Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /

The evaluation of diabetic retinopathy is often difficult, because the clinical picture is complex due to the mUltiplicity of symptoms. Omission of treatment by photocoagulation at the right moment may have grave consequences. Forthe evaluation of diabetic retinopathy we have to estimate first the developmental degree of each symptom and secondly we have to estimate what the natural history of each particular retinopathy will be. There exists a number of classification systems, into the frame of which the clinical picture of diabetic retinopathy can be placed. Without entering into the details of these systems we want to mention that our classification has been developed from the method of Oakley and the classification model conceived at the Airlie House meeting in 1968. The essence of this classification is that standard pictures are used for the estimation of the developmental degree of the different symptoms in diabetic retinopathy. In our classification we use for each symptom two standard photographs instead of one, as originally proposed at the Airlie House meeting. (1,2). Standard photograph number one stands for the moderate (grade 1 ) manifestation and standard photograph numbertwo stands forthe marked (grade 2) manifestation of the symptom. Ifthe manifestation ofthe sympton is less marked than in standard photograph one, it is referred to as < 1 ; if it is more marked than in standard photograph two, it is referred to as > 2.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riaskoff, S. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1976
Subjects:Medicine., Diabetes., Ophthalmology., Medicine & Public Health.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1581-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:194321
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Medicine.
Diabetes.
Ophthalmology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Ophthalmology.
Diabetes.
Medicine.
Diabetes.
Ophthalmology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Ophthalmology.
Diabetes.
spellingShingle Medicine.
Diabetes.
Ophthalmology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Ophthalmology.
Diabetes.
Medicine.
Diabetes.
Ophthalmology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Ophthalmology.
Diabetes.
Riaskoff, S. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
description The evaluation of diabetic retinopathy is often difficult, because the clinical picture is complex due to the mUltiplicity of symptoms. Omission of treatment by photocoagulation at the right moment may have grave consequences. Forthe evaluation of diabetic retinopathy we have to estimate first the developmental degree of each symptom and secondly we have to estimate what the natural history of each particular retinopathy will be. There exists a number of classification systems, into the frame of which the clinical picture of diabetic retinopathy can be placed. Without entering into the details of these systems we want to mention that our classification has been developed from the method of Oakley and the classification model conceived at the Airlie House meeting in 1968. The essence of this classification is that standard pictures are used for the estimation of the developmental degree of the different symptoms in diabetic retinopathy. In our classification we use for each symptom two standard photographs instead of one, as originally proposed at the Airlie House meeting. (1,2). Standard photograph number one stands for the moderate (grade 1 ) manifestation and standard photograph numbertwo stands forthe marked (grade 2) manifestation of the symptom. Ifthe manifestation ofthe sympton is less marked than in standard photograph one, it is referred to as < 1 ; if it is more marked than in standard photograph two, it is referred to as > 2.
format Texto
topic_facet Medicine.
Diabetes.
Ophthalmology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Ophthalmology.
Diabetes.
author Riaskoff, S. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Riaskoff, S. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Riaskoff, S. author.
title Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
title_short Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
title_full Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
title_fullStr Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
title_full_unstemmed Diabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] /
title_sort diabetic retinopathy [electronic resource] /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands,
publishDate 1976
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1581-3
work_keys_str_mv AT riaskoffsauthor diabeticretinopathyelectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice diabeticretinopathyelectronicresource
_version_ 1756266589471113216
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1943212018-07-30T23:19:54ZDiabetic Retinopathy [electronic resource] / Riaskoff, S. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands,1976.engThe evaluation of diabetic retinopathy is often difficult, because the clinical picture is complex due to the mUltiplicity of symptoms. Omission of treatment by photocoagulation at the right moment may have grave consequences. Forthe evaluation of diabetic retinopathy we have to estimate first the developmental degree of each symptom and secondly we have to estimate what the natural history of each particular retinopathy will be. There exists a number of classification systems, into the frame of which the clinical picture of diabetic retinopathy can be placed. Without entering into the details of these systems we want to mention that our classification has been developed from the method of Oakley and the classification model conceived at the Airlie House meeting in 1968. The essence of this classification is that standard pictures are used for the estimation of the developmental degree of the different symptoms in diabetic retinopathy. In our classification we use for each symptom two standard photographs instead of one, as originally proposed at the Airlie House meeting. (1,2). Standard photograph number one stands for the moderate (grade 1 ) manifestation and standard photograph numbertwo stands forthe marked (grade 2) manifestation of the symptom. Ifthe manifestation ofthe sympton is less marked than in standard photograph one, it is referred to as < 1 ; if it is more marked than in standard photograph two, it is referred to as > 2.I Introduction -- II Evaluation of Symptoms in Diabetic Retinopathy in Relation to Prognosis and Treatment with Photocoagulation Standard Photographs -- 1 microaneurysms and intraretinal haemorrhages -- 2 lipoid deposits or hard exudates -- 3 changes of the veins—diabetic venopathy -- 4 changes of the arterioles—diabetic arteriolopathy -- 5 neovascularization of the retina -- 6 neovascularization of the disc -- 7 proliferation of fibrous tissue -- 8 preretinal haemorrhages -- 9 lesions of the macular area -- III Table with Classification Examples -- IV Some Guide Lines to Photocoagulation Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy -- 1 plan of treatment—general considerations -- 2 intraretinal haemorrhages, microaneurysms and exudates -- 3 neovascularization of the retina -- 4 neovascularization on the disc -- 5 some difficulties in photocoagulation treatment -- V Discussion -- 1 evaluation of symptoms and prognosis -- 2 effect of treatment with photocoagulation -- 3 rationale of treatment with photocoagulation -- References.The evaluation of diabetic retinopathy is often difficult, because the clinical picture is complex due to the mUltiplicity of symptoms. Omission of treatment by photocoagulation at the right moment may have grave consequences. Forthe evaluation of diabetic retinopathy we have to estimate first the developmental degree of each symptom and secondly we have to estimate what the natural history of each particular retinopathy will be. There exists a number of classification systems, into the frame of which the clinical picture of diabetic retinopathy can be placed. Without entering into the details of these systems we want to mention that our classification has been developed from the method of Oakley and the classification model conceived at the Airlie House meeting in 1968. The essence of this classification is that standard pictures are used for the estimation of the developmental degree of the different symptoms in diabetic retinopathy. In our classification we use for each symptom two standard photographs instead of one, as originally proposed at the Airlie House meeting. (1,2). Standard photograph number one stands for the moderate (grade 1 ) manifestation and standard photograph numbertwo stands forthe marked (grade 2) manifestation of the symptom. Ifthe manifestation ofthe sympton is less marked than in standard photograph one, it is referred to as < 1 ; if it is more marked than in standard photograph two, it is referred to as > 2.Medicine.Diabetes.Ophthalmology.Medicine & Public Health.Ophthalmology.Diabetes.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1581-3URN:ISBN:9789401015813