Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs

Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knowlton, Jessie L. autora, Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Aves, Hábitats forestales, Pago por servicios ecosistémicos, Energía biomásica, Percepción social, Cambio de uso de la tierra,
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=34025&context=michigantech-p
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:60828
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:608282024-07-10T11:26:45ZBirds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs Knowlton, Jessie L. autora Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora textengAlthough renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.AvesHábitats forestalesPago por servicios ecosistémicosEnergía biomásicaPercepción socialCambio de uso de la tierraLandhttps://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=34025&context=michigantech-pAcceso en línea sin restricciones
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Aves
Hábitats forestales
Pago por servicios ecosistémicos
Energía biomásica
Percepción social
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Aves
Hábitats forestales
Pago por servicios ecosistémicos
Energía biomásica
Percepción social
Cambio de uso de la tierra
spellingShingle Aves
Hábitats forestales
Pago por servicios ecosistémicos
Energía biomásica
Percepción social
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Aves
Hábitats forestales
Pago por servicios ecosistémicos
Energía biomásica
Percepción social
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
description Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.
format Texto
topic_facet Aves
Hábitats forestales
Pago por servicios ecosistémicos
Energía biomásica
Percepción social
Cambio de uso de la tierra
author Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
author_facet Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
author_sort Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
title Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_short Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_full Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_fullStr Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_full_unstemmed Birds and bioenergy within the Americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_sort birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross-national, social–ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
url https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=34025&context=michigantech-p
work_keys_str_mv AT knowltonjessielautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT halvorsenkathleeneautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
_version_ 1806028183255908352