Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley
Background and aims: Crop tolerance to waterlogging depends on factors such as species sensitivity and the stage of development that waterlogging occurs. The aim of this study was to identify the critical period for waterlogging on grain yield and its components, when applied during different stages of crop development in wheat and barley. Methods: Two experiments were carried out [E1: early sowing date, under greenhouse; E2: late sowing date, under natural conditions]. Waterlogging was imposed during 15-20 days in 5 consecutive periods during the crop cycle [from Leaf 1 emergence to maturity]. Results: The greatest yield penalties occurred when waterlogging was applied from Leaf 7 appearance on the main stem to anthesis [from 34 to 92 percent of losses in wheat, and from 40 to 79 percent in barley for E1 and E2 respectively]. Waterlogging during grain filling reduced yield to a lesser degree. In wheat, reductions in grain number were mostly explained by reduced grain number per spike while in barley, by variations in the number of spikes per plant. Conclusions: The time around anthesis was identified as the most susceptible period to waterlogging in wheat and barley. Exposing the crop to more stressful conditions, e.g. delaying sowing date, magnified the negative responses to waterlogging, although the most sensitive stage [around anthesis] remained unchanged.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Texto biblioteca |
| Language: | spa |
| Subjects: | BARLEY, BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.], BIOMASS, CROP YIELD, GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS, GROWTH RESPONSE, HORDEUM, HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE, LEAF MORPHOLOGY, SOWING DATE, TILLER CONTRIBUTION, TOLERANCE, TRITICUM AESTIVUM, WATERLOGGING, WHEAT, WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.], , |
| Online Access: | http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47125 http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
KOHA-OAI-AGRO:47125 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| spelling |
KOHA-OAI-AGRO:471252023-09-12T10:30:51Zhttp://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47125http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=AAGIdentifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barleySan Celedonio, Romina deAbeledo, Leonor GabrielaMiralles, Daniel Juliotextspaapplication/pdfBackground and aims: Crop tolerance to waterlogging depends on factors such as species sensitivity and the stage of development that waterlogging occurs. The aim of this study was to identify the critical period for waterlogging on grain yield and its components, when applied during different stages of crop development in wheat and barley. Methods: Two experiments were carried out [E1: early sowing date, under greenhouse; E2: late sowing date, under natural conditions]. Waterlogging was imposed during 15-20 days in 5 consecutive periods during the crop cycle [from Leaf 1 emergence to maturity]. Results: The greatest yield penalties occurred when waterlogging was applied from Leaf 7 appearance on the main stem to anthesis [from 34 to 92 percent of losses in wheat, and from 40 to 79 percent in barley for E1 and E2 respectively]. Waterlogging during grain filling reduced yield to a lesser degree. In wheat, reductions in grain number were mostly explained by reduced grain number per spike while in barley, by variations in the number of spikes per plant. Conclusions: The time around anthesis was identified as the most susceptible period to waterlogging in wheat and barley. Exposing the crop to more stressful conditions, e.g. delaying sowing date, magnified the negative responses to waterlogging, although the most sensitive stage [around anthesis] remained unchanged.Background and aims: Crop tolerance to waterlogging depends on factors such as species sensitivity and the stage of development that waterlogging occurs. The aim of this study was to identify the critical period for waterlogging on grain yield and its components, when applied during different stages of crop development in wheat and barley. Methods: Two experiments were carried out [E1: early sowing date, under greenhouse; E2: late sowing date, under natural conditions]. Waterlogging was imposed during 15-20 days in 5 consecutive periods during the crop cycle [from Leaf 1 emergence to maturity]. Results: The greatest yield penalties occurred when waterlogging was applied from Leaf 7 appearance on the main stem to anthesis [from 34 to 92 percent of losses in wheat, and from 40 to 79 percent in barley for E1 and E2 respectively]. Waterlogging during grain filling reduced yield to a lesser degree. In wheat, reductions in grain number were mostly explained by reduced grain number per spike while in barley, by variations in the number of spikes per plant. Conclusions: The time around anthesis was identified as the most susceptible period to waterlogging in wheat and barley. Exposing the crop to more stressful conditions, e.g. delaying sowing date, magnified the negative responses to waterlogging, although the most sensitive stage [around anthesis] remained unchanged.BARLEYBARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.]BIOMASSCROP YIELDGRAIN YIELD COMPONENTSGROWTH RESPONSEHORDEUMHORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARELEAF MORPHOLOGYSOWING DATETILLER CONTRIBUTIONTOLERANCETRITICUM AESTIVUMWATERLOGGINGWHEATWHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.]Plant and Soil |
