Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards

Designing intercrop management plans (IMP) to meet objectives related to both crop production and environmental impacts is a challenge for farmers. A multiple criteria decision analysis is thus needed to evaluate and rate various cropping systems in different soil and climate conditions. Different intercrop management plans in vineyards were analysed in this study so as to classify them in relation to their ability to fulfil a particular set of objectives and to deal with climatic variability. The method included five steps. A set of intercrop management plans was defined by combining the type of grass, the covered soil surface ratio, and the intercropping duration. Four evaluation criteria were chosen: grapevine vegetative development, yield, product quality and runoff. Corresponding indicators were identified and the range of values that would be desirable or not were defined. A water balance model designed for row crops was run to simulate the behaviour of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system under different management plans and at various soil depths. The model was used to calculate, for each management plan and soil depth, the four indicators and evaluate the overall agreement and discordance with various weights assigned to the four criteria. A frequency analysis on 30 years of weather data was carried out to estimate the robustness of the most satisfactory intercrop management plans. The most satisfactory intercrop management plans differed according to the priority given to managing production or reducing environmental impacts and depended on the soil depth. This confirms the conclusions drawn on the basis of various experiments assessing a limited range of intercropping policies. Overall, giving priority to the environmental criterion was favourable for cropping systems with a long intercrop period regardless of the soil type. Few management plans were suitable for all years. The observed yearly rainfall varied from 330 to 1200 mm during the 1975-2003 period, which generated marked variations in the water balance of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system. The lack of robustness of the explored intercrop management plans could be a consequence of the poor description of the management plans due to the limited combinations of technical options considered. Strategic or tactical adjustments could be introduced by farmers. We assume that more robust intercrop management plans could be developed by introducing such rules in a decision model combined with the present biophysical model.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ripoche, Aude, Celette, Florian, Cinna, Jean-Pierre, Gary, Christian
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture, U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement, Vitis vinifera, culture intercalaire, bilan hydrique, modélisation des cultures, eau du sol, rendement, développement biologique, ruissellement, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/1/document_563571.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-563571
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Vitis vinifera
culture intercalaire
bilan hydrique
modélisation des cultures
eau du sol
rendement
développement biologique
ruissellement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Vitis vinifera
culture intercalaire
bilan hydrique
modélisation des cultures
eau du sol
rendement
développement biologique
ruissellement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
spellingShingle F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Vitis vinifera
culture intercalaire
bilan hydrique
modélisation des cultures
eau du sol
rendement
développement biologique
ruissellement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Vitis vinifera
culture intercalaire
bilan hydrique
modélisation des cultures
eau du sol
rendement
développement biologique
ruissellement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
Ripoche, Aude
Celette, Florian
Cinna, Jean-Pierre
Gary, Christian
Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
description Designing intercrop management plans (IMP) to meet objectives related to both crop production and environmental impacts is a challenge for farmers. A multiple criteria decision analysis is thus needed to evaluate and rate various cropping systems in different soil and climate conditions. Different intercrop management plans in vineyards were analysed in this study so as to classify them in relation to their ability to fulfil a particular set of objectives and to deal with climatic variability. The method included five steps. A set of intercrop management plans was defined by combining the type of grass, the covered soil surface ratio, and the intercropping duration. Four evaluation criteria were chosen: grapevine vegetative development, yield, product quality and runoff. Corresponding indicators were identified and the range of values that would be desirable or not were defined. A water balance model designed for row crops was run to simulate the behaviour of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system under different management plans and at various soil depths. The model was used to calculate, for each management plan and soil depth, the four indicators and evaluate the overall agreement and discordance with various weights assigned to the four criteria. A frequency analysis on 30 years of weather data was carried out to estimate the robustness of the most satisfactory intercrop management plans. The most satisfactory intercrop management plans differed according to the priority given to managing production or reducing environmental impacts and depended on the soil depth. This confirms the conclusions drawn on the basis of various experiments assessing a limited range of intercropping policies. Overall, giving priority to the environmental criterion was favourable for cropping systems with a long intercrop period regardless of the soil type. Few management plans were suitable for all years. The observed yearly rainfall varied from 330 to 1200 mm during the 1975-2003 period, which generated marked variations in the water balance of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system. The lack of robustness of the explored intercrop management plans could be a consequence of the poor description of the management plans due to the limited combinations of technical options considered. Strategic or tactical adjustments could be introduced by farmers. We assume that more robust intercrop management plans could be developed by introducing such rules in a decision model combined with the present biophysical model.
