Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /

Health researchers routinely evaluate health and illness across subgroups defined by their sex, gender, ethnicity, and race. All too often, these classifications are proffered as an explanation for any differences that may be detected, for example, in access to care, frequency of disease, or response to treatment. Relatively few researchers, however, have examined what these classifications mean on a theoretical level or in the context of their own research. Assume, for example, that a researcher concludes from his or her data that African- Americans utilize certain surgical procedures less frequently than whites. This conclusion may mean little without an examination of the various underlying issues. Is there such a construct as race at all? How were whites and African-Americans classified as such? Does this finding reflect inappropriate overutilization of the specific procedures among whites or inappropriate underutilization among African-Americans? To what extent are socioeconomic status and method of payment related to the less frequent use? Are there differences in the manner in which health care providers present the various treatment options to whites and to African- Americans that could account for these differences in utilization? Are there differences in health care-seeking and health care preferences between the two groups that would explain the difference in utilization? Is the racial classification a surrogate measure for another variable that has remained unidentified and unmeasured? All too often, unfortunately, such issues are ignored or lightly dismissed with an entreaty for additional research.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loue, Sana. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Boston, MA : Springer US, 1999
Subjects:Medicine., Public health., Health promotion., Anthropology., Medicine & Public Health., Public Health., Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b112292
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:173723
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Medicine.
Public health.
Health promotion.
Anthropology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Public Health.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.
Anthropology.
Medicine.
Public health.
Health promotion.
Anthropology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Public Health.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.
Anthropology.
spellingShingle Medicine.
Public health.
Health promotion.
Anthropology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Public Health.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.
Anthropology.
Medicine.
Public health.
Health promotion.
Anthropology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Public Health.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.
Anthropology.
Loue, Sana. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
description Health researchers routinely evaluate health and illness across subgroups defined by their sex, gender, ethnicity, and race. All too often, these classifications are proffered as an explanation for any differences that may be detected, for example, in access to care, frequency of disease, or response to treatment. Relatively few researchers, however, have examined what these classifications mean on a theoretical level or in the context of their own research. Assume, for example, that a researcher concludes from his or her data that African- Americans utilize certain surgical procedures less frequently than whites. This conclusion may mean little without an examination of the various underlying issues. Is there such a construct as race at all? How were whites and African-Americans classified as such? Does this finding reflect inappropriate overutilization of the specific procedures among whites or inappropriate underutilization among African-Americans? To what extent are socioeconomic status and method of payment related to the less frequent use? Are there differences in the manner in which health care providers present the various treatment options to whites and to African- Americans that could account for these differences in utilization? Are there differences in health care-seeking and health care preferences between the two groups that would explain the difference in utilization? Is the racial classification a surrogate measure for another variable that has remained unidentified and unmeasured? All too often, unfortunately, such issues are ignored or lightly dismissed with an entreaty for additional research.
format Texto
topic_facet Medicine.
Public health.
Health promotion.
Anthropology.
Medicine & Public Health.
Public Health.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.
Anthropology.
author Loue, Sana. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Loue, Sana. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Loue, Sana. author.
title Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
title_short Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
title_full Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
title_fullStr Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
title_full_unstemmed Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] /
title_sort gender, ethnicity, and health research [electronic resource] /
publisher Boston, MA : Springer US,
publishDate 1999
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b112292
work_keys_str_mv AT louesanaauthor genderethnicityandhealthresearchelectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice genderethnicityandhealthresearchelectronicresource
_version_ 1756263764939767808
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1737232018-07-30T22:51:20ZGender, Ethnicity, and Health Research [electronic resource] / Loue, Sana. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textBoston, MA : Springer US,1999.engHealth researchers routinely evaluate health and illness across subgroups defined by their sex, gender, ethnicity, and race. All too often, these classifications are proffered as an explanation for any differences that may be detected, for example, in access to care, frequency of disease, or response to treatment. Relatively few researchers, however, have examined what these classifications mean on a theoretical level or in the context of their own research. Assume, for example, that a researcher concludes from his or her data that African- Americans utilize certain surgical procedures less frequently than whites. This conclusion may mean little without an examination of the various underlying issues. Is there such a construct as race at all? How were whites and African-Americans classified as such? Does this finding reflect inappropriate overutilization of the specific procedures among whites or inappropriate underutilization among African-Americans? To what extent are socioeconomic status and method of payment related to the less frequent use? Are there differences in the manner in which health care providers present the various treatment options to whites and to African- Americans that could account for these differences in utilization? Are there differences in health care-seeking and health care preferences between the two groups that would explain the difference in utilization? Is the racial classification a surrogate measure for another variable that has remained unidentified and unmeasured? All too often, unfortunately, such issues are ignored or lightly dismissed with an entreaty for additional research.Prologue: Understanding Social Constructs -- Prologue: Understanding Social Constructs -- Foundations -- Ethical Principles Governing Research Involving Human Participants -- Principles of Research Design -- Race and Ethnicity -- Sex, Gender, and Sexual Orientation -- Health Care Utilization and Access -- The Health of Communities -- African-American Health -- Asian and Pacific Islander Health -- Hispanic Health -- The Health of Native Americans -- Women and Health -- Sexual Orientation and Health -- Case Studies of Disease -- Case Study One Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) -- Case Study Two Diabetes Mellitus.Health researchers routinely evaluate health and illness across subgroups defined by their sex, gender, ethnicity, and race. All too often, these classifications are proffered as an explanation for any differences that may be detected, for example, in access to care, frequency of disease, or response to treatment. Relatively few researchers, however, have examined what these classifications mean on a theoretical level or in the context of their own research. Assume, for example, that a researcher concludes from his or her data that African- Americans utilize certain surgical procedures less frequently than whites. This conclusion may mean little without an examination of the various underlying issues. Is there such a construct as race at all? How were whites and African-Americans classified as such? Does this finding reflect inappropriate overutilization of the specific procedures among whites or inappropriate underutilization among African-Americans? To what extent are socioeconomic status and method of payment related to the less frequent use? Are there differences in the manner in which health care providers present the various treatment options to whites and to African- Americans that could account for these differences in utilization? Are there differences in health care-seeking and health care preferences between the two groups that would explain the difference in utilization? Is the racial classification a surrogate measure for another variable that has remained unidentified and unmeasured? All too often, unfortunately, such issues are ignored or lightly dismissed with an entreaty for additional research.Medicine.Public health.Health promotion.Anthropology.Medicine & Public Health.Public Health.Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.Anthropology.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b112292URN:ISBN:9780306475696