Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs

Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knowlton, Jessie L. autora, Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora, Flaspohler, David J. autor, Webster, Christopher R. autor, Abrams, Jesse autor, Almeida, Sara M. autora, Arriaga Weiss, Stefan Louis Doctor autor 15154, Barnett, Brad autor, Cardoso, Maíra R. autora, Cerqueira, Pablo V. autor, Córdoba, Diana autora, Dantas Santos, Marcos Persio autor, Dunn, Jennifer L. autora, Eastmond Spencer, Amarella Doctora autora 14150, Jarvi, Gina M. autora, Licata, Julian A. autor, Mata Zayas, Ena autora, Medeiros, Rodrigo, Mesa Jurado, María Azahara Doctora autora 12326, Moo Culebro, Lizbeth Yamily autora 20908, Moseley, Cassandra autora, Nielsen, Erik autor, Phifer, Colin C. autor, Pischke, Erin C. autor, Schelly, Chelsea autora, Selfa, Theresa autora, Silva, Chelsea A. autora, Souza, Tatiana autora, Sweitz, Samuel R. autor, Vázquez Navarrete, César J. autor
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Aves, Energía biomásica, Servicios ecosistémicos, Elaeis guineensis, Eucalyptus, Populus, Hábitats forestales, Cambio de uso de la tierra, Percepción social, Artfrosur,
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/258
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:60725
record_format koha
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Aves
Energía biomásica
Servicios ecosistémicos
Elaeis guineensis
Eucalyptus
Populus
Hábitats forestales
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Percepción social
Artfrosur
Aves
Energía biomásica
Servicios ecosistémicos
Elaeis guineensis
Eucalyptus
Populus
Hábitats forestales
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Percepción social
Artfrosur
spellingShingle Aves
Energía biomásica
Servicios ecosistémicos
Elaeis guineensis
Eucalyptus
Populus
Hábitats forestales
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Percepción social
Artfrosur
Aves
Energía biomásica
Servicios ecosistémicos
Elaeis guineensis
Eucalyptus
Populus
Hábitats forestales
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Percepción social
Artfrosur
Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
Flaspohler, David J. autor
Webster, Christopher R. autor
Abrams, Jesse autor
Almeida, Sara M. autora
Arriaga Weiss, Stefan Louis Doctor autor 15154
Barnett, Brad autor
Cardoso, Maíra R. autora
Cerqueira, Pablo V. autor
Córdoba, Diana autora
Dantas Santos, Marcos Persio autor
Dunn, Jennifer L. autora
Eastmond Spencer, Amarella Doctora autora 14150
Jarvi, Gina M. autora
Licata, Julian A. autor
Mata Zayas, Ena autora
Medeiros, Rodrigo
Mesa Jurado, María Azahara Doctora autora 12326
Moo Culebro, Lizbeth Yamily autora 20908
Moseley, Cassandra autora
Nielsen, Erik autor
Phifer, Colin C. autor
Pischke, Erin C. autor
Schelly, Chelsea autora
Selfa, Theresa autora
Silva, Chelsea A. autora
Souza, Tatiana autora
Sweitz, Samuel R. autor
Vázquez Navarrete, César J. autor
Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
description Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.
format Texto
topic_facet Aves
Energía biomásica
Servicios ecosistémicos
Elaeis guineensis
Eucalyptus
Populus
Hábitats forestales
Cambio de uso de la tierra
Percepción social
Artfrosur
author Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
Flaspohler, David J. autor
Webster, Christopher R. autor
Abrams, Jesse autor
Almeida, Sara M. autora
Arriaga Weiss, Stefan Louis Doctor autor 15154
Barnett, Brad autor
Cardoso, Maíra R. autora
Cerqueira, Pablo V. autor
Córdoba, Diana autora
Dantas Santos, Marcos Persio autor
Dunn, Jennifer L. autora
Eastmond Spencer, Amarella Doctora autora 14150
Jarvi, Gina M. autora
Licata, Julian A. autor
Mata Zayas, Ena autora
Medeiros, Rodrigo
Mesa Jurado, María Azahara Doctora autora 12326
Moo Culebro, Lizbeth Yamily autora 20908
Moseley, Cassandra autora
Nielsen, Erik autor
Phifer, Colin C. autor
Pischke, Erin C. autor
Schelly, Chelsea autora
Selfa, Theresa autora
Silva, Chelsea A. autora
Souza, Tatiana autora
Sweitz, Samuel R. autor
Vázquez Navarrete, César J. autor
author_facet Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora
Flaspohler, David J. autor
Webster, Christopher R. autor
Abrams, Jesse autor
Almeida, Sara M. autora
Arriaga Weiss, Stefan Louis Doctor autor 15154
Barnett, Brad autor
Cardoso, Maíra R. autora
Cerqueira, Pablo V. autor
Córdoba, Diana autora
Dantas Santos, Marcos Persio autor
Dunn, Jennifer L. autora
Eastmond Spencer, Amarella Doctora autora 14150
Jarvi, Gina M. autora
Licata, Julian A. autor
Mata Zayas, Ena autora
Medeiros, Rodrigo
Mesa Jurado, María Azahara Doctora autora 12326
Moo Culebro, Lizbeth Yamily autora 20908
Moseley, Cassandra autora
Nielsen, Erik autor
Phifer, Colin C. autor
Pischke, Erin C. autor
Schelly, Chelsea autora
Selfa, Theresa autora
Silva, Chelsea A. autora
Souza, Tatiana autora
Sweitz, Samuel R. autor
Vázquez Navarrete, César J. autor
author_sort Knowlton, Jessie L. autora
title Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_short Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_full Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_fullStr Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_full_unstemmed Birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
title_sort birds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/258
