social representativeness" of international organizations. Theoretically, it supports the claim that international organizations are penetrated by transnational networks and, consequently, that the proliferation of institutions tends to reproduce structural imbalances. Normatively, it argues that a revision of nomination processes could improve the ability of boundary organizations to generate salient, credible, and legitimate knowledge.
format article
topic_facet P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
services écosystémiques
biodiversité
réseaux sociaux
organisation internationale
institution sociale
analyse de réseau
politique de l'environnement
gestion des ressources naturelles
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e64c9a8d
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3918
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15522
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5144
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
author Morin, Jean-Frédéric
Louafi, Selim
Orsini, Amandine
Oubenal, Mohamed
author_facet Morin, Jean-Frédéric
Louafi, Selim
Orsini, Amandine
Oubenal, Mohamed
author_sort Morin, Jean-Frédéric
title Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
title_short Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
title_full Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
title_fullStr Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
title_full_unstemmed Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES
title_sort boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of ipbes
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/581249/13/581249.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT morinjeanfrederic boundaryorganizationsinregimecomplexesasocialnetworkprofileofipbes
AT louafiselim boundaryorganizationsinregimecomplexesasocialnetworkprofileofipbes
AT orsiniamandine boundaryorganizationsinregimecomplexesasocialnetworkprofileofipbes
AT oubenalmohamed boundaryorganizationsinregimecomplexesasocialnetworkprofileofipbes
_version_ 1792499092812726272