Systems analysis in AIS: potentials and pitfalls

Agricultural innovation systems are complex, multi-layered, and can be difficult to define and analyse. In this paper, we provide examples of ‘systems analysis’: describing the context, what was done, and how the outcomes informed broader research and development activities. The five cases describe analyses of: i) agricultural systems in North-West Vietnam; ii) household food security in Central Vietnam; iii) agricultural innovation systems in Central Africa; iv) wheat commodity systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, and v) the national agricultural research system in Papua New Guinea. These cases show that while there is no single best method to conduct systems analysis within a broader AIS approach, ‘good’ systems analysis demonstrates several common characteristics. Suggestions for system analysis in practice include: clarifying objectives and expectations; balancing breadth and depth; paying attention to power dynamics; avoiding an assumption of predictability; careful mixing of quantitative and qualitative methods; and a keeping a focus on informing action.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roo, Nina de, Hawkins, Richard, Schut, Marc, Salomons, Michael, Beshah, Tesfaye, Staal, Steven J., Kassam, Shinan
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Royal Tropical Institute 2017
Subjects:agricultural research, systems analysis, technology transfer, food security, agricultural innovation systems, wheat commodity systems, farming systems research, value chain approaches,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82610
https://www.kit.nl/working-paper-series-2017-11-systems-analysis-in-ais-potentials-and-pitfalls/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!