Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change

The types of technology change catalyzed by research interventions in integrated natural resource management (INRM) are likely to require much more social negotiation and adaptation than are changes related to plant breeding, the dominant discipline within the system of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Conceptual models for developing and delivering high-yielding varieties have proven inadequate for delivering natural resource management (NRM) technologies that are adopted in farmers' fields. Successful INRM requires tools and approaches that can blend the technical with the social, so that people from different disciplines and social backgrounds can effectively work and communicate with each other. This paper develops the "follow-the-technology" (FTT) approach to catalyzing, managing, and evaluating rural technology change as a framework that both "hard" and "soft" scientists can work with. To deal with complexity, INRM needs ways of working that are adaptive and flexible. The FTT approach uses technology as the entry point into a complex situation to determine what is important. In this way, it narrows the research arena to achievable boundaries. The methodology can also be used to catalyze technology change, both within and outside agriculture. The FTT approach can make it possible to channel the innovative potential of local people that is necessary in INRM to "scale up" from the pilot site to the landscape. The FTT approach is built on an analogy between technology change and Darwinian evolution, specifically between "learning selection" and natural selection. In learning selection, stakeholders experiment with a new technology and carry out the evolutionary roles of novelty generation, selection, and promulgation. The motivation to participate is a "plausible promise" made by the R&D team to solve a real farming problem. Case studies are presented from a spectrum of technologies to show that repeated learning selection cycles can result in an improvement in the performance of the plausible promise through adaptation and a sense of ownership by the stakeholders.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douthwaite, Boru, Haan, Nicoline C. de, Manyong, Victor M., Keatinge, J.D.H.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2001
Subjects:natural resources, resource management, technological changes, community involvement, recursos naturales, manejo de los recursos, cambio tecnológico, participación comunitaria,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43236
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art13/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-43236
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-432362023-01-11T20:02:25Z Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change Douthwaite, Boru Haan, Nicoline C. de Manyong, Victor M. Keatinge, J.D.H. natural resources resource management technological changes community involvement recursos naturales manejo de los recursos cambio tecnológico participación comunitaria The types of technology change catalyzed by research interventions in integrated natural resource management (INRM) are likely to require much more social negotiation and adaptation than are changes related to plant breeding, the dominant discipline within the system of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Conceptual models for developing and delivering high-yielding varieties have proven inadequate for delivering natural resource management (NRM) technologies that are adopted in farmers' fields. Successful INRM requires tools and approaches that can blend the technical with the social, so that people from different disciplines and social backgrounds can effectively work and communicate with each other. This paper develops the "follow-the-technology" (FTT) approach to catalyzing, managing, and evaluating rural technology change as a framework that both "hard" and "soft" scientists can work with. To deal with complexity, INRM needs ways of working that are adaptive and flexible. The FTT approach uses technology as the entry point into a complex situation to determine what is important. In this way, it narrows the research arena to achievable boundaries. The methodology can also be used to catalyze technology change, both within and outside agriculture. The FTT approach can make it possible to channel the innovative potential of local people that is necessary in INRM to "scale up" from the pilot site to the landscape. The FTT approach is built on an analogy between technology change and Darwinian evolution, specifically between "learning selection" and natural selection. In learning selection, stakeholders experiment with a new technology and carry out the evolutionary roles of novelty generation, selection, and promulgation. The motivation to participate is a "plausible promise" made by the R&D team to solve a real farming problem. Case studies are presented from a spectrum of technologies to show that repeated learning selection cycles can result in an improvement in the performance of the plausible promise through adaptation and a sense of ownership by the stakeholders. 2001 2014-09-24T08:41:49Z 2014-09-24T08:41:49Z Journal Article 1708-3087 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43236 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art13/ en Open Access Conservation Ecology
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic natural resources
resource management
technological changes
community involvement
recursos naturales
manejo de los recursos
cambio tecnológico
participación comunitaria
natural resources
resource management
technological changes
community involvement
recursos naturales
manejo de los recursos
cambio tecnológico
participación comunitaria
spellingShingle natural resources
resource management
technological changes
community involvement
recursos naturales
manejo de los recursos
cambio tecnológico
participación comunitaria
natural resources
resource management
technological changes
community involvement
recursos naturales
manejo de los recursos
cambio tecnológico
participación comunitaria
Douthwaite, Boru
Haan, Nicoline C. de
Manyong, Victor M.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
description The types of technology change catalyzed by research interventions in integrated natural resource management (INRM) are likely to require much more social negotiation and adaptation than are changes related to plant breeding, the dominant discipline within the system of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Conceptual models for developing and delivering high-yielding varieties have proven inadequate for delivering natural resource management (NRM) technologies that are adopted in farmers' fields. Successful INRM requires tools and approaches that can blend the technical with the social, so that people from different disciplines and social backgrounds can effectively work and communicate with each other. This paper develops the "follow-the-technology" (FTT) approach to catalyzing, managing, and evaluating rural technology change as a framework that both "hard" and "soft" scientists can work with. To deal with complexity, INRM needs ways of working that are adaptive and flexible. The FTT approach uses technology as the entry point into a complex situation to determine what is important. In this way, it narrows the research arena to achievable boundaries. The methodology can also be used to catalyze technology change, both within and outside agriculture. The FTT approach can make it possible to channel the innovative potential of local people that is necessary in INRM to "scale up" from the pilot site to the landscape. The FTT approach is built on an analogy between technology change and Darwinian evolution, specifically between "learning selection" and natural selection. In learning selection, stakeholders experiment with a new technology and carry out the evolutionary roles of novelty generation, selection, and promulgation. The motivation to participate is a "plausible promise" made by the R&D team to solve a real farming problem. Case studies are presented from a spectrum of technologies to show that repeated learning selection cycles can result in an improvement in the performance of the plausible promise through adaptation and a sense of ownership by the stakeholders.
format Journal Article
topic_facet natural resources
resource management
technological changes
community involvement
recursos naturales
manejo de los recursos
cambio tecnológico
participación comunitaria
author Douthwaite, Boru
Haan, Nicoline C. de
Manyong, Victor M.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
author_facet Douthwaite, Boru
Haan, Nicoline C. de
Manyong, Victor M.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
author_sort Douthwaite, Boru
title Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
title_short Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
title_full Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
title_fullStr Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
title_full_unstemmed Blending "hard" and "soft" science: The "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
title_sort blending "hard" and "soft" science: the "follow-the-technology" approach to catalyzing and evaluating technology change
publishDate 2001
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43236
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art13/
work_keys_str_mv AT douthwaiteboru blendinghardandsoftsciencethefollowthetechnologyapproachtocatalyzingandevaluatingtechnologychange
AT haannicolinecde blendinghardandsoftsciencethefollowthetechnologyapproachtocatalyzingandevaluatingtechnologychange
AT manyongvictorm blendinghardandsoftsciencethefollowthetechnologyapproachtocatalyzingandevaluatingtechnologychange
AT keatingejdh blendinghardandsoftsciencethefollowthetechnologyapproachtocatalyzingandevaluatingtechnologychange
_version_ 1779060052509851648