Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /

Cesarean section rates Percentage Indication Low High Failure to progress 2. 0 4. 0 Repeat cesarean section 2. 0 6. 0 Breech and abnormal lie 1. 3 3. 5 Fetal distress 1. 5 3. 0 Third-trimester bleeding 1. 0 1. 0 Totals 7. 8 17. 5 l From Quilligan, by permission of Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology. vaginal delivery, I have yet to meet a physician who would do something they believed would harm their patient even if they were paid ten times as much for a section. On the other hand, there are fears and misconceptions. I have heard many doctors say "I have never been sued for a section I did, but I have been sued for the section I did not do. " The fear of not having performed a section in my opinion is real, although difficult to prove, and until the public can be educated that cesarean section delivery cannot eradicate fetal death and damage, this fear will remain and will be responsible for some unnecessary cesarean sections. Bruce Flamm and I hope this book will correct misconceptions that have been responsible for many unnecessary cesarean sections. I am still frequently asked the same old question: What is an ideal cesarean section rate? I still give an answer similar to the 1983 answer, perhaps somewhat modified.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Flamm, Bruce L. editor., Quilligan, Edward J. editor., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: New York, NY : Springer New York, 1995
Subjects:Life sciences., Gynecology., Obstetrics., Ecology., Life Sciences., Obstetrics/Perinatology.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2482-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:175284
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1752842018-07-30T22:53:23ZCesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization / Flamm, Bruce L. editor. Quilligan, Edward J. editor. SpringerLink (Online service) textNew York, NY : Springer New York,1995.engCesarean section rates Percentage Indication Low High Failure to progress 2. 0 4. 0 Repeat cesarean section 2. 0 6. 0 Breech and abnormal lie 1. 3 3. 5 Fetal distress 1. 5 3. 0 Third-trimester bleeding 1. 0 1. 0 Totals 7. 8 17. 5 l From Quilligan, by permission of Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology. vaginal delivery, I have yet to meet a physician who would do something they believed would harm their patient even if they were paid ten times as much for a section. On the other hand, there are fears and misconceptions. I have heard many doctors say "I have never been sued for a section I did, but I have been sued for the section I did not do. " The fear of not having performed a section in my opinion is real, although difficult to prove, and until the public can be educated that cesarean section delivery cannot eradicate fetal death and damage, this fear will remain and will be responsible for some unnecessary cesarean sections. Bruce Flamm and I hope this book will correct misconceptions that have been responsible for many unnecessary cesarean sections. I am still frequently asked the same old question: What is an ideal cesarean section rate? I still give an answer similar to the 1983 answer, perhaps somewhat modified.1 Cesarean Delivery in the United States: A Summary of the Past 20 Years -- 2 Worldwide Utilization of Cesarean Section -- 3 Dystocia and “Failure to Progress” in Labor -- 4 Active Management of Labor -- 5 Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section -- 6 Breech Presentation -- 7 Cesarean Section for Fetal Distress -- 8 Fetal Macrosomia -- 9 Twin Gestation and Multiple Births -- 10 Genital Herpes: Contemporary Management -- 11 Methods for Safe Reduction of Cesarean Section Rates -- 12 Cesarean Delivery: A Medical-Legal Perspective -- 13 Economic Considerations in Cesarean Section Use -- 14 Ethical Issues in the Utilization of Cesarean Section -- 15 The Patient Who Demands Cesarean Delivery -- 16 The Impact of Midwifery Care, Childbirth Preparation, and Labor Support on Cesarean Section Rates -- 17 Cesarean Projects at the State and National Level -- 18 Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization of Cesarean Operations.Cesarean section rates Percentage Indication Low High Failure to progress 2. 0 4. 0 Repeat cesarean section 2. 0 6. 0 Breech and abnormal lie 1. 3 3. 5 Fetal distress 1. 5 3. 0 Third-trimester bleeding 1. 0 1. 0 Totals 7. 8 17. 5 l From Quilligan, by permission of Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology. vaginal delivery, I have yet to meet a physician who would do something they believed would harm their patient even if they were paid ten times as much for a section. On the other hand, there are fears and misconceptions. I have heard many doctors say "I have never been sued for a section I did, but I have been sued for the section I did not do. " The fear of not having performed a section in my opinion is real, although difficult to prove, and until the public can be educated that cesarean section delivery cannot eradicate fetal death and damage, this fear will remain and will be responsible for some unnecessary cesarean sections. Bruce Flamm and I hope this book will correct misconceptions that have been responsible for many unnecessary cesarean sections. I am still frequently asked the same old question: What is an ideal cesarean section rate? I still give an answer similar to the 1983 answer, perhaps somewhat modified.Life sciences.Gynecology.Obstetrics.Ecology.Life Sciences.Ecology.Gynecology.Obstetrics/Perinatology.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2482-2URN:ISBN:9781461224822
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Life sciences.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics.
Ecology.
Life Sciences.
Ecology.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics/Perinatology.
Life sciences.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics.
Ecology.
Life Sciences.
Ecology.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics/Perinatology.
spellingShingle Life sciences.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics.
Ecology.
Life Sciences.
Ecology.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics/Perinatology.
Life sciences.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics.
Ecology.
Life Sciences.
Ecology.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics/Perinatology.
Flamm, Bruce L. editor.
Quilligan, Edward J. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
description Cesarean section rates Percentage Indication Low High Failure to progress 2. 0 4. 0 Repeat cesarean section 2. 0 6. 0 Breech and abnormal lie 1. 3 3. 5 Fetal distress 1. 5 3. 0 Third-trimester bleeding 1. 0 1. 0 Totals 7. 8 17. 5 l From Quilligan, by permission of Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology. vaginal delivery, I have yet to meet a physician who would do something they believed would harm their patient even if they were paid ten times as much for a section. On the other hand, there are fears and misconceptions. I have heard many doctors say "I have never been sued for a section I did, but I have been sued for the section I did not do. " The fear of not having performed a section in my opinion is real, although difficult to prove, and until the public can be educated that cesarean section delivery cannot eradicate fetal death and damage, this fear will remain and will be responsible for some unnecessary cesarean sections. Bruce Flamm and I hope this book will correct misconceptions that have been responsible for many unnecessary cesarean sections. I am still frequently asked the same old question: What is an ideal cesarean section rate? I still give an answer similar to the 1983 answer, perhaps somewhat modified.
format Texto
topic_facet Life sciences.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics.
Ecology.
Life Sciences.
Ecology.
Gynecology.
Obstetrics/Perinatology.
author Flamm, Bruce L. editor.
Quilligan, Edward J. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Flamm, Bruce L. editor.
Quilligan, Edward J. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Flamm, Bruce L. editor.
title Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
title_short Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
title_full Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
title_fullStr Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean Section [electronic resource] : Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization /
title_sort cesarean section [electronic resource] : guidelines for appropriate utilization /
publisher New York, NY : Springer New York,
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2482-2
work_keys_str_mv AT flammbruceleditor cesareansectionelectronicresourceguidelinesforappropriateutilization
AT quilliganedwardjeditor cesareansectionelectronicresourceguidelinesforappropriateutilization
AT springerlinkonlineservice cesareansectionelectronicresourceguidelinesforappropriateutilization
_version_ 1756263979257167872