Diversity of gastrointestinal Helminths in murid rodents from Northern and Northeastern Thailand

The presence of gastrointestinal helminths (GI helminths) was investigated among 725 murid rodents, trapped in various habitats of Nan, Loei and Buri Ram Provinces, Thailand. The study revealed 17 species of rodents infected with 21 species or taxonomic groups of parasites (3 trematodes, 3 cestodes, 14 nematodes and 1 acanthocephalan). The overall prevalence of infection was 57.7% (418/725). Of the gastrointestinal (GI) helminths, the dominant parasitic group was members of the family Trichostrongylidae (24.3%), followed by the cestodes Raillietina sp (17.1%) and Hymenolepis diminuta (8.6%) and the nematode Syphacia muris (8.6%). The GI helminthic infection rates were highest in Mus caroli (81.8%), Mus cervicolor (76.5%), Leopoldamys edwardsi (75.0%), Bandicota indica (71.5%) and Bandicota savilei (71.4%). Highest rodent species richness (RSR) and helminth species richness (HSR) rates were found in Loei, followed by Nan and Buri Ram. The helminth prevalence rate was higher in rodents from Nan, followed by rodents from Loei and Buri Ram. Rodents from irrigated fields had the highest infection rates followed by rodents from upland or dry agricultural areas, forests and domestic habitats. Raillietina sp, Rodentolepis nana (syn. Hymenolepis nana), Hymenol-epis diminuta, Moniliformis moniliformis and Cyclodontostomum purvisi, considered zoonotic parasites, were mainly found in rodents from domestic habitats and lowland irrigated fields.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaisiri, Kittipong, Chaeychomsri, Win, Siruntawineti, Jindawan, Ribas, Alexis, Herbreteau, Vincent, Morand, Serge
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:L72 - Organismes nuisibles des animaux, L73 - Maladies des animaux, Helminthe, helminthiase, identification, taxonomie, rongeur, habitat, Trichostrongylidae, Cestoda, Raillietina, Hymenolepis diminuta, Nematoda, Syphacia, appareil digestif, surveillance, parasitose, zone humide, culture irriguée, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3549, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3547, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3791, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7631, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13948, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3456, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_31137, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1481, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6433, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_31957, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5112, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_31102, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2275, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4911, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5579, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3688, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3952, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7701,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/564362/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/564362/1/document_564362.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!