Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.

Direct comparisons are made between profiles of the moon’s limb of Weimer and of Watts. Comparison made at 177 points on the moon’s limb shows that Weimer’s centre deviates 0". 39 in the position angle of 336° from Watts' centre, while their adopted radii of the moon are practically identical. Another comparison is made at every 5° along the moon’s limb for 9 cases of libration, i.e. combination of ι= -6°, 0°, +6° and b=十6°, 0°, -6°. Discrepancy between Watts’ and Weimer's charts differs for eastern and western limbs from each other as well as for libration. There exists no systematic dependence between relative positions of centres and libration. As a whole, Weimer’s chart deviates 0". 43 in the direction of 345° for eastern limb and 0". 27 in the direction of 296° for western limb from Watts'. The effect of the discrepancy between both charts in position of centre is found clearly in the difference of Δ T evaluated from occultation observations with these respective profile charts, and verifies that our values of Weimer’s centre relative to Watts’ are adequate,

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinzi, M. Akira, Suzuki, Hirokazu
Format: Journal Contribution biblioteca
Language:Japanese
Published: 1967
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/16418
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-aquadocs-1834-16418
record_format koha
spelling dig-aquadocs-1834-164182021-05-19T06:56:30Z Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer. Sinzi, M. Akira Suzuki, Hirokazu Direct comparisons are made between profiles of the moon’s limb of Weimer and of Watts. Comparison made at 177 points on the moon’s limb shows that Weimer’s centre deviates 0". 39 in the position angle of 336° from Watts' centre, while their adopted radii of the moon are practically identical. Another comparison is made at every 5° along the moon’s limb for 9 cases of libration, i.e. combination of ι= -6°, 0°, +6° and b=十6°, 0°, -6°. Discrepancy between Watts’ and Weimer's charts differs for eastern and western limbs from each other as well as for libration. There exists no systematic dependence between relative positions of centres and libration. As a whole, Weimer’s chart deviates 0". 43 in the direction of 345° for eastern limb and 0". 27 in the direction of 296° for western limb from Watts'. The effect of the discrepancy between both charts in position of centre is found clearly in the difference of Δ T evaluated from occultation observations with these respective profile charts, and verifies that our values of Weimer’s centre relative to Watts’ are adequate, Published 2020-02-20T10:35:45Z 2020-02-20T10:35:45Z 1967 Journal Contribution Refereed http://hdl.handle.net/1834/16418 ja https://www1.kaiho.mlit.go.jp/GIJUTSUKOKUSAI/KENKYU/report/rhr03/rhr03-08.pdf pp.77-82
institution UNESCO
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-aquadocs
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Repositorio AQUADOCS
language Japanese
description Direct comparisons are made between profiles of the moon’s limb of Weimer and of Watts. Comparison made at 177 points on the moon’s limb shows that Weimer’s centre deviates 0". 39 in the position angle of 336° from Watts' centre, while their adopted radii of the moon are practically identical. Another comparison is made at every 5° along the moon’s limb for 9 cases of libration, i.e. combination of ι= -6°, 0°, +6° and b=十6°, 0°, -6°. Discrepancy between Watts’ and Weimer's charts differs for eastern and western limbs from each other as well as for libration. There exists no systematic dependence between relative positions of centres and libration. As a whole, Weimer’s chart deviates 0". 43 in the direction of 345° for eastern limb and 0". 27 in the direction of 296° for western limb from Watts'. The effect of the discrepancy between both charts in position of centre is found clearly in the difference of Δ T evaluated from occultation observations with these respective profile charts, and verifies that our values of Weimer’s centre relative to Watts’ are adequate,
format Journal Contribution
author Sinzi, M. Akira
Suzuki, Hirokazu
spellingShingle Sinzi, M. Akira
Suzuki, Hirokazu
Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
author_facet Sinzi, M. Akira
Suzuki, Hirokazu
author_sort Sinzi, M. Akira
title Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
title_short Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
title_full Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
title_fullStr Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the lunar profiles of Watts and of Welmer.
title_sort comparison of the lunar profiles of watts and of welmer.
publishDate 1967
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/16418
work_keys_str_mv AT sinzimakira comparisonofthelunarprofilesofwattsandofwelmer
AT suzukihirokazu comparisonofthelunarprofilesofwattsandofwelmer
_version_ 1756076745118711808