| institution |
UBA FA |
| collection |
Koha |
| country |
Argentina |
| countrycode |
AR |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea En linea |
| databasecode |
cat-ceiba |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
America del Sur |
| libraryname |
Biblioteca Central FAUBA |
| language |
spa |
| topic |
BARLEY BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.] BIOMASS CROP YIELD GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS GROWTH RESPONSE HORDEUM HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE LEAF MORPHOLOGY SOWING DATE TILLER CONTRIBUTION TOLERANCE TRITICUM AESTIVUM WATERLOGGING WHEAT WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] BARLEY BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.] BIOMASS CROP YIELD GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS GROWTH RESPONSE HORDEUM HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE LEAF MORPHOLOGY SOWING DATE TILLER CONTRIBUTION TOLERANCE TRITICUM AESTIVUM WATERLOGGING WHEAT WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] |
| spellingShingle |
BARLEY BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.] BIOMASS CROP YIELD GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS GROWTH RESPONSE HORDEUM HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE LEAF MORPHOLOGY SOWING DATE TILLER CONTRIBUTION TOLERANCE TRITICUM AESTIVUM WATERLOGGING WHEAT WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] BARLEY BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.] BIOMASS CROP YIELD GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS GROWTH RESPONSE HORDEUM HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE LEAF MORPHOLOGY SOWING DATE TILLER CONTRIBUTION TOLERANCE TRITICUM AESTIVUM WATERLOGGING WHEAT WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] San Celedonio, Romina de Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela Miralles, Daniel Julio Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| description |
Background and aims: Crop tolerance to waterlogging depends on factors such as species sensitivity and the stage of development that waterlogging occurs. The aim of this study was to identify the critical period for waterlogging on grain yield and its components, when applied during different stages of crop development in wheat and barley. Methods: Two experiments were carried out [E1: early sowing date, under greenhouse; E2: late sowing date, under natural conditions]. Waterlogging was imposed during 15-20 days in 5 consecutive periods during the crop cycle [from Leaf 1 emergence to maturity]. Results: The greatest yield penalties occurred when waterlogging was applied from Leaf 7 appearance on the main stem to anthesis [from 34 to 92 percent of losses in wheat, and from 40 to 79 percent in barley for E1 and E2 respectively]. Waterlogging during grain filling reduced yield to a lesser degree. In wheat, reductions in grain number were mostly explained by reduced grain number per spike while in barley, by variations in the number of spikes per plant. Conclusions: The time around anthesis was identified as the most susceptible period to waterlogging in wheat and barley. Exposing the crop to more stressful conditions, e.g. delaying sowing date, magnified the negative responses to waterlogging, although the most sensitive stage [around anthesis] remained unchanged. |
| format |
Texto |
| topic_facet |
BARLEY BARLEY [HORDEUM VULGARE L.] BIOMASS CROP YIELD GRAIN YIELD COMPONENTS GROWTH RESPONSE HORDEUM HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE LEAF MORPHOLOGY SOWING DATE TILLER CONTRIBUTION TOLERANCE TRITICUM AESTIVUM WATERLOGGING WHEAT WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.] |
| author |
San Celedonio, Romina de Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela Miralles, Daniel Julio |
| author_facet |
San Celedonio, Romina de Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela Miralles, Daniel Julio |
| author_sort |
San Celedonio, Romina de |
| title |
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| title_short |
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| title_full |
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| title_fullStr |
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| title_sort |
identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley |
| url |
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47125 http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sanceledoniorominade identifyingthecriticalperiodforwaterloggingonyieldanditscomponentsinwheatandbarley AT abeledoleonorgabriela identifyingthecriticalperiodforwaterloggingonyieldanditscomponentsinwheatandbarley AT mirallesdanieljulio identifyingthecriticalperiodforwaterloggingonyieldanditscomponentsinwheatandbarley |
| _version_ |
1777661070637268992 |