work_keys_str_mv AT knowltonjessielautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT halvorsenkathleeneautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT flaspohlerdavidjautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT websterchristopherrautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT abramsjesseautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT almeidasaramautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT arriagaweissstefanlouisdoctorautor15154 birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT barnettbradautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT cardosomairarautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT cerqueirapablovautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT cordobadianaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT dantassantosmarcospersioautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT dunnjenniferlautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT eastmondspenceramarelladoctoraautora14150 birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT jarviginamautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT licatajulianaautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT matazayasenaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT medeirosrodrigo birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT mesajuradomariaazaharadoctoraautora12326 birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT mooculebrolizbethyamilyautora20908 birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT moseleycassandraautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT nielsenerikautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT phifercolincautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT pischkeerincautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT schellychelseaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT selfatheresaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT silvachelseaaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT souzatatianaautora birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT sweitzsamuelrautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
AT vazqueznavarretecesarjautor birdsandbioenergywithintheamericasacrossnationalsocialecologicalstudyofecosystemservicetradeoffs
_version_ 1806028176063725568
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:607252024-07-10T11:26:45ZBirds and bioenergy within the americas a cross‐national, social-ecological study of ecosystem service tradeoffs Knowlton, Jessie L. autora Halvorsen, Kathleen E. autora Flaspohler, David J. autor Webster, Christopher R. autor Abrams, Jesse autor Almeida, Sara M. autora Arriaga Weiss, Stefan Louis Doctor autor 15154 Barnett, Brad autor Cardoso, Maíra R. autora Cerqueira, Pablo V. autor Córdoba, Diana autora Dantas Santos, Marcos Persio autor Dunn, Jennifer L. autora Eastmond Spencer, Amarella Doctora autora 14150 Jarvi, Gina M. autora Licata, Julian A. autor Mata Zayas, Ena autora Medeiros, Rodrigo Mesa Jurado, María Azahara Doctora autora 12326 Moo Culebro, Lizbeth Yamily autora 20908 Moseley, Cassandra autora Nielsen, Erik autor Phifer, Colin C. autor Pischke, Erin C. autor Schelly, Chelsea autora Selfa, Theresa autora Silva, Chelsea A. autora Souza, Tatiana autora Sweitz, Samuel R. autor Vázquez Navarrete, César J. autor textengAlthough renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.Although renewable energy holds great promise in mitigating climate change, there are socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs related to each form of renewable energy. Forest-related bioenergy is especially controversial, because tree plantations often replace land that could be used to grow food crops and can have negative impacts on biodiversity. In this study, we examined public perceptions and ecosystem service tradeoffs between the provisioning services associated with cover types associated with bioenergy crop (feedstock) production and forest habitat-related supporting services for birds, which themselves provide cultural and regulating services. We combined a social survey-based assessment of local values and perceptions with measures of bioenergy feedstock production impacts on bird habitat in four countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Respondents in all countries rated birds as important or very important (83–99% of respondents) and showed lower enthusiasm for, but still supported, the expansion of bioenergy feedstocks (48–60% of respondents). Bioenergy feedstock cover types in Brazil and Argentina had the greatest negative impact on birds but had a positive impact on birds in the USA. In Brazil and Mexico, public perceptions aligned fairly well with the realities of the impacts of potential bioenergy feedstocks on bird communities. However, in Argentina and the USA, perceptions of bioenergy impacts on birds did not match well with the data. Understanding people’s values and perceptions can help inform better policy and management decisions regarding land use changes.AvesEnergía biomásicaServicios ecosistémicosElaeis guineensisEucalyptusPopulusHábitats forestalesCambio de uso de la tierraPercepción socialArtfrosurLandhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/258Acceso en línea sin restricciones