Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?

Background and Aims Despite their importance for plant production, estimations of below-ground biomass and its distribution in the soil are still difficult and time consuming, and no single reliable methodology is available for different root types. To identify the best method for root biomass estimations, four different methods, with labour requirements, were tested at the same location. Methods The four methods, applied in a 6-year-old Eucalyptus plantation in Congo, were based on different soil sampling volumes: auger (8 cm in diameter), monolith (25 × 25 cm quadrate), half Voronoi trench (1·5 m3) and a full Voronoi trench (3 m3), chosen as the reference method. Key Results With the reference method (0-1m deep), fine-root biomass (FRB, diameter <2 mm) was estimated at 1·8 t ha?1, medium-root biomass (MRB diameter 2-10 mm) at 2·0 t ha?1, coarse-root biomass (CRB, diameter >10 mm) at 5·6 t ha?1 and stump biomass at 6·8 t ha?1. Total below-ground biomass was estimated at 16·2 t ha?1 (root : shoot ratio equal to 0·23) for this 800 tree ha?1 eucalypt plantation density. The density of FRB was very high (0·56 t ha?1) in the top soil horizon (0-3 cm layer) and decreased greatly (0·3 t ha?1) with depth (50-100 cm). Without labour requirement considerations, no significant differences were found between the four methods for FRB and MRB; however, CRB was better estimated by the half and full Voronoi trenches. When labour requirements were considered, the most effective method was auger coring for FRB, whereas the half and full Voronoi trenches were the most appropriate methods for MRB and CRB, respectively. Conclusions As CRB combined with stumps amounted to 78 % of total below-ground biomass, a full Voronoi trench is strongly recommended when estimating total standing root biomass. Conversely, for FRB estimation, auger coring is recommended with a design pattern accounting for the spatial variability of fine-root distribution.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Levillain, Joseph, Thongo M'Bou, Armel, Deleporte, Philippe, Saint André, Laurent, Jourdan, Christophe
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:K10 - Production forestière, U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques, F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement, Eucalyptus grandis, Eucalyptus urophylla, biomasse, système racinaire, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/1/document_560875.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-560875
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5608752024-01-28T19:26:13Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/ Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations? Levillain Joseph, Thongo M'Bou Armel, Deleporte Philippe, Saint André Laurent, Jourdan Christophe. 2011. Annals of Botany, 108 (3) : 221-230.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr102 <https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr102> Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations? Levillain, Joseph Thongo M'Bou, Armel Deleporte, Philippe Saint André, Laurent Jourdan, Christophe eng 2011 Annals of Botany K10 - Production forestière U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement Eucalyptus grandis Eucalyptus urophylla biomasse système racinaire http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034 Background and Aims Despite their importance for plant production, estimations of below-ground biomass and its distribution in the soil are still difficult and time consuming, and no single reliable methodology is available for different root types. To identify the best method for root biomass estimations, four different methods, with labour requirements, were tested at the same location. Methods The four methods, applied in a 6-year-old Eucalyptus plantation in Congo, were based on different soil sampling volumes: auger (8 cm in diameter), monolith (25 × 25 cm quadrate), half Voronoi trench (1·5 m3) and a full Voronoi trench (3 m3), chosen as the reference method. Key Results With the reference method (0-1m deep), fine-root biomass (FRB, diameter &lt;2 mm) was estimated at 1·8 t ha?1, medium-root biomass (MRB diameter 2-10 mm) at 2·0 t ha?1, coarse-root biomass (CRB, diameter &gt;10 mm) at 5·6 t ha?1 and stump biomass at 6·8 t ha?1. Total below-ground biomass was estimated at 16·2 t ha?1 (root : shoot ratio equal to 0·23) for this 800 tree ha?1 eucalypt plantation density. The density of FRB was very high (0·56 t ha?1) in the top soil horizon (0-3 cm layer) and decreased greatly (0·3 t ha?1) with depth (50-100 cm). Without labour requirement considerations, no significant differences were found between the four methods for FRB and MRB; however, CRB was better estimated by the half and full Voronoi trenches. When labour requirements were considered, the most effective method was auger coring for FRB, whereas the half and full Voronoi trenches were the most appropriate methods for MRB and CRB, respectively. Conclusions As CRB combined with stumps amounted to 78 % of total below-ground biomass, a full Voronoi trench is strongly recommended when estimating total standing root biomass. Conversely, for FRB estimation, auger coring is recommended with a design pattern accounting for the spatial variability of fine-root distribution. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/1/document_560875.pdf application/pdf Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr102 10.1093/aob/mcr102 http://catalogue-bibliotheques.cirad.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=212122 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/aob/mcr102 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr102