format article
topic_facet F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Vitis vinifera
culture intercalaire
bilan hydrique
modélisation des cultures
eau du sol
rendement
développement biologique
ruissellement
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081
author Ripoche, Aude
Celette, Florian
Cinna, Jean-Pierre
Gary, Christian
author_facet Ripoche, Aude
Celette, Florian
Cinna, Jean-Pierre
Gary, Christian
author_sort Ripoche, Aude
title Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
title_short Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
title_full Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
title_fullStr Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
title_full_unstemmed Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
title_sort design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/1/document_563571.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ripocheaude designofintercropmanagementplanstofulfilproductionandenvironmentalobjectivesinvineyards
AT celetteflorian designofintercropmanagementplanstofulfilproductionandenvironmentalobjectivesinvineyards
AT cinnajeanpierre designofintercropmanagementplanstofulfilproductionandenvironmentalobjectivesinvineyards
AT garychristian designofintercropmanagementplanstofulfilproductionandenvironmentalobjectivesinvineyards
_version_ 1809110741238677504
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5635712024-08-26T16:00:55Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/ Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards. Ripoche Aude, Celette Florian, Cinna Jean-Pierre, Gary Christian. 2010. European Journal of Agronomy, 32 (1) : 30-39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005> Design of intercrop management plans to fulfil production and environmental objectives in vineyards Ripoche, Aude Celette, Florian Cinna, Jean-Pierre Gary, Christian eng 2010 European Journal of Agronomy F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement Vitis vinifera culture intercalaire bilan hydrique modélisation des cultures eau du sol rendement développement biologique ruissellement http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8283 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3910 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8311 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7205 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8488 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_921 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35388 Languedoc-Roussillon France http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4188 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3081 Designing intercrop management plans (IMP) to meet objectives related to both crop production and environmental impacts is a challenge for farmers. A multiple criteria decision analysis is thus needed to evaluate and rate various cropping systems in different soil and climate conditions. Different intercrop management plans in vineyards were analysed in this study so as to classify them in relation to their ability to fulfil a particular set of objectives and to deal with climatic variability. The method included five steps. A set of intercrop management plans was defined by combining the type of grass, the covered soil surface ratio, and the intercropping duration. Four evaluation criteria were chosen: grapevine vegetative development, yield, product quality and runoff. Corresponding indicators were identified and the range of values that would be desirable or not were defined. A water balance model designed for row crops was run to simulate the behaviour of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system under different management plans and at various soil depths. The model was used to calculate, for each management plan and soil depth, the four indicators and evaluate the overall agreement and discordance with various weights assigned to the four criteria. A frequency analysis on 30 years of weather data was carried out to estimate the robustness of the most satisfactory intercrop management plans. The most satisfactory intercrop management plans differed according to the priority given to managing production or reducing environmental impacts and depended on the soil depth. This confirms the conclusions drawn on the basis of various experiments assessing a limited range of intercropping policies. Overall, giving priority to the environmental criterion was favourable for cropping systems with a long intercrop period regardless of the soil type. Few management plans were suitable for all years. The observed yearly rainfall varied from 330 to 1200 mm during the 1975-2003 period, which generated marked variations in the water balance of the grapevine-intercrop-soil system. The lack of robustness of the explored intercrop management plans could be a consequence of the poor description of the management plans due to the limited combinations of technical options considered. Strategic or tactical adjustments could be introduced by farmers. We assume that more robust intercrop management plans could be developed by introducing such rules in a decision model combined with the present biophysical model. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/563571/1/document_563571.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005 10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.005