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic K10 - Production forestière
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus urophylla
biomasse
système racinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034
K10 - Production forestière
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus urophylla
biomasse
système racinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034
spellingShingle K10 - Production forestière
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus urophylla
biomasse
système racinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034
K10 - Production forestière
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus urophylla
biomasse
système racinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034
Levillain, Joseph
Thongo M'Bou, Armel
Deleporte, Philippe
Saint André, Laurent
Jourdan, Christophe
Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
description Background and Aims Despite their importance for plant production, estimations of below-ground biomass and its distribution in the soil are still difficult and time consuming, and no single reliable methodology is available for different root types. To identify the best method for root biomass estimations, four different methods, with labour requirements, were tested at the same location. Methods The four methods, applied in a 6-year-old Eucalyptus plantation in Congo, were based on different soil sampling volumes: auger (8 cm in diameter), monolith (25 × 25 cm quadrate), half Voronoi trench (1·5 m3) and a full Voronoi trench (3 m3), chosen as the reference method. Key Results With the reference method (0-1m deep), fine-root biomass (FRB, diameter &lt;2 mm) was estimated at 1·8 t ha?1, medium-root biomass (MRB diameter 2-10 mm) at 2·0 t ha?1, coarse-root biomass (CRB, diameter &gt;10 mm) at 5·6 t ha?1 and stump biomass at 6·8 t ha?1. Total below-ground biomass was estimated at 16·2 t ha?1 (root : shoot ratio equal to 0·23) for this 800 tree ha?1 eucalypt plantation density. The density of FRB was very high (0·56 t ha?1) in the top soil horizon (0-3 cm layer) and decreased greatly (0·3 t ha?1) with depth (50-100 cm). Without labour requirement considerations, no significant differences were found between the four methods for FRB and MRB; however, CRB was better estimated by the half and full Voronoi trenches. When labour requirements were considered, the most effective method was auger coring for FRB, whereas the half and full Voronoi trenches were the most appropriate methods for MRB and CRB, respectively. Conclusions As CRB combined with stumps amounted to 78 % of total below-ground biomass, a full Voronoi trench is strongly recommended when estimating total standing root biomass. Conversely, for FRB estimation, auger coring is recommended with a design pattern accounting for the spatial variability of fine-root distribution.
format article
topic_facet K10 - Production forestière
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
F62 - Physiologie végétale - Croissance et développement
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus urophylla
biomasse
système racinaire
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2693
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_26492
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16034
author Levillain, Joseph
Thongo M'Bou, Armel
Deleporte, Philippe
Saint André, Laurent
Jourdan, Christophe
author_facet Levillain, Joseph
Thongo M'Bou, Armel
Deleporte, Philippe
Saint André, Laurent
Jourdan, Christophe
author_sort Levillain, Joseph
title Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
title_short Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
title_full Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
title_fullStr Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
title_full_unstemmed Is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in Eucalyptus forest plantations?
title_sort is the simple auger coring method reliable for below-ground standing biomass estimation in eucalyptus forest plantations?
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560875/1/document_560875.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT levillainjoseph isthesimpleaugercoringmethodreliableforbelowgroundstandingbiomassestimationineucalyptusforestplantations
AT thongombouarmel isthesimpleaugercoringmethodreliableforbelowgroundstandingbiomassestimationineucalyptusforestplantations
AT deleportephilippe isthesimpleaugercoringmethodreliableforbelowgroundstandingbiomassestimationineucalyptusforestplantations
AT saintandrelaurent isthesimpleaugercoringmethodreliableforbelowgroundstandingbiomassestimationineucalyptusforestplantations
AT jourdanchristophe isthesimpleaugercoringmethodreliableforbelowgroundstandingbiomassestimationineucalyptusforestplantations
_version_ 1792497881